Not long ago, we thought that interlocking finances between countries would
bring less chance of war. Europe thought it was safe to get gas from Russia
because they thought Russia would be too dependent on the revenue to go rogue.
Why would Russia, who relies on the revenue from gas, risk
Shouldn’t there be a cost benefit analysis for both these actions?
I believe that analysis said that the environmental cost of the pipeline was
too great.
The short term cost of the release was reasonable.
You have given one action in the totality of many that are not in the control
of the
The assertion has been made here on LT that:
“The reality is that US Presidents have very little influence over energy
prices, . . .”
I refer readers to this CNBC (not a right-wing news outlet) report:
“Joe Biden this year revoked a key permit needed for a U.S. stretch of the
1,200-mile
It is one world.
We are all in this together.
--
Sara Mattes
> On Aug 14, 2022, at 2:10 PM, Stephanie Smoot
> wrote:
>
> Let the politicians in Europe sweat. Europe (Germany in particular) has
> chosen to support, promote and strengthen Russian natural gas production thru
> the
Let the politicians in Europe sweat. Europe (Germany in particular) has
chosen to support, promote and strengthen Russian natural gas
production thru the glossy new Nordstrom II, instead of other energy
choices and resources available, and instead of considering issues of
energy security. Just
Thank you, ed.
That is very instructive and shines a light on the international forces beyond
our control.
Sara
--
Sara Mattes
> On Aug 13, 2022, at 4:52 PM, Edward Kern wrote:
> E international forces
> The EIA also forecasts a drop in Henry hub natural gas prices. But who
> knows. I
This isn't [only] about bashing the president. Stephanie used a thinly
coded obscenity. Are we going to argue for the right to swear on LT in
the name of free speech?
The reality is that US Presidents have very little influence over energy
prices, just as they have little influence over
The EIA also forecasts a drop in Henry hub natural gas prices. But who
knows. I expect we're going to be exporting lots of LNG to Europe to make
up for their refusal to support the Russian invasion of the Ukraine.
Note also since our electric system is about 50% based on natural gas
generators,
Disappointing that this becomes a forum for bashing the president. I thought LT
is meant for sharing neighborhood information.
Fran
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 13, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Carol Ryan wrote:
The very reason why this does not belong on a community forum .
Carol Ryan
Sent from my
The very reason why this does not belong on a community forum .
Carol Ryan
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 13, 2022, at 9:36 AM, Paul Shorb wrote:
>
>
> I can't speak to Stephanie's state of mind (so this is not a direct personal
> attack), but to explain Staci's concern, "Let's go
I can't speak to Stephanie's state of mind (so this is not a direct
personal attack), but to explain Staci's concern, "Let's go Brandon"
typically is used as a euphemism for "F*** Joe Biden".
- Paul Shorb
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 6:54 PM V Saleme wrote:
> I’m not taking a stance here but
I agree with Stephanie Smoot.Lynne L
Sent from the all new AOL app for Android
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 6:14 PM, Stephanie Smoot
wrote: --
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the
If you have concerns with a post please reach out directly to the
moderators. Please avoid using a public forum for direct personal attacks.
Thank you,
The moderators
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 6:51 PM paula louise light via Lincoln <
lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:
> I agree with Staci. I hope
I’m not taking a stance here but specifically what aspect warrants
censorship?
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 6:51 PM paula louise light via Lincoln <
lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:
> I agree with Staci. I hope the moderators review this post and take
> appropriate action. it has no place on Lincoln
I agree with Staci. I hope the moderators review this post and take
appropriate action. it has no place on Lincoln Talk.
On Friday, August 12, 2022, 06:35:52 PM EDT, Staci Montori
wrote:
Umm…how are you not on LT moderation?
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 6:14 PM Stephanie Smoot
Umm…how are you not on LT moderation?
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 6:14 PM Stephanie Smoot
wrote:
> its completely manufactured and its an outrage. lets go Brandon!
> Regards,
> *Stephanie Smoot*
>
> 857 368-9175 work
> 781 941-6842 personal cell
> *617 595-5217 *work cell
> 126 Chestnut Circle
>
its completely manufactured and its an outrage. lets go Brandon!
Regards,
*Stephanie Smoot*
857 368-9175 work
781 941-6842 personal cell
*617 595-5217 *work cell
126 Chestnut Circle
Lincoln, MA 01773
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 4:41 PM Christina Thompson <
christinathompso...@gmail.com> wrote:
I suspect the price increase has less to do with National Grid's profit
margins than with the price of natural gas supplies in the US.
[image: image.png]
from https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=52698
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 4:41 PM Christina Thompson <
I just had a conversation with someone at National Grid about my gas bill
and was told that, yes, there had been a price increase. Apparently the
price of gas in March 2021 was $.58/therm. In March 2022 it was $.94/therm.
I haven't seen much talk about it, but this strikes me as an outrageous
rate
19 matches
Mail list logo
