Hello!
I'm planning to get RME Multiface (II) and have a question to it's owners.
Can you, please, post its latency in audio loop, measured with jaaa in
2x64 buffer setup.
Thank you.
Regards,
Dmitry.
P.S. crossposted from LAU, since there were no responces.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:36:34PM +0400, Dmitry Baikov wrote:
Hello!
I'm planning to get RME Multiface (II) and have a question to it's owners.
Can you, please, post its latency in audio loop, measured with jaaa in
2x64 buffer setup.
Better use jdelay for that, that's why it exists !
--
I've been looking for a high-performance music engine. It must have an
asynchronous control (socket, pipe?) mechanism to seperate the
application from the audio thread.
I'm looking for:
start/stop samples on the beat
scaled tempo control across all samples
volume
effects?
easily wrappable (I'll
Lee Revell wrote:
Lately however Creative/EMU's DSP cards have been getting great reviews
(X-Fi, EMU 1212M, etc) - they seem to have fixed a lot of the common
complaints about the SBLive! based devices (crappy codecs, horrible
resampling). And they are still damn cheap ($200-300 tops IIRC) but
Better use jdelay for that, that's why it exists !
Oops, my bad - I mixed up the names...
jdelay, definetely!
P.S. that's why I get no responces - they are still measuring
On 4/6/06, James Courtier-Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creative have actually donated an X-Fi and an EMU1212M to me.
No datasheets, but at least having the hardware is a start. (Creative
pass me some datasheets for other cards though)
I have currently got as far as horrible noises coming
Dmitry Baikov wrote:
On 4/6/06, James Courtier-Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creative have actually donated an X-Fi and an EMU1212M to me.
No datasheets, but at least having the hardware is a start. (Creative
pass me some datasheets for other cards though)
I have currently got as far as
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:50:37PM +0400, Dmitry Baikov wrote:
Better use jdelay for that, that's why it exists !
Oops, my bad - I mixed up the names...
P.S. that's why I get no responces - they are still measuring
It shouldn't take more than a minute...
--
FA
Follie! Follie!
P.S. that's why I get no responces - they are still measuring
It shouldn't take more than a minute...
I mean they are measuring with jaaa ;)
Still hoping to get the info,
Dmitry.
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 04:14 -0800, Patrick Stinson wrote:
I've been looking for a high-performance music engine. It must have an
asynchronous control (socket, pipe?) mechanism to seperate the
application from the audio thread.
I'm looking for:
start/stop samples on the beat
scaled tempo
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 11:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 04:14 -0800, Patrick Stinson wrote:
I've been looking for a high-performance music engine. It must have an
asynchronous control (socket, pipe?) mechanism to seperate the
application from the audio thread.
I'm
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:14:32AM -0800, Patrick Stinson wrote:
I've been looking for a high-performance music engine. It must have an
asynchronous control (socket, pipe?) mechanism to seperate the
application from the audio thread.
Everytime this comes up, i hesitantly recommend GDAM. Its
Dmitry Baikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
P.S. that's why I get no responces - they are still
measuring
Might be because there are no Multiface II's around. Anyway,
here are numbers for a hdsp 9652 + Behringer ada8000 audio
loop, the hdsp has similar core specs down to the FPGA
architecture.
Hi Dmitry,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 14:36 +0400 schrieb Dmitry Baikov:
I'm planning to get RME Multiface (II) and have a question to it's owners.
Can you, please, post its latency in audio loop, measured with jaaa in
2x64 buffer setup.
206.805
This is a Thinkpad T43 with an unpatched
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:28:32PM +0200, Jan Weil wrote:
206.805
This is a Thinkpad T43 with an unpatched 2.6.16 with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y,
jackd 0.100.7, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now what does that value tell me? These are samples, I suppose, i. e.
4.308 msec?
Yep, it's samples.
Fons, how do
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:52:26PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote:
Frankly I think 60+ channels is completely unrealistic (otherwise one
would probably exist), but what do I know. If it's possible, hell yes
put them in there.
The hammerfall will do 52 so I don't see 60+ as that much of a
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 20:52 +0200, fons adriaensen wrote:
Have you been able to use -p 64 with 2.6.16 on the Thinkpad with
ACPI ? I had no problems with it on my R51 when using 2.6.8 (SuSE
9.2), but since 2.6.13 (SuSE 10.0) I have to disable it. Killing the
modules doesn't help, but acpi=off
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:57:28PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 20:52 +0200, fons adriaensen wrote:
Have you been able to use -p 64 with 2.6.16 on the Thinkpad with
ACPI ? I had no problems with it on my R51 when using 2.6.8 (SuSE
9.2), but since 2.6.13 (SuSE 10.0) I have
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 21:25 +0200, fons adriaensen wrote:
Every 40 seconds I get a shower of timeouts in JACK, even when no clients
are running. I suspected the battery check of course, but that is configured
for a 60 second period, and it didn't do any harm before. Killing powersaved
and
Freewheeling is *so* unlike Live its hard to even link the two. Just for
a start, Live is organized around a timeline, Freewheeling is not.
Live does have a freewheeling mode.where you can basically turn on and off
loops and fx, McMusic style. you can record the actions in this mode, and view
Lance Blisters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
GDAM also has seamless queueing of upcoming tracks,
numerous builtin effects and LADSPA and JACK support. You
Is there an available release somewhere with jack support? Am
I missing a magic switch? Jack support, that would be just
awesome.
I have an elder
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 19:40 +, carmen wrote:
Freewheeling is *so* unlike Live its hard to even link the two. Just for
a start, Live is organized around a timeline, Freewheeling is not.
Live does have a freewheeling mode.where you can basically turn on and
off loops and fx, McMusic
Sorry, no release since then. I'm 90% certain that full JACK
support is in CVS already, if not then it'll be in within a
week as i'm planning a big cvs commit binge (purge?) of the
last month's developments. Unfortunately I have no plans
to release but do plan to keep CVS compileable and up to
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:52:26PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote:
Getting that to fly in an FPGA however may be the problem as you start
running into clock speed limits. And an ASIC suffers from the lack of
startup cash.
I've seen a 64 channel interface fit into a single Spartan 2E that was
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:56:23PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
Agreed. We don't need a bunch of useless consumer cruft on a card.
However channels are good, don't downplay channels :). This thing
should have as many channels as possible. Obviously there is a physical
limit to how many you
Lance Blisters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, no release since then. I'm 90% certain that full
JACK support is in CVS already, if not then it'll be in
within a week as i'm planning a big cvs commit binge
(purge?) of the last month's developments. Unfortunately I
have no plans to release but do
My Delta66 has latency of 188 samples.
In theory, Multiface's could have the same results, but it definetely
should do more buffering to send values to breakout box.
As Jan measured, there is a little: ~207 vs 188.
Thank you!
Dmitry.
P.S. if only EMU 1616M had linux drivers...
At least RME has
carmen wrote:
Freewheeling is *so* unlike Live its hard to even link the two. Just for
a start, Live is organized around a timeline, Freewheeling is not.
Live does have a freewheeling mode.where you can basically turn on and off
loops and fx, McMusic style. you can record the actions in this
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 23:18 +0200, Albert Graef wrote:
Anyway, having something like Ableton Live on Linux would be a great
boon, it's the one single program that I still run Windows for. But
IMHO recreating that from scratch as open source for Linux is a HUGE
project, something of the order
I heard from someone at Ableton that one guy wrote the Live engine in
about 3 months.
yeah its not that complex. all you need is something that can play audio files
realtime at varying pitches/speeds and apply FX chains, and a GUI to facilitate
the arrangement and FX parameterization..
i was
Lee Revell wrote:
I heard from someone at Ableton that one guy wrote the Live engine in
about 3 months.
He must be a great hacker. :) But the engine is probably only a small
part of the program. Getting the UI right is an entirely different issue.
Albert
--
Dr. Albert Graf
Dept. of
Nice work with that screenshot.
The hard part is finding an engine that appears light-weight to the
application code. The engine has to never xrun, and allow me to make
calls like sound.set_tempo(140.0), sound.start_on_beat(2345), and
channel.set_volume(.678) without worrying about threads.
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 14:07 -0800, Patrick Stinson wrote:
BTW, I write for touchscreens, so I want an Ableton Live with big
freakin widgets!
Man, would it ever revolutionize live computer audio if touchscreens
become cheap...
Lee
33 matches
Mail list logo
