Trevor Daniels wrote:
Thanks Joe. Initially these patches didn't apply either, but I
traced the reason to their having DOS (CRLF) line endings
rather than Unix (LF) line endings. When I changed that they
applied fine. (This actually might have been the original
problem too.) I don't know
Graham Percival wrote:
first patch:
- re TODO: see ancient.itely. That has accidentals inside a table.
- if you want more unnumberedsubsubsec, make the stubs now. Don't
leave
@c TODO blah
in the @menu.
- References section should have an @itemize, with an @item
pointing back at
Joe, you wrote Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:20 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Thanks Joe. Initially these patches didn't apply either, but I
traced the reason to their having DOS (CRLF) line endings
rather than Unix (LF) line endings. When I changed that they
applied fine. (This actually might
Trevor Daniels wrote:
I then looked at the actual mail message. You're using
Thunderbird with inline attachments and quoted-printable
encoding. This is the problem. I seem to remember
Jonathan Kulp discovering that Thunderbird messed up
the line endings of patches.
I'm not familiar with
Joseph Wakeling wrote:
I searched around for some info on this and think I've found the correct way
to set up Thunderbird.
... if the previous patch doesn't work, I hope the one attached to this
mail will. Let me know how it goes. :-)
Best wishes,
-- Joe
From
Hi Joe, you wroteThursday, September 03, 2009 10:35 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
I then looked at the actual mail message. You're using
Thunderbird with inline attachments and quoted-printable
encoding. This is the problem. I seem to remember
Jonathan Kulp discovering that Thunderbird messed
Joseph Wakeling wrote Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:22 PM
... if the previous patch doesn't work, I hope the one attached to
this
mail will. Let me know how it goes. :-)
Still has DOS line endings :( But it's really not a problem - I can
easily change them before applying.
I didn't
Hello everyone,
As discussed on the -user list, this is a patch to start a section in
the Specialist Notation chapter on contemporary music.
Currently it's just a menu of general sub-headings -- more will follow
in the next days. It's intended to provide both a unified collection of
references
I've added a section to basic-compile.texi with specific instructions
for OS X 10.5
The patch is attached.
Hope this is useful.
-Travis
0001-Add-Compiling-on-Mac-OS-X-section-to-basic-compile.t.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 01:42:09AM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Currently it's just a menu of general sub-headings -- more will follow
in the next days. It's intended to provide both a unified collection of
- I'm tempted to put it in front of Ancient, in an attempt to
remind everybody that
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:20:54PM -0400, Travis Briggs wrote:
I've added a section to basic-compile.texi with specific instructions
for OS X 10.5
Thanks! I moved it to Problems, and fixed a few minor points (we
officially use ma...@tie{}x for the name). But this was all
extremely easy to do,
On 2009-08-31, John Mandereau wrote:
Le lundi 31 août 2009 à 10:16 +0200, John Mandereau a écrit :
Le dimanche 30 août 2009 à 16:05 -0700, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
Attached is a patch that modifies `make distclean' so that it behaves
correctly.
Okay to apply?
BTW please no
On 2009-09-03, Travis Briggs wrote:
I've added a section to basic-compile.texi with specific instructions
for OS X 10.5
The patch is attached.
Hope this is useful.
Thanks, this definitely helps.
I'm still a bit confused about the issues with ./configure failing to
detect the Century
13 matches
Mail list logo
