I am grateful that people like Benjamin Shiller and David Cuetos are
creating public
service videos and atbulations for our general understanding. The Planning
Board
and the Select Board should utilize these useful charts and take theiir
assistance
to sort out issues. . It emerges from the
Hello Louis,
I believe your reference to a scare tactic is not accurate.
Perhaps unlikely to be reached (but who knows once developers get involved
in a "by-right" situation) but these real numbers came from a flawed State
model corrected by David Cuetos. He's the only one I know of who
I don't know whether people are aware that when housing that is part of the
affordable housing program fails to be purchased by a qualifying individual
or family, that housing reverts to market rate and is sold to a market rate
buyer. This happens in Lincoln already. As I understand it, despite
Very helpful but is HCWG and Selects in agreement? Guess we'll find out on
11/21.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023, 9:42 AM Benjamin Shiller wrote:
> I hope recent comments lead to a discussion as to what is the right amount
> of development for Lincoln right now. So far, I feel the argument has been
>
Even in the scare tactics of '1123 max units' that would be pretty sweet
to have an additional, minimum 112 non age restricted affordable rate
units. Basically, you are coming close to same number of actual SHI units
(I mean the number of actual units that are accessible and not just puffed
up
I separated out this part so I could ask the Selects, but thought I would
include Lincoln Talk as well.
Selects/HCAWG:
Is the Dec 2nd "vote" actually binding in any way? For that matter, is the
HCAWG output binding or are they just presenting their work to the Selects
who are the arbitrators of
I hope recent comments lead to a discussion as to what is the right amount
of development for Lincoln right now. So far, I feel the argument has been
binary, assuming that someone either supports housing (to the max) or wants
absolutely zero development and is accused of being a NIMBY. Yet, at
In response to the Selects’ post about the December 2nd Special Town
Meeting, I’d like to pose a follow up question. To quote Andy Wang, “all
the ‘E’ alternatives provided by the Lincoln Residents for Housing
Alternatives are set up so that the majority of the land that is re-zoned
are on existing
