Re: [LincolnTalk] District contiguity question

2023-11-30 Thread Bijoy Misra
In some sense people may have a tendency to think that Option E is a challenge to the town management. Personally my reaction was that the new proposal C was similar to one proposed in 2019 that was seriously objected by all present in that public meeting. That proposal was a precursor to a vote

Re: [LincolnTalk] District contiguity question

2023-11-30 Thread John Mendelson
Would you support the Village Center rezoning in March if it came to town meeting separately? Margaret Olson made clear in her post yesterday the by-laws you cite in your final paragraph are in the earliest stages of discussion so to insinuate that such a building on the Doherty's property "could

Re: [LincolnTalk] District contiguity question

2023-11-30 Thread David Cuetos
I am going to attach the email I sent to the Director of Planning, Jennifer Glass and Utile a few days ago at the bottom. I don't think there is any ambiguity in the wording of the guidelines and believe option E as sent would be compliant. However, we do not want to get bogged down on this issue.

Re: [LincolnTalk] District contiguity question

2023-11-30 Thread Carl Angiolillo
I appreciate Karla's clarifications, and her interpretation of the act seems reasonable, however the wording is indeed ambiguous so I think there is a possibility that the EOHLC could choose to interpret it differently. (As evidenced by the recent email from Jennifer Glass) However, this part of