Re: MIDI tick resolution

On Mon 19 Mar 2018 at 21:04:47 (-0500), Karlin High wrote: > On 3/19/2018 8:49 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: > >So what if four notes are of length 77 and one note is length 76? > >No one can hear the difference. > > I'd say so, too. But human-listening is only one use case for a MIDI > file, and in

Re: MIDI tick resolution

On 3/19/2018 8:49 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: So what if four notes are of length 77 and one note is length 76? No one can hear the difference. I'd say so, too. But human-listening is only one use case for a MIDI file, and in this area I don't know what others would surprise me. Example:

Re: MIDI tick resolution

Gilberto Agostinho wrote: > > Does anyone know if it possible to change the tick resolution of LilyPond's > MIDI output to a value other than the default 384? One reason for wanting > this change is due to the fact that 384 cannot be divided by 5 and so > quintuplets on

Re: trillspann without trill

If you set the TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text = ##f this gets rid of the "tr" On Mar 19, 2018 2:06 PM, "Malte Meyn" wrote: > > > Am 19.03.2018 um 18:11 schrieb Ali Cuota: > >> Hi again, >> >> for Bach BWV 528, 2nd mvt, meas. 38-39, I need a trillspann without >>

Re: score beginning at end of first page of a bookpart

On 3/19/2018 12:03 PM, Ali Cuota wrote: I need to start a score at the end of page (in one case one system, other case 3 systems), but I don't know how to fix it. To get good help, provide a tiny example. This notation manual page might have the

Re: trillspann without trill

Am 19.03.2018 um 18:11 schrieb Ali Cuota: Hi again, for Bach BWV 528, 2nd mvt, meas. 38-39, I need a trillspann without trill (see not-so-tiny pic). How can I achieve this? Try one of the following: \version "2.19.81" { \override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text = #'()

score beginning at end of first page of a bookpart

Hello Lilyponders, I have a (I suppose simple) question about layout/paper. I need ta start a score at the end of page (in one case one system, other cas 3 systems), but I dont know how to fix it. Actually, the page with one system is vertically overstrectched (but how to fix systemspace only

Re: MIDI tick resolution

k...@aspodata.se writes: > David: >> k...@aspodata.se writes: > ... >> > You could try the attached rudimentary patch and recompile your > ... >> The patch is pretty awful. > > Please, don't be rude, I did write it was rudimentary, you don't need > to restate that. Hm, though my proposals seem

Re: MIDI tick resolution

David: > k...@aspodata.se writes: ... > > You could try the attached rudimentary patch and recompile your ... > The patch is pretty awful. Please, don't be rude, I did write it was rudimentary, you don't need to restate that. Regards, /Karl Hammar

Re: MIDI tick resolution

Am 19.03.2018 um 14:59 schrieb David Kastrup: I think we'd rather want this value to be read from some \midi layout block variable when Midi is getting initialized. That would be better than reading from a context property of course. ___

Re: MIDI tick resolution

Malte Meyn writes: > Am 19.03.2018 um 14:47 schrieb k...@aspodata.se: >> You could try the attached rudimentary patch and recompile your >> lilypond source, see if that solves your problem, and report back. > > Would it be possible to make a patch that reads this from a

Re: MIDI tick resolution

k...@aspodata.se writes: > Giberto: >> Does anyone know if it possible to change the tick resolution of LilyPond's >> MIDI output to a value other than the default 384? One reason for wanting >> this change is due to the fact that 384 cannot be divided by 5 and so >> quintuplets on a crotchet are

Re: MIDI tick resolution

Am 19.03.2018 um 14:47 schrieb k...@aspodata.se: You could try the attached rudimentary patch and recompile your lilypond source, see if that solves your problem, and report back. Would it be possible to make a patch that reads this from a context property so that the user could input

Re: MIDI tick resolution

Giberto: > Does anyone know if it possible to change the tick resolution of LilyPond's > MIDI output to a value other than the default 384? One reason for wanting > this change is due to the fact that 384 cannot be divided by 5 and so > quintuplets on a crotchet are not precise. For instance, the

Re: Nesting parallelMusic voices

Thank you for your answer! I just tested version 2.19.80. It works without warnings. I place more code below. Idea is to write a long complex part once and use it several times (and all in \parallelMusic). \version "2.18.2"\parallelMusic #'(upperLongComplexPart lowerLongComplexPart) {d''1 |

MIDI tick resolution

Hi all, Does anyone know if it possible to change the tick resolution of LilyPond's MIDI output to a value other than the default 384? One reason for wanting this change is due to the fact that 384 cannot be divided by 5 and so quintuplets on a crotchet are not precise. For instance, the default

Re: frescobaldi png output

Am 19.03.2018 um 10:55 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: Hello, Using lilypond-book-preamble.ly like in the following example \include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly " \version "2.19.81" {   c' d' a2 } I have

frescobaldi png output

Hello, Using lilypond-book-preamble.ly like in the following example \include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly" \version "2.19.81" { c' d' a2 } I have been to make Frescobaldi output a score that just fit the size of what is written (and not an entire a4 paper). I know Frescobaldi has a nice