P Spalding wrote:
That would be excellent, Arnold. I've been inking in the accidental in
past.
Here you are!
http://old.nabble.com/file/p33991423/pitchedArticulations.ly
pitchedArticulations.ly is my include file. Created on Win7 - I hope the
CR/NL will not harm on UNIX.
A 'short'
Dear fellow-users,
I'm working on a vocal piece in which some lyrics are in parentheses, but
the opening parentheses don't appear in the output PDF file. The closing
parentheses are fine. By way of example, here's a couple of bars from the
piece:
\version 2.14.2
\relative c'
- Original Message -
From: Philip Thomas philip.tho...@bluewin.ch
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:04 PM
Subject: Opening parentheses in lyrics don't appear
Dear fellow-users,
I'm working on a vocal piece in which some lyrics are in parentheses, but
the opening
-Original Message-
From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
Sent: Monday 11 June 2012 15:13
To: Philip Thomas; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Opening parentheses in lyrics don't appear
- Original Message -
From: Philip Thomas philip.tho...@bluewin.ch
To:
- Original Message -
From: Philip Thomas philip.tho...@bluewin.ch
To: 'Phil Holmes' m...@philholmes.net; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: RE: Opening parentheses in lyrics don't appear
-Original Message-
From: Phil Holmes
Hello Philip,
you might use markup-lists. In markups, the parens are typeset:
--snip--
\version 2.15.40
% should run in 2.14
% define a music-function, to convert a markup-list to a list of LyricEvents
lyricmarkup = #(define-music-function (parser location mup)(markup-list?)
(make-music
Philip Thomas-2 wrote:
Dear fellow-users,
I'm working on a vocal piece in which some lyrics are in parentheses, but
the opening parentheses don't appear in the output PDF file. The closing
parentheses are fine. By way of example, here's a couple of bars from the
piece:
you can use
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sami sami.ami...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?
Message-ID: 33983806.p...@talk.nabble.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Only if there is unrepeated music played before the
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
As great as Lilypond's output is, there is a long way to go in terms
of simplification and usability (the syntax needs to be simplified
dramatically; a lot of the code users have to write is pretty ugly
and is going to
Ivan Kuznetsov ivan.k.kuznet...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
As great as Lilypond's output is, there is a long way to go in terms
of simplification and usability (the syntax needs to be simplified
dramatically; a lot of the code
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote (11 Jun 2012 14:46:31):
It was mentioned in earlier emails (as in lots of years ago) as a possible
bug, since you can't have slurs in lyrics.
--
Aha. Not a solution, but I now have a better feel for the problem.
--
I think I'll send a
eluze elu...@gmail.com writes:
I was quite amazed seeing the result of coloring a few parts of code.
in the first 2 files I just changed the location of the \colorContext
command. the 1st gives the expected result,
colorContext = #(define-music-function (parser location color) (string?)
#{
I'm in the camp, with you, that prefers this particular bit of clutter. An
end repeat barline makes my poor underworked neurons look feverishly for
the
begin repeat barline, and if it doesn't leap out at me, I'm in trouble. But
I mostly sing more classical stuff. Jazz players live lives replete
Can anyone recommend a book or website for learning Scheme as it
currently exists in Lilypond? So that I won’t start using deprecated
features or whatever. I’m fluent in Lua (which I like a lot).
I found Kent Dybvig's book to be useful and readable: http://scheme.com/tspl4/.
Scheme as it
Am 11.06.2012 18:32, schrieb David Kastrup:
It would be good if you mentioned what override-color-for-all-grobs
actually is.
I found it here:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=443
#(define (override-color-for-all-grobs color)
(lambda (context)
(let loop ((x
Am 11.06.2012 18:32, schrieb David Kastrup:
\relative does not get the opportunity to start an implied context
before \colorContext runs. As a result, \colorContext modifies the
Global context, and all grobs of the compilation are interpreted in
the same Global context sequentially.
I
On Jun 10, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
As great as Lilypond's output is, there is a long way to go in terms
of simplification and usability (the syntax needs to be simplified
dramatically; a lot of the
Music notation is complex. Any ASCII representation of
music notation likewise has to be complex.
Any simplification of lilypond syntax must mean a removal
of features.
The only other alternative is to use a WYSIWYG
editor where you draw the musical notation you
want, and good luck waiting for
Hi TIm,
I agree with much of what you said. However
It is not all that easy to make Lilypond to do things like setting four bars
to the line (something jazz musicians tend to like).
That's pretty darned simple now — check the archives for more details.
=)
Cheers,
Kieren.
Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes:
Why is it like this? Because the focus of Lilypond has been, to
a great degree, to create something that enables users to
produce beautiful sheet music. That is the raison d'être of
Lilypond. The main focus has not been on user friendliness and
On Jun 11, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
Music notation is complex. Any ASCII representation of
music notation likewise has to be complex.
Hmm, it would be more accurate to say music notation *can* be complex. It
can also be very simple. I use Lilypond for creating jazz lead
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:21:08 -0500
From: Ivan Kuznetsov ivan.k.kuznet...@gmail.com
To: Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net
Cc: lilypond-user Users lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Appreciation / Financial support
Message-ID:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:22:55AM -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Jun 11, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
Any simplification of lilypond syntax must mean a removal
of features.
With all due respect, that is IMHO incorrect. Lilypond's syntax
could be simplified through pursuing
23 matches
Mail list logo
