On 2021-12-21 6:12 am, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond
development wrote:
Jonas, could you build the binaries again without stripping debugging
symbols? And maybe one edition with '--disable-optimisation' in
addition
to that?
I'm not stripping any debugging symbols from the mingw
Am Freitag, dem 17.12.2021 um 11:00 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> Am 15.12.2021 um 14:38 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> > Am 15.12.2021 um 14:25 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > > I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
> > > https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try?
Le 16/12/2021 à 13:17, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
For a data point, about 1 Windows machine in 8
is running Windows these days.
... while the remaining 7 are not running.
(Sorry, not sure if the German pun works in English.)
Whoops, I meant "Windows 7" of course. The
accidental meaning
Am 15.12.2021 um 14:38 schrieb Michael Käppler:
Am 15.12.2021 um 14:25 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Montag, dem 13.12.2021 um 22:09 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
If that still doesn't
Jonas wrote:
> I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries
> in https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1061 and works on
> my system with a more common locale configuration, including properly
For a data point, about 1 Windows machine in 8
is running Windows these days.
... while the remaining 7 are not running.
(Sorry, not sure if the German pun works in English.)
Le 16/12/2021 à 08:19, Michael Käppler a écrit :
Am 16.12.2021 um 08:00 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 00:11 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
Well, initially I ran into irrelevancies
On 2021-12-15 10:53 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.12.2021 um 13:55 -0800 schrieb Aaron Hill:
On 2021-12-15 5:25 am, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
> https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
>
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 08:19 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> Am 16.12.2021 um 08:00 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
> LilyPond development:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 00:11 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> > > A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
> > > > Well,
Am 16.12.2021 um 08:00 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 00:11 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
Well, initially I ran into irrelevancies because my .ly file (for 2.22)
has #on-the-fly, which
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 00:11 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
> >
> > Well, initially I ran into irrelevancies because my .ly file (for 2.22)
> > has #on-the-fly, which is no longer acceptable.
> >
> > I tried running convert-ly.py, but it was
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.12.2021 um 13:55 -0800 schrieb Aaron Hill:
> On 2021-12-15 5:25 am, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
> > https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
> >
A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
Well, initially I ran into irrelevancies because my .ly file (for 2.22)
has #on-the-fly, which is no longer acceptable.
I tried running convert-ly.py, but it was missing a .dll.
I will detail this later.
The attached file details this in its Case 1.
On 2021-12-15 5:25 am, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1061 and works on
my system with a more common locale configuration,
David Kastrup wrote:
Sounds like you might have mistakenly used % as a comment character in
Scheme mode (in Scheme, the comment character rather is ; ).
Yes. I found it just before taking a break.
pah = #(define-music-function (chord) (ly:music?) % cf beguine
#{ s8 \hS
Robin Bannister writes:
> Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>> I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
>> https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
>> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1061 and works on
>> my system with a more common locale
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.12.2021 um 17:12 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> So I commented out that \paper stuff, and then hit a lowlevel error.
> To be quite sure, I installed 2.23.5 (1.8) for comparison; it ran
> successfully.
>
> So this lowlevel error (Unbound variable: %) is the new nogo here.
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1061 and works on
my system with a more common locale configuration, including properly
Am 15.12.2021 um 14:25 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Montag, dem 13.12.2021 um 22:09 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
If that still doesn't work, there are two more possibilities:
1. We're
Am Montag, dem 13.12.2021 um 22:09 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
> Discussions on LilyPond development:
> > If that still doesn't work, there are two more possibilities:
> > 1. We're missing an option in building some of the
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
> If that still doesn't work, there are two more possibilities:
> 1. We're missing an option in building some of the dependencies that I
> had figured out for the proof-of-concept. I payed
On Thu, Dec 9 2021 at 18:36:47 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld
wrote:
Is it a requirement that you provide AArch64, or are there actually
users? (on which platform?)
It's not a strict requirement. I may skip this architecture and build
only x86_64, but I'd rather keep it.
I don't have any statistics
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.12.2021 um 18:14 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni:
>
> On Thu, Dec 9 2021 at 08:24:27 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld
> wrote:
> > >
> > > LilyPond is built from source on Flathub infrastructure.
> > > If you click on the green check here:
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Dec 9 2021 at 08:24:27 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld
wrote:
LilyPond is built from source on Flathub infrastructure.
If you click on the green check here:
https://github.com/flathub/org.frescobaldi.Frescobaldi/commits/master
you'll see the recent builds. This is for aarch64:
Hallo,
this is x86_64; sorry, that wasn't obvious.
% uname -a
Darwin MacAir 20.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 20.6.0: Wed Jun 23 00:26:31 PDT
2021; root:xnu-7195.141.2~5/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
Gabriel
Jonas Hahnfeld writes:
[[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 15:57
Aaron wrote:
"Would you confirm the AV you are getting is 100% reproducable? My AV
is intermittent with no obvious trigger."
I would say so. There has not been a single time this new version would
even launch.
Petr
On 2021-12-08 11:30 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
You'd be surprised what Windows does and does not do when extracting an
archive. At least when I was creating the archive with the command line
'zip' on Linux and used "Extract All..." in the Windows Explorer, it
made a difference in which order I
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 16:44 -0800 schrieb Aaron Hill:
> On 2021-12-08 12:51 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive
> > a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows)
> >
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.12.2021 um 06:32 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni:
>
> On Wed, Dec 8 2021 at 21:25:47 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld
> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 01:43 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> > > I know you want to build natively and you don't have an ARM64
> > > machine to
On 2021-12-08 9:50 pm, Petr Pařízek wrote:
Aaron wrote:
"Verify the exception code is c005 and check whether offset is
also 0036e97e. If these match, you and I are encountering the same
access violation."
In my case, the exception code is indeed the same but the offset is
Aaron wrote:
"Verify the exception code is c005 and check whether offset is also
0036e97e. If these match, you and I are encountering the same access
violation."
In my case, the exception code is indeed the same but the offset is
00319e59.
Petr
On Wed, Dec 8 2021 at 21:25:47 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld
wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 01:43 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni:
On Fri, Dec 3 2021 at 19:17:19 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on
LilyPond development wrote:
> here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile
On 2021-12-08 8:36 pm, Petr Pařízek wrote:
Almost immediately after running lilypond.exe, I get "lilypond.exe has
stopped working."
Click the Start Menu and type "view reliability history" to open the
Reliability Monitor.
(You can also open the Control Panel and go to this path: Control Panel
On 2021-12-08 12:51 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive
a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows)
https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/yMx3nWMCPNLngAq
It's the same binaries, but the lib/ folder with the
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive
a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows)
https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/yMx3nWMCPNLngAq
No change here. DEBUG log exactly as before. Version log ok.
Cheers,
Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 23:10 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Jonas wrote:
>
>
> "WinRAR also works for me. I think we're missing something here..."
>
> It's strange indeed. The build that you made on July 3rd, under the name
> "lilypond-mingw-x86_64-full", is running okay at mine,
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 15:57 +0100 schrieb Gabriel Striewe:
> I would like to confirm that the binaries work fine on them.
>
> [...]
>
> My system is Big Sur 11.5.2
>
> Am happy to help with further testing since I use a Mac.
Thanks for testing, much appreciated! So I assume this is
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 13:16 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> Currently I'm trying to cross-compile with your scripts and see if the
> resulting package has the same problem.
> If that is the case I'll try a native build next.
Unfortunately, you currently cannot compile natively on
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 01:43 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> On Fri, Dec 3 2021 at 19:17:19 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
> LilyPond development wrote:
> > here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
> > exactly with the scripts contain
On my machine*, this build is failing due to the calls to (setlocale
LC_ALL "") within declarations-init.ly and init.ly. Commenting out
those calls allows the process to complete. Note the subsequent call to
(setlocale LC_NUMERIC "C") in each file seems okay.
(* Windows 10 Version 20H2, OS
Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
writes:
[[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
Hi all,
here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar:
https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140
Am 07.12.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Montag, dem 06.12.2021 um 23:05 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
Am 06.12.2021 um 20:47 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
How did you extract the archive? I tried both the Windows Explorer
"Extract All..." and 7zip. Is there another popular program that I
Am 08.12.2021 um 07:49 schrieb Petr Pařízek via Discussions on LilyPond
development:
[Lots of different hashs removed]
The SHA256 hash
d82aaee8dc73b4ca5d9b4c6d89330cb1dc6b53d5c593e50d209a48b30604314c
is the same on my machine.
But I think unzipping applies some sort of checksum anyway?
To be
Carlin wrote:
„Can you generate and post a hash of the lilypond.exe you have on your
Win 7 64-bit machine? This would show if anything got bothered in
download or decompression.“
<<>>
**
*Filename*
*MD5*
*SHA1*
*CRC32*
*SHA-256*
On Fri, Dec 3 2021 at 19:17:19 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development wrote:
here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar:
https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140
(For now I've
On 12/7/2021 4:10 PM, Petr Pařízek wrote:
The build that you made on July 3rd, under the name
"lilypond-mingw-x86_64-full", is running okay
Can you generate and post a hash of the lilypond.exe you have on your
Win 7 64-bit machine? This would show if anything got bothered in
download or
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Can't spot anything wrong here. All variables are set as they should,
Guile should be able to find its files...
My verbose log was similar.
Here is a list of the files as unzipped on my system.
Cheers,
Robin
bin\abc2ly.py
bin\convert-ly.py
bin\etf2ly.py
Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 21:15 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Jonas wrote:
>
> "Is there another popular program that I
> don't know, after not using Windows in years?"
>
> WinRAR. Or as to my preference, the console "RAR" application.
WinRAR also works for me. I think we're missing
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 23:28 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Robin wrote:
>
>
> "Attached is a DEBUG log of what happens here with a smallish .ly file."
>
>
> Okay, I've tried to do something similar, except that I had to copy the
> contents from my screen output, which means that it
Jonas wrote:
"Is there another popular program that I
don't know, after not using Windows in years?"
WinRAR. Or as to my preference, the console "RAR" application.
Petr
Am Montag, dem 06.12.2021 um 23:05 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> Am 06.12.2021 um 20:47 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > How did you extract the archive? I tried both the Windows Explorer
> > "Extract All..." and 7zip. Is there another popular program that I
> > don't know, after not using Windows
Am 06.12.2021 um 20:47 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 23:09 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
Am 03.12.2021 um 19:17 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Under Windows 10 x64, even the simplest file
```
\version "2.23.5"
{ c4 }
```
crashes with
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 23:09 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> Am 03.12.2021 um 19:17 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
> LilyPond development:
>
> Under Windows 10 x64, even the simplest file
>
> ```
> \version "2.23.5"
>
> { c4 }
> ```
>
> crashes with
>
> ;;; note: source
Am 03.12.2021 um 19:17 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Hi all,
here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar:
https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140
(For now I've
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Oh no, please don't install this over another version of LilyPond! The
official installers are built against Guile 1.8, having both version of
this very fundamental library in the same directory will go very wrong.
I moved my current version out before I moved this one
Am 05.12.2021 um 23:09 schrieb Michael Käppler:
Under Windows 10 x64, even the simplest file
```
\version "2.23.5"
{ c4 }
```
crashes with
;;; note: source file
D:/Lilypond-generic/2.23.5-hahnjo/lilypond-2.23.5/share/guile/2.2/ice-9/eval.scm
;;; newer than compiled
Am 03.12.2021 um 19:17 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Hi all,
here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar:
https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140
(For now I've
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 22:29 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> > > Jonas wrote:
> > >
> > > "Which step does it get stuck
> > >
> > > on, parsing, output of Postscript, or conversion to PDF?"
>
> Attached is a DEBUG log of what happens here with a smallish .ly
> file.
>
> I do get a
Jonas wrote:
"Which step does it get stuck
on, parsing, output of Postscript, or conversion to PDF?"
Attached is a DEBUG log of what happens here with a smallish .ly file.
I do get a successful version log though.
And take what I provide with a pinch of salt:
- I have always used the
Jonas wrote:
"Yes, because you're passing -dgui. Either drop that, as David asked, or
look into the .log file."
If I drop that, it still doesn't say anything else.
If I keep it, it doesn't create the log file, not even an empty file.
Petr
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 19:56 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Jonas wrote:
>
> "Which step does it get stuck
>
> on, parsing, output of Postscript, or conversion to PDF?"
>
> It only says "GNU LilyPond 2.23.5 (running Guile 2.2)".
> It doesn't even start describing the individual steps.
Jonas wrote:
"Which step does it get stuck
on, parsing, output of Postscript, or conversion to PDF?"
It only says "GNU LilyPond 2.23.5 (running Guile 2.2)".
It doesn't even start describing the individual steps.
"In any case,
can you check if your antivirus program prevents or delays
Hi all,
>
> here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
> exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar:
> https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140
> (For now I've published them on my repo, but I can also add them to the
> official
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 13:16 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Jonas wrote:
>
>
> "Can you share a bit more details about what you're trying to do? Are
>
> you compiling a tiny example or a large score (that may just take
> long)? From Frescobaldi or from command line?"
>
> I'm running it
Petr Pařízek writes:
> Jonas wrote:
>
>
> "Can you share a bit more details about what you're trying to do? Are
>
> you compiling a tiny example or a large score (that may just take
> long)? From Frescobaldi or from command line?"
>
> I'm running it directly from the command line, with the
Am Sonntag, dem 05.12.2021 um 12:10 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> I'm very aware that my configuration is a highly non-standard one,
> specifically in regard to the fact that Windows 7 is no longer being
> supported or recommended. Yet I'm still running it on my laptop,
> particularly 64-bit
Hi all,
here are the binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, created
exactly with the scripts contained in the official source tar:
https://gitlab.com/hahnjo/lilypond/-/packages/4049140
(For now I've published them on my repo, but I can also add them to the
official one and link it from
67 matches
Mail list logo
