You can simply have a distinction between endorsed or authorized
translations and other translations. It's reasonable enough to require
that the translation be indicated as not an officially accepted
translation versus requiring actual permission to publish any translation.
Obviously, it is
Dnia niedziela, 26 kwietnia 2015 09:43:06 Giuseppe Molica pisze:
I certainly did not say that -- I think someone misunderstood and
got it backwards.
The problem with translation is that if it is not done right
it has the effect of altering the point. A license that
permits anyone to
Dnia niedziela, 26 kwietnia 2015 20:49:56 Bryan Baldwin pisze:
On 04/26/15 20:24, rysiek wrote:
Problem is -- and this very discussion shows it *very* well -- that even
with such restrictive license put on works of opinion (I do not
subscribe to the view that this distinction is relevant,
Dnia niedziela, 26 kwietnia 2015 20:10:47 Bryan Baldwin pisze:
We have enough problems with people misrepresenting other people, especially
Mr. Stallman.
And licensing doesn't help with this situation in even a bit. For reasons
outlined before.
Which #%*ng essay are you gagging to translate?
On 04/26/15 20:24, rysiek wrote:
Problem is -- and this very discussion shows it *very* well -- that even with
such restrictive license put on works of opinion (I do not subscribe to the
view that this distinction is relevant, but let's work with that), views
*are*
misunderstood.
So,
On 04/26/15 02:36, Jim Garrett wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that running a server for this purpose requires a
static IP address?
No. You can enlist the aid of a dynamic dns service. I use DNSexit. The catch
of this solution is that you must run a script on your server that periodically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/26/2015 05:24 AM, rysiek wrote:
Non-free, -ND (and similar) licenses do *not* solve the problem
*** I think the opposite. ND enables the author to say: this
translation is fine and conserves the original meaning of the text.
Because we
A dishonest person will lie about endorsement, so I don't see that as adequate
protection against misrepresentation. Do you have a way to solve that
problem?
Is anyone outside of a big publisher really advocating, the bludgeon of
completely blocking anything that lacks permission.?
On
Server/Client is a false dichotomy designed to make you think of yourself as
helpless and to make people afraid of sharing. Attaching any computer to a
network opens that computer to attack but a person running a free software
social network is safer than someone simply browsing with malicious
On 04/27/15 02:51, rysiek wrote:
Maybe we could at least try to keep it civil on this list, please?
#$%^*(){ is %^$)(@^$%ing ^*()
Several years ago volunteers of an organisation I worked for translated the
following article:
http://ur1.ca/g5iwh
We reached out to FSF for permission to
10 matches
Mail list logo
