Hi *,
Forwarding compliments that people on the Dutch users list are making
for the improvements in 3.5.2 :-)
Kind regards
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
On 06/04/12 19:55, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
- Florian setup a VirtualBox image for Linux regression testing
- Ubuntu precise/12.04
- has LibreOffice 3.5.x and LibreOffice 3.4.x with Rainer parallel
installation script
AA - provide Florian with a LibreOffice 3.3 build
Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Pá 06. 04. 2012 v 19:55 +0200:
* structured manual testing
- tests are in checkbox
- Call for Testing is out:
http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2012/04/opportunity-manual-application-testing.html
AA Blog about this refering to checkbox for Ubuntu and Litmus
Hi Petr, all
I'm glad to announce that the version number in the binary files now matches
the About dialog information under Windows!!!
This has been committed both to the 3.5 and 3.6 branch so it will be
available in the next RC (and Beta).
I have confirmed this with a daily build from the 3.5
Hi Rainer, Florian, *,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (07-04-12 19:05)
very often we hear this question, and again and again we have to state
that that question only can be answered by the questioner.
[...]
So after the question from someone who uses 3.4.5 and plans to update to
3.5.2 I created a
Hi Cor,
On 10/04/2012 22:45, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (06-04-12 19:55)
- CaseConductor evaluation
[...]
- Rainer: we need better documentation on the why of Litmus/MozTrap
[...]
- Kendy: Need for regular manual testing for update scenarios
[...]
- given the limited current
Hi Sophie,
Sophie Gautier wrote (10-04-12 23:05)
If it's easy, it will attract people too. QA is frightening for a lot of
users because it looks like technical when it's not.
Ah well, of course it is technical compared to what many people are used
to, but I agree with you that easier tools