Am 03.12.2021 um 19:17 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Hi all,
here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar:
https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140
(For now I've
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Oh no, please don't install this over another version of LilyPond! The
official installers are built against Guile 1.8, having both version of
this very fundamental library in the same directory will go very wrong.
I moved my current version out before I moved this one
Am 05.12.2021 um 23:09 schrieb Michael Käppler:
Under Windows 10 x64, even the simplest file
```
\version "2.23.5"
{ c4 }
```
crashes with
;;; note: source file
D:/Lilypond-generic/2.23.5-hahnjo/lilypond-2.23.5/share/guile/2.2/ice-9/eval.scm
;;; newer than compiled
Am 03.12.2021 um 19:17 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Hi all,
here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar:
https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140
(For now I've
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 22:29 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> > > Jonas wrote:
> > >
> > > "Which step does it get stuck
> > >
> > > on, parsing, output of Postscript, or conversion to PDF?"
>
> Attached is a DEBUG log of what happens here with a smallish .ly
> file.
>
> I do get a
Jonas wrote:
"Which step does it get stuck
on, parsing, output of Postscript, or conversion to PDF?"
Attached is a DEBUG log of what happens here with a smallish .ly file.
I do get a successful version log though.
And take what I provide with a pinch of salt:
- I have always used the
Jonas wrote:
"Yes, because you're passing -dgui. Either drop that, as David asked, or
look into the .log file."
If I drop that, it still doesn't say anything else.
If I keep it, it doesn't create the log file, not even an empty file.
Petr
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 19:56 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Jonas wrote:
>
> "Which step does it get stuck
>
> on, parsing, output of Postscript, or conversion to PDF?"
>
> It only says "GNU LilyPond 2.23.5 (running Guile 2.2)".
> It doesn't even start describing the individual steps.
Jonas wrote:
"Which step does it get stuck
on, parsing, output of Postscript, or conversion to PDF?"
It only says "GNU LilyPond 2.23.5 (running Guile 2.2)".
It doesn't even start describing the individual steps.
"In any case,
can you check if your antivirus program prevents or delays
Hi Jonas,
your version works on my MXLinux Laptop. Tomorrow I am going to try
Ubuntu and MacOS Monterey on Apple Silicon.
Thanks for these works to you and all others engaged in this endeavor!
Jan-Peter
Am 03.12.21 um 19:17 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond
development:
> Hi
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 13:16 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Jonas wrote:
>
>
> "Can you share a bit more details about what you're trying to do? Are
>
> you compiling a tiny example or a large score (that may just take
> long)? From Frescobaldi or from command line?"
>
> I'm running it
Petr Pařízek writes:
> Jonas wrote:
>
>
> "Can you share a bit more details about what you're trying to do? Are
>
> you compiling a tiny example or a large score (that may just take
> long)? From Frescobaldi or from command line?"
>
> I'm running it directly from the command line, with the
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 12:10 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> I'm very aware that my configuration is a highly non-standard one,
> specifically in regard to the fact that Windows 7 is no longer being
> supported or recommended. Yet I'm still running it on my laptop,
> particularly 64-bit
13 matches
Mail list logo
