Hello Paul & al.
Here is the link that Vincent sent to me (didn’t notice is was privately), with
the solution I mentioned in my answer to the list:
\version "2.22.1"
% scoops, thanks to v...@vintherine.org
#(define (scoop-stencil grob)
(ly:stencil-add
(ly:note-head::print grob)
> On Jan 14, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Valentin Petzel wrote:
>
> ...
> Lilypond uses these GM names, which makes Lilypond a somewhat GM compatible
> source. This means that as long as we use a GM compatible synth everything
> should have the right sound.
I was using VLC to play it. Does this mean
Also, be sure you are using the font name exactly as the system knows
it. To find out, click on the font in the Font Settings window.
Properly installed fonts will show you the metadata. In your Lilypond
code, specify the font name exactly as it is in the "Full Name" field
of the metadata. That
Hello Elaine,
While I cannot say anything for sure (lacking a Windows system) I guess the
fonts are installed in some folder in your user directory that is not part of
the fontconfig font path. The system location for fonts on windows is C:
\Windows\Fonts. Try to copy your font files directly
Hi,
I'm setting up an new lilypond environment
on a surface pro running windows 10
using VSCode as an editor,
and cygwin as a terminal.
I am not able to get lilypond to use my fonts yet.
I was able to install them in windows itself,
since I can see them in the windows Fonts Settings.
To do
That is not in fact worded correctly. The midi standard allows a midi
controller to specify a program to the midi synthesizer, which is a number in
0-127 and is intended to allow for switching between different sounds (although
it is in fact the decision of the synthesizer what to do with
Hello Jean,
That makes sense, thank you (I supposed it was something legacy, else why
would it be there?).
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Freitag, 14. Jänner 2022, 21:59:31 CET schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
> Le 14/01/2022 à 20:41, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
> > Hello Richard,
> >
> > The file you’ve given us
On 12/01/2022 04:26, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
I'm not quite sure how to search online for this, hence my asking here.
I'm doing a little bit of arranging of some baroque pieces for specific
instruments, which usually requires some transposition. I can transpose
within the lilypond file so
On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 20:41 +0100, Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> The file you’ve given us has a lot of nonsensical quoting in lines
> 149-153.
>
> Basically `(path ...) is already quasi-quoted, so there is no reason
> to quote
> the symbol round (as it is already quoted). Also you
Hi Valentin,
Nashville Numbers came up repeatedly on this list in the last years. I'm
also a huge fan and would like to see them implemented.
Altered degrees are written b3 or #4 in the Nashville system. Chord
modifiers are as per normal. But there are also rhythmic markers that
should be
Le 14/01/2022 à 20:41, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
Hello Richard,
The file you’ve given us has a lot of nonsensical quoting in lines 149-153.
Actually, not completely nonsensical, but legacy. There used to
be one more level of quoting inside stencil expressions until
commit
Hello Sam,
(please keep lilypond-user in the address list)
The big problem here is the the chord naming function (which is responsible
for creating that chordname) does not expect the root name to depend on
context properties, so it does not pass the context as argument. This means we
cannot
Hello Sam,
Sure, just use (number->string (1+ step)) to increment the number by 1.
Generally it is possible to do more, but you’d need to specify what is needed.
After all most of us probably have no real knowledge about the Nashville
System. For example this does not yet incorporate
Hello Richard,
The file you’ve given us has a lot of nonsensical quoting in lines 149-153.
Basically `(path ...) is already quasi-quoted, so there is no reason to quote
the symbol round (as it is already quoted). Also you will get an error for
line 150 where we have
`(,@',(concatenate
Dear Devin,
did You succeed with your research? I would be interested in a file with
definitions for notenames and accidental glyphs.
Thanks,
Stefan
Am Do., 29. Juli 2021 um 13:24 Uhr schrieb :
> Thank you; I will do some research.
>
> On 2021-07-28 13:49, Stefan Thomas wrote:
> > Dear Devin,
>
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 21:06 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 11:53 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > 2018-03-25 21:13 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann :
> > > I have been using a bit of code written by Mark Witmer to achieve
> > > wavy
> > >
> [...] someone can suggest a
> > > correct way
Hello Sam,
What do want? ENTER chords in this system, or DISPLAY them in this system, or
both? I know nothing about this system, but you can specify what symbol gets
printed for chord roots like this
\version "2.22.1"
\chords {
\set chordRootNamer =
#(lambda (pitch lowercase?)
(let*
Le 14/01/2022 à 10:39, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
Hi Rajesh,
Am 14.01.22 um 01:44 schrieb Rajesh Baskar:
I'm tying to display a question mark at the center of the 1st measure
in a 2 measure score.
I have got this working with hard-coding the offset (3 . 4.5) but
this will not work when
What is the name of the ‘up arc’ ornament on the first note in this score? Then
I’ll look it up in the LPNR.
That's a Scoop. I don't think LilyPond supports it directly, but several ways
of faking it are shown in this thread (two links to different ways of viewing
it):
Hi Rajesh,
Am 14.01.22 um 01:44 schrieb Rajesh Baskar:
I'm tying to display a question mark at the center of the 1st measure
in a 2 measure score.
I have got this working with hard-coding the offset (3 . 4.5) but this
will not work when the number of notes in a measure is larger than 3.
Is
Am Fr., 14. Jan. 2022 um 05:38 Uhr schrieb Tim's Bitstream
:
>
> There was a thread earlier this year on that very topic:
>
> https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2021-06/msg00023.html
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2022, at 8:48 PM, Sam Gibson wrote:
>
>
> Good day.
>
> I wish to use the
Hello Aaron,
Vincent’s solution might be taken over by Lily itself, IMHO.
JM
> Le 14 janv. 2022 à 09:58, Aaron Hill a écrit :
>
> On 2022-01-14 12:13 am, Jacques Menu wrote:
>> What is the name of the ‘up arc’ ornament on the first note in this
>> score? Then I’ll look it up in the LPNR.
>
>
On 2022-01-14 12:13 am, Jacques Menu wrote:
What is the name of the ‘up arc’ ornament on the first note in this
score? Then I’ll look it up in the LPNR.
I think "scoop" might be the term. Did we ever get a \bendBefore as the
logical companion to \bendAfter?
-- Aaron Hill
Jacques Menu wrote:
What is the name of the ‘up arc’ ornament on the first note in this
score? Then I’ll look it up in the LPNR.
Some say scoop:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2019-10/msg00274.html
Cheers,
Robin
24 matches
Mail list logo
