On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:05:35AM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Docs have always been FDLv1.1 or later. I was thinking about
unilaterially changing them to FDLv1.3 or later, as soon as I've
got GUB working.
Great, that should simplify matters A LOT. Where in the
Graham Percival wrote:
The beginnings of the manuals. In my restructuring, that's now in
macros.itexi, although this may well move to a third macro file.
Hmm, I just noticed that the copyright years are messed up... I'll
fix that fairly soon.
Brilliant. So as far as the docs are concerned
Joseph Wakeling wrote Thursday, September 10, 2009 2:10 PM
What would be good is if as many contributors as possible can
reply to
this email just to OK (i) my putting copyright/licensing notices
in the
files they have contributed to and (ii) their licensing
preferences for
their
Don Armstrong wrote:
This is now my problem,[1] so I'll attempt to get it addressed at some
point in the future. [I'd certainly like to see Lilypond at least
clear up some of the issues so that the above can become correct.]
Hmm, I noted you were listed as the Debian maintainer on Launchpad's
The source material could be public domain, but the snippet itself is
a 'derivative work' and is thus under the copyright of whoever made
it.
-Travis
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Valentin Villenave
v.villen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Joseph Wakeling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2009 16:21:34 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Op donderdag 10-09-2009 om 15:28 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Valentin
Villenave:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Joseph Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
In message 4aa8fadd.5050...@webdrake.net, Joseph Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes
Now, future policies -- I would suggest new contributions be requested
to follow these rules:
-- for code, GPLv2 or later or a more liberal compatible license;
NO NO NO.
Some people are likely to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2009 17:12:42 schrieb Anthony W. Youngman:
In message 4aa8fadd.5050...@webdrake.net, Joseph Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes
Now, future policies -- I would suggest new contributions be requested
to follow
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Because they are not allowed by copyright law. They cannot change the license
if the file is only mostly their work. They can only change the license if
the file is SOLELY their work.
Well, technically they can release their bit of the file under their own
license,
Travis Briggs wrote:
The source material could be public domain, but the snippet itself is
a 'derivative work' and is thus under the copyright of whoever made
it.
What I recall from submitting to LSR was that I was asked to agree that
by submitting this snippet, I was (a) consigning it to the
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Don Armstrong wrote:
(There are a significant number of files distributed in lilypond
which are under v2 or later, or v3 or later, as well as things
like input/mutopia/claop.py, which isn't even Free Software, as it
cannot be modified.[2])
If
In message 200909101742.10364.reinh...@kainhofer.com, Reinhold
Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes
Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2009 17:12:42 schrieb Anthony W. Youngman:
In message 4aa8fadd.5050...@webdrake.net, Joseph Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes
Now, future policies -- I
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:10:53PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
(There are a significant number of files distributed in lilypond which
are under v2 or later, or v3 or later, as well as things like
input/mutopia/claop.py, which isn't even Free Software, as it cannot
be modified.[2])
If
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:07:06PM +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message 200909101742.10364.reinh...@kainhofer.com, Reinhold
Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes
... So we'll have the same problem again in some years... By then it will be
even harder tracking down all contributors,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:07:06PM +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message 200909101742.10364.reinh...@kainhofer.com, Reinhold
Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes
... So we'll have the same problem again in some years... By then it will be
even harder tracking down all contributors,
Graham Percival wrote:
Docs have always been FDLv1.1 or later. I was thinking about
unilaterially changing them to FDLv1.3 or later, as soon as I've
got GUB working.
Great, that should simplify matters A LOT. Where in the source tree is
the explicit statement of the 'or later' ... ?
16 matches
Mail list logo
