Cor Nouws schrieb:
a - hunting bugs in 3.7
Hi Cor,
intensive Bug wrangling always is good, but currently I have more
concerns how to get a working 3.6.3 (at least for me that's completely
unusable).
3 Weeks ago (or so) I was frustrated that we still had nearby 300
UNCONFIRMED 3.6.
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (02-11-12 09:18)
Cor Nouws schrieb:
a - hunting bugs in 3.7
intensive Bug wrangling always is good, but [...]
3 Weeks ago (or so) I was frustrated that we still had nearby 300
UNCONFIRMED 3.6. possible regressions, now we have more than 430 [1],
and I
Hi Marc,
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 05:25 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, all the bugs mentioned in the Most Annoying Bugs
section (bottom of page) of our 3.6 Features webpage have been resolved?
Can I go ahead and update that section with strike-throughs and mark
them as
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 03:20 -0700, Pedro wrote:
ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote
my 3.6.2.1 is up to date. Shouldn't be so.
My 3.5.7.1 install reports LibreOffice 3.5 is up to date.
Shouldn't be so.
Sorry - I've not published the ESC minutes yet; Kendy is pulling the
lever
* Present:
+ Kendy, Stephan, Eike, Markus, Michael M, Petr, Lubos,
Norbert, Thorsten, Caolan, Ahmad.
+ bad week for US overlap; regrets from Joel etc.
* Completed Action Items
+ issues to look into if we can
+ fdo#34548 - review Michael's patch
Sophie Gautier píše v St 31. 10. 2012 v 18:18 +0100:
On 31/10/2012 16:36, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-10-31 15:35:
I have seen that people put large test documents into wiki and mentioned
links in bugzilla or E-mails.
Another solution would be a
Hi,
Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-11-02 14:12:
I wonder if wiki is good for this purpose or it there is a better
solutions. I am afraid that we could not increase the limit in bugzilla
easily.
the wiki is used for that, lacking alternatives, but it is definitely
not optimal. :/
If you let me
On 02/11/2012 16:13, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-11-02 14:12:
I wonder if wiki is good for this purpose or it there is a better
solutions. I am afraid that we could not increase the limit in bugzilla
easily.
the wiki is used for that, lacking alternatives,
Florian Effenberger píše v Pá 02. 11. 2012 v 16:13 +0100:
Hi,
Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-11-02 14:12:
I wonder if wiki is good for this purpose or it there is a better
solutions. I am afraid that we could not increase the limit in bugzilla
easily.
the wiki is used for that, lacking
Hi Sophie, *,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Sophie Gautier gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What we need is a very simple way for a French user to send an
attachment. If he needs to subscribe or register elsewhere and elsewhere
again, I fear we'll just have to close the bug because he
Hi Michael, all
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
Sorry - I've not published the ESC minutes yet; Kendy is pulling the
lever to upgrade 3.5.0-3 to 3.6.3 - and we planned to wait a week to see
if there are any user-horror stories before promoting 3.6.3 to everyone
as the upgrade path.
Does
Hi,
Petr Mladek wrote on 2012-11-02 16:38:
We need a place where to share test documents that are needed for
reproducing bugs. It would be useful in different scenarios:
* discussing problems on regional or global mailing lists; such
files could get limited lifetime
* too big
12 matches
Mail list logo
