On 2021-12-21 6:12 am, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond
development wrote:
Jonas, could you build the binaries again without stripping debugging
symbols? And maybe one edition with '--disable-optimisation' in
addition
to that?
I'm not stripping any debugging symbols from the mingw
Am Freitag, dem 17.12.2021 um 11:00 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> Am 15.12.2021 um 14:38 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> > Am 15.12.2021 um 14:25 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > > I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
> > > https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try?
Le 16/12/2021 à 13:17, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
For a data point, about 1 Windows machine in 8
is running Windows these days.
... while the remaining 7 are not running.
(Sorry, not sure if the German pun works in English.)
Whoops, I meant "Windows 7" of course. The
accidental meaning
Am 15.12.2021 um 14:38 schrieb Michael Käppler:
Am 15.12.2021 um 14:25 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Montag, dem 13.12.2021 um 22:09 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
If that still doesn't
Jonas wrote:
> I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries
> in https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1061 and works on
> my system with a more common locale configuration, including properly
For a data point, about 1 Windows machine in 8
is running Windows these days.
... while the remaining 7 are not running.
(Sorry, not sure if the German pun works in English.)
Le 16/12/2021 à 08:19, Michael Käppler a écrit :
Am 16.12.2021 um 08:00 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 00:11 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
Well, initially I ran into irrelevancies
On 2021-12-15 10:53 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.12.2021 um 13:55 -0800 schrieb Aaron Hill:
On 2021-12-15 5:25 am, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
> https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
>
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 08:19 +0100 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> Am 16.12.2021 um 08:00 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
> LilyPond development:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 00:11 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> > > A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
> > > > Well,
Am 16.12.2021 um 08:00 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development:
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 00:11 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
Well, initially I ran into irrelevancies because my .ly file (for 2.22)
has #on-the-fly, which
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 00:11 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
> >
> > Well, initially I ran into irrelevancies because my .ly file (for 2.22)
> > has #on-the-fly, which is no longer acceptable.
> >
> > I tried running convert-ly.py, but it was
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.12.2021 um 13:55 -0800 schrieb Aaron Hill:
> On 2021-12-15 5:25 am, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
> > https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
> >
A few hours ago I wrote (re 2.23.5fixed)
Well, initially I ran into irrelevancies because my .ly file (for 2.22)
has #on-the-fly, which is no longer acceptable.
I tried running convert-ly.py, but it was missing a .dll.
I will detail this later.
The attached file details this in its Case 1.
On 2021-12-15 5:25 am, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1061 and works on
my system with a more common locale configuration,
David Kastrup wrote:
Sounds like you might have mistakenly used % as a comment character in
Scheme mode (in Scheme, the comment character rather is ; ).
Yes. I found it just before taking a break.
pah = #(define-music-function (chord) (ly:music?) % cf beguine
#{ s8 \hS
Robin Bannister writes:
> Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>> I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
>> https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
>> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1061 and works on
>> my system with a more common locale
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.12.2021 um 17:12 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> So I commented out that \paper stuff, and then hit a lowlevel error.
> To be quite sure, I installed 2.23.5 (1.8) for comparison; it ran
> successfully.
>
> So this lowlevel error (Unbound variable: %) is the new nogo here.
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
I think I got it, can you give the newly built binaries in
https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/3gpCEQnjZZAT8FJ a try? This uses
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1061 and works on
my system with a more common locale configuration, including properly
Am 15.12.2021 um 14:25 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Montag, dem 13.12.2021 um 22:09 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
If that still doesn't work, there are two more possibilities:
1. We're
Am Montag, dem 13.12.2021 um 22:09 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
> Discussions on LilyPond development:
> > If that still doesn't work, there are two more possibilities:
> > 1. We're missing an option in building some of the
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
> If that still doesn't work, there are two more possibilities:
> 1. We're missing an option in building some of the dependencies that I
> had figured out for the proof-of-concept. I payed
On 2021-12-08 11:30 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
You'd be surprised what Windows does and does not do when extracting an
archive. At least when I was creating the archive with the command line
'zip' on Linux and used "Extract All..." in the Windows Explorer, it
made a difference in which order I
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 16:44 -0800 schrieb Aaron Hill:
> On 2021-12-08 12:51 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive
> > a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows)
> >
On 2021-12-08 8:36 pm, Petr Pařízek wrote:
Almost immediately after running lilypond.exe, I get "lilypond.exe has
stopped working."
Click the Start Menu and type "view reliability history" to open the
Reliability Monitor.
(You can also open the Control Panel and go to this path: Control Panel
On 2021-12-08 12:51 pm, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive
a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows)
https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/yMx3nWMCPNLngAq
It's the same binaries, but the lib/ folder with the
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Okay, now it's getting interesting. Can you give the following archive
a try? (also CC'ing the other people who reported problems on Windows)
https://cloud.hahnjo.de/index.php/s/yMx3nWMCPNLngAq
No change here. DEBUG log exactly as before. Version log ok.
Cheers,
Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 23:10 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Jonas wrote:
>
>
> "WinRAR also works for me. I think we're missing something here..."
>
> It's strange indeed. The build that you made on July 3rd, under the name
> "lilypond-mingw-x86_64-full", is running okay at mine,
Am 08.12.2021 um 07:49 schrieb Petr Pařízek via Discussions on LilyPond
development:
[Lots of different hashs removed]
The SHA256 hash
d82aaee8dc73b4ca5d9b4c6d89330cb1dc6b53d5c593e50d209a48b30604314c
is the same on my machine.
But I think unzipping applies some sort of checksum anyway?
To be
Carlin wrote:
„Can you generate and post a hash of the lilypond.exe you have on your
Win 7 64-bit machine? This would show if anything got bothered in
download or decompression.“
<<>>
**
*Filename*
*MD5*
*SHA1*
*CRC32*
*SHA-256*
On 12/7/2021 4:10 PM, Petr Pařízek wrote:
The build that you made on July 3rd, under the name
"lilypond-mingw-x86_64-full", is running okay
Can you generate and post a hash of the lilypond.exe you have on your
Win 7 64-bit machine? This would show if anything got bothered in
download or
Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 21:15 +0100 schrieb Petr Pařízek:
> Jonas wrote:
>
> "Is there another popular program that I
> don't know, after not using Windows in years?"
>
> WinRAR. Or as to my preference, the console "RAR" application.
WinRAR also works for me. I think we're missing
Jonas wrote:
"Is there another popular program that I
don't know, after not using Windows in years?"
WinRAR. Or as to my preference, the console "RAR" application.
Petr
32 matches
Mail list logo
