Re: Fwd: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 16:44 -0800 schrieb Aaron Hill: > On 2021-12-08 12:51 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive > > a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows) > >

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.12.2021 um 06:32 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > On Wed, Dec 8 2021 at 21:25:47 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld > wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 01:43 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > > I know you want to build natively and you don't have an ARM64 > > > machine to

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2021-12-08 9:50 pm, Petr Pařízek wrote: Aaron wrote: "Verify the exception code is c005 and check whether offset is also 0036e97e.  If these match, you and I are encountering the same access violation." In my case, the exception code is indeed the same but the offset is

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Petr Pařízek
Aaron wrote: "Verify the exception code is c005 and check whether offset is also 0036e97e.  If these match, you and I are encountering the same access violation." In my case, the exception code is indeed the same but the offset is 00319e59. Petr

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Federico Bruni
On Wed, Dec 8 2021 at 21:25:47 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 01:43 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni: On Fri, Dec 3 2021 at 19:17:19 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development wrote: > here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2,

Re: Fwd: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2021-12-08 8:36 pm, Petr Pařízek wrote: Almost immediately after running lilypond.exe, I get "lilypond.exe has stopped working." Click the Start Menu and type "view reliability history" to open the Reliability Monitor. (You can also open the Control Panel and go to this path: Control Panel

Re: Fwd: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2021-12-08 12:51 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows) https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/yMx3nWMCPNLngAq It's the same binaries, but the lib/ folder with the

Re: Fwd: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Robin Bannister
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows) https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/yMx3nWMCPNLngAq No change here. DEBUG log exactly as before. Version log ok. Cheers,

Re: Fwd: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 23:10 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek: > Jonas wrote: > > > "WinRAR also works for me. I think we're missing something here..." > > It's strange indeed. The build that you made on July 3rd, under the name > "lilypond-mingw-x86_64-full", is running okay at mine,

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 15:57 +0100 schrieb Gabriel Striewe: > I would like to confirm that the binaries work fine on them. > > [...] > > My system is Big Sur 11.5.2 > > Am happy to help with further testing since I use a Mac. Thanks for testing, much appreciated! So I assume this is

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 13:16 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler: > Currently I'm trying to cross-compile with your scripts and see if the > resulting package has the same problem. > If that is the case I'll try a native build next. Unfortunately, you currently cannot compile natively on

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 01:43 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni: > On Fri, Dec 3 2021 at 19:17:19 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on > LilyPond development wrote: > > here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created > > exactly with the scripts contained in the official

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Aaron Hill
On my machine*, this build is failing due to the calls to (setlocale LC_ALL "") within declarations-init.ly and init.ly. Commenting out those calls allows the process to complete. Note the subsequent call to (setlocale LC_NUMERIC "C") in each file seems okay. (* Windows 10 Version 20H2, OS

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Gabriel Striewe
Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development writes: [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] Hi all, here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar: https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140 (For

Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Michael Käppler
Am 07.12.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: Am Montag, dem 06.12.2021 um 23:05 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler: Am 06.12.2021 um 20:47 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: How did you extract the archive? I tried both the Windows Explorer "Extract All..." and 7zip. Is there another popular program that I

Re: Fwd: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

2021-12-08 Thread Michael Käppler
Am 08.12.2021 um 07:49 schrieb Petr Pařízek via Discussions on LilyPond development: [Lots of different hashs removed] The SHA256 hash d82aaee8dc73b4ca5d9b4c6d89330cb1dc6b53d5c593e50d209a48b30604314c is the same on my machine. But I think unzipping applies some sort of checksum anyway? To be