Not a generic one - to reproduce it you would need my custom record
implementation and access to internal work servers (neither of which I
can give out).
I have just realised however that the name field is present and
correct when the field value is set:
field.setFromString
So it appears that
Name should be set by introspect during the record initialization, so I'm not
sure why it would matter. Also, setFromString and set should both degenerate to
setBox, which should do the actual work. Can you show your setFromString
implementation? Are you overriding anything other than
The field in question is a subtype of:
sealed abstract class TextADORField[OwnerType : Record[OwnerType]]
(rec: OwnerType)
extends ADORField[OwnerType, String](rec){
def setFromString(s: String): Box[String] = {
dirty_?(true)
Full(set(s))
}
def setFromAny(in: Any): Box[String]
It is definitely the new. I thought that it was always this way because I
observed it (I thought) before I made those changes. I just reproduced your
exact case:
val rec1 = MyMetaRecord.createRecord
val res1 = rec1.foo(zippy).fields.map(_.name)
val rec2 = new MyRecord()
It was a problem with the record initialisation code and the
introspect method not being handled correctly. Fixed in:
37a59389bf65d4c558ff906427d52fb6fae5d912
Thanks to Ross for the help :-)
Cheers, Tim
On Feb 17, 6:11 pm, Ross Mellgren dri...@gmail.com wrote:
It is definitely the new. I
