Re: Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives?

Cool! TBH I've not used point-and-click much, but according to the documentation it should work both ways: https://github.com/martineausimon/nvim-lilypond-suite/wiki/2.-Configuration#point-and-click Roosna & Flak Contemporary Dance & Music https://roosnaflak.com Original Message

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:10 PM Pierre-Luc Gauthier wrote: > > { > > s2...\< s16\! | > > } > > ...that I do it almost automatically. > > Try that in 12/8 :-) > { \time 12/8 s1*23/16\< s16\! | % ?? } Yeah, I see your point. ;) -- Knute Snortum

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Kenneth Flak)

Sounds like just the VSLilyPond-PDF-Preview extension is not being maintained. I'll take a look at that tonight...thanks, Federico! On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 4:41 PM Federico Sarudiansky wrote: > Hi Jeff. > > I've been using VSLilypond for VSCode for a while now and I found a > solution for the

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Colin Campbell)

No it's only a one way point-and-click from the pdf and not as smooth and fast as Fresco. It's not as complete as Fresco but when you're a vim-centric guy on different project your're looking for interaction with your linux system and this plugin becomes really helpful for that. And his

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Kenneth Flak)

Hi Jeff. I've been using VSLilypond for VSCode for a while now and I found a solution for the annoying lack of refresh of the PDF output. It is here: https://github.com/lhl2617/VSLilyPond-PDF-preview/pull/118 Basically you have to edit a file of the Lilypond PDF preview extension

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives?

And while you are about to extend the 'Easier Editing' section: maybe for the Mac users in particular one might want to add the combination of TeXShop/LaTeX and Skim/Preview. I had a Mac until about 12 years ago when I started to use LilyPond. That was on Mac OS 10.4, before I left the Apple

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

Le jeu. 2 mai 2024, à 15 h 20, Knute Snortum a écrit : > I use a different context for all my dynamics and I've gotten so used to > typing... I do too. For bowing, nuances, articulations, etc. Btw I use quite a lot of \quoting and \tagging for that. > { > s2...\< s16\! | > } > ...that I do

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Kenneth Flak)

I kicked the tires with VScode and the VSLilypond extension set, and it worked pretty well. I'm not sure I figured out how to *automagically* update the PDF display, all I had to do was to close and reopen the file and it was there. Clicking on a note in the PDF viewer took me right to the text

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives?

This looks really good, Ken. I'm going to do a general tidy up on the Easier Editing page, but I hope to have something up for review in a day or two. I've installed neovim, but to save a bit of time: is the point-and-click two-way, like Frescobaldi, or from PDF to code only? Cheers, Colin

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Kenneth Flak)

Well done Kenneth! I don't have anything better to say.Maybe asking Simon Martineau is thoughts about that.And thanks to Werner for the proposal.It feels a little bit like I'm a part of the game, haha. I have more than 20 scores to transpose on lilypond so I'm here to stay a little longer and

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:31 AM Pierre-Luc Gauthier < p.luc.gauth...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le jeu. 2 mai 2024, à 13 h 08, Knute Snortum a écrit > : > > Perhaps I'm not getting the need for this command as you could using an > empty chord at the end of the repeat to do the same thing: > > > > { > >

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

Maybe one addition: fromEnd = #(define-music-function (delta ev mus) (ly:duration? ly:music? ly:music?) (_i "Add music @var{ev} with a distance of @var{delta} before the end of @var{ev} is usually a post-event.") #{ \context Bottom << { \skip

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

Thanks Lukas, Le jeu. 2 mai 2024, à 13 h 29, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit : > fromEnd = > #(define-music-function (delta ev mus) (ly:duration? ly:music? ly:music?) >(_i "Add music @var{ev} with a distance of @var{delta} before the end of > > @var{ev} is usually a post-event.") >#{ >

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

Le jeu. 2 mai 2024, à 13 h 08, Knute Snortum a écrit : > Perhaps I'm not getting the need for this command as you could using an empty > chord at the end of the repeat to do the same thing: > > { > <>(\< > \after 2 \> > \repeat unfold 8 {e''16 d''} <>)\!| > } The above example would not

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

Hi Pierre-Luc, Am 02.05.24 um 17:02 schrieb Pierre-Luc Gauthier: Rambling here : So, I *love* the simplicity and elegance of the \after command and I am using it pretty much everywhere. { <>( <>\< \after 2 \> \after 16*15 ) \after 16*15 \! \repeat unfold 8 {e''16 d''} | }

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

On 2 May 2024, at 19:08, Knute Snortum wrote:On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 8:04 AM Pierre-Luc Gauthier wrote:Rambling here : So, I *love* the simplicity and elegance of the \after command and I am using it pretty much everywhere. {   <>(   <>\<   \after 2 \>   \after 16*15

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives?

Glad to hear that the description is useful for you! I agree, the website is not great at onboarding new users... Best, Kenneth Raphael Mankin, May 02, 2024 at 20:07: > This is a much better description of Neovim than exists on any of the > Neovim web-sites. They all jump straight into detail

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 8:04 AM Pierre-Luc Gauthier wrote: > Rambling here : > > So, I *love* the simplicity and elegance of the \after command and I > am using it pretty much everywhere. > > { > <>( > <>\< > \after 2 \> > \after 16*15 ) > \after 16*15 \! > \repeat unfold 8 {e''16

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives?

This is a much better description of Neovim than exists on any of the Neovim web-sites. They all jump straight into detail without telling one what the whole thing is about. I struggled to work out what Neovim is, or why I should want to use it. On 02/05/2024 05:33, Kenneth Flak wrote: OK,

\after … \beforeLast?

Rambling here : So, I *love* the simplicity and elegance of the \after command and I am using it pretty much everywhere. { <>( <>\< \after 2 \> \after 16*15 ) \after 16*15 \! \repeat unfold 8 {e''16 d''} | } and since then I often end up doing head math to figure out what I must add

Re: slurs problem with voices

On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 10:55 PM Robert Garrigos wrote: > Oh this is a bit embarrassing, such a basic error….. sorry, I never > realized that the parenthesis needs to be right after the first note. > Nothing to be embarrassed about. It takes some getting used to. -- Knute Snortum