On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:46:42AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 19:20:25 +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > The -2 value is misleading because if 'qemuAgentFSFreeze' fails it
> > > doesn't necessarily mean that
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 19:20:25 +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > The -2 value is misleading because if 'qemuAgentFSFreeze' fails it
> > doesn't necessarily mean that the command was sent to the agent.
> >
> > Since callers don't care
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> The -2 value is misleading because if 'qemuAgentFSFreeze' fails it
> doesn't necessarily mean that the command was sent to the agent.
>
> Since callers don't care about the -2 value specifically, remove it.
In addition this
The -2 value is misleading because if 'qemuAgentFSFreeze' fails it
doesn't necessarily mean that the command was sent to the agent.
Since callers don't care about the -2 value specifically, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
---
src/qemu/qemu_snapshot.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1
