To clarify, only some of the examples will become archetypes... Not all.
On 26/08/2009 10:39, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Chaps,
Any objections to me renaming sites to examples?
Moreover, I want to move some of these so called examples to be
archetypes as it
renaming sites to examples would probably be more obvious for people.
So fine by me.
About archetypes thingy that's an interesting idea. I like it.
Br's,
Marius
On Aug 26, 12:39 pm, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Chaps,
Any objections to me renaming sites to examples?
Tim,
sites to examples, certainly. For consistency lift-examples could be
better.
Some examples becoming archetype is great idea.
Cheers, Indrajit
On Aug 26, 2:59 pm, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
To clarify, only some of the examples will become archetypes... Not all.
On
So it sounds like people like this - I'll get onto it later
hopefully :-)
Cheers, Tim
On Aug 26, 12:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tim,
sites to examples, certainly. For consistency lift-examples could be
better.
Some examples becoming archetype is great idea.
+1 on re-org
No opinion on naming
+1 on archetypes
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Chaps,
Any objections to me renaming sites to examples?
Moreover, I want to move some of these so called examples to be
archetypes as it strikes me that they
If you want to compromise you can call it example-sites if it's not too
verbose...
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on re-org
No opinion on naming
+1 on archetypes
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Timothy Perrett
