https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090
kurt.nordb...@protonmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090
Bug ID: 161090
Summary: Allow specifying how many / which values are grouped
in remainder of Pie-of-Pie or Bar-of-Pie chart
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 24.8.0.0 alpha0+
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160920
--- Comment #13 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #0)
> It's - as far as I know - mostly unclear that double clicking a page style
> in the Stylist (eh.. pane Manage Styles :D ) applies that to the active
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161075
--- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #7)
> You should have looked to what the menu entries do and noticed a difference
> in the dialogs titles...
Ah, but I shouldn't have to. It's the Format menu.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #9)
> Apart from your arguments, "making use of styles easy/promoting the use of
> styles" is a good principle in our work.
Unfortunately - it isn't; and this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7)
> While I fully agree with Mike's comments
Then please read my last comment and I'm sure you'll change your mind.
> it might be worth to think about
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #4)
> ... it is not impossible... but what would be the upside of this[?]
The opposite of the problems with which I described the current situation:
*
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #9 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6)
> I disagree that a "consistency" argument is applicable / fair in this
> context.
Apart from your arguments, "making use of styles easy/promoting the use of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161075
--- Comment #7 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> * Character...
> * Paragraph...
> * Bullets and Numbering...
> * Page Style...
>
> One of these does not fit the naming scheme of the rest. Which is it?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160650
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161037
--- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #3)
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
> > This is expected with the current +F5 toggle (.uno:Sidebar) which
> > *closes* or *opens a new
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161082
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160858
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
The Apply function would be added next to Reset on the bottom bar. Like it is
implemented for the Format > Page Style dialog.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160938
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 194124
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194124=edit
Example document
If you copy/paste a table with form controls the resulting names are amended
with a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
While I fully agree with Mike's comments it might be worth to think about from
another angle (actually as bugs should be reported). Something like: "I insert
a graphic on page 5 and want to make this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161082
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
And my reply
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #12)
> From the efficiency POV, the most relevant function should be in focus. And
> that's the number of copies: ctrl+P into the dialog, arrow up
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski ---
And let me also provide a "philosophical" view on this.
The proposal argues that since we allow DF for other entities, we should do the
same for pages. But this is like this:
1. There is a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161082
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |low
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161037
--- Comment #3 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
> This is expected with the current +F5 toggle (.uno:Sidebar) which
> *closes* or *opens a new instance* of the SB framework. Its workflow and UI
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski ---
Additionally, the page styles are *actually* not the problem that users
struggle with. The largest user problem with page management in Writer is the
concept that page sequences are *properties of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> But what is your opinion, Mike, on DF of page _sequences_?
IIUC, the suggestion is to create a way to allow a *paragraph* (the entity that
defines the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #2)
> No. It is legitimate as long as there is no "page as a primary object" in
> Writer (which is the case), unlike characters, paragraphs, and other primary
24 matches
Mail list logo
