Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

2006-07-21 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 01:13:43 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 21 Jul, 2006 at 09:39AM +1000, Loki Davison spake thus: On 7/21/06, Stephen Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... For music/audio stuff you can do the dsp stuff with c and then communicate with another process written

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

2006-07-21 Thread Steve Harris
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:51:05 -0700, Thomas Vecchione wrote: ??? Non realtime style? How can you have a gui written in a real time style? Doesn't that kind of break the basic rules of realtime? Well that is my question, sorry I should have clarified I am just now getting into realtime

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [OT] Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

2006-07-21 Thread Albert Graef
Stephen Sinclair wrote: Does anyone know any interesting and powerful languages that can be used just like C? That can link to C libraries, and can be compiled to native machine code, and can express the same low-level concepts as C, but in a more powerful and intuitive way? In short, does

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] New specimen list and home

2006-07-21 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
Hello all, I've set up a mailing list for specimen: http://zhevny.com/mailman/listinfo/specimen Additionally the web site now lives at http://zhevny.com/specimen. This is a minimal re-working of Pete's old site. More improvements to follow. Let me know if anything is badly broken. (I know the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

2006-07-21 Thread Thomas Vecchione
What is important however is that the latency is constant, jitter is quite obvious. Makes sense, how often is jitter in that regards a problem and if it is a decent amount of time, what might be done to help with that problem? MIDI latency is typically 1ms or so, and that's generally not a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FYI: GUADEC 2006 Sound BOF

2006-07-21 Thread Lee Revell
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 12:00 +0200, Jan Weil wrote: Apparently, a Sound BOF took place at GUADEC 2006 http://guadec.org/GUADEC2006. Slides that were presented: http://etudiant.epita.fr/~lureau_m/GUADEC06-Audio-BOF/ It seems that PulseAudio http://pulseaudio.org/, formerly known as

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

2006-07-21 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Thomas Vecchione hat gesagt: // Thomas Vecchione wrote: my PDA). But yes OSC is definitely looking like a good possibility. Of course I haven't looked to see if there is an OSC lib for my PDA much less most PDAs;) liblo runs on PDAs. Check out the asciimatrix by Martin Rumori and

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FYI: GUADEC 2006 Sound BOF

2006-07-21 Thread carmen
Great. One of the bullet points on the Future directions slide is Professional audio?. So it was not designed for professional use from the ground up. If Apple can design a single sound system that's usable for desktop toys AND pro audio why can't we? kde4 will be using 'phonon', an

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FYI: GUADEC 2006 Sound BOF

2006-07-21 Thread Christoph Eckert
If Apple can design a single sound system that's usable for desktop toys AND pro audio why can't we? sigh :) . Cheers, ce

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

2006-07-21 Thread Dave Robillard
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 12:32 -0700, Thomas Vecchione wrote: If your thinking of using a UDPish protocol, please use OSC. Was definitely considering it. I suppose my question there might be, while I don't have intentions for it currently, I don't want to rule out the possibility of the FE

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FYI: GUADEC 2006 Sound BOF

2006-07-21 Thread Dave Robillard
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 16:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 12:00 +0200, Jan Weil wrote: Apparently, a Sound BOF took place at GUADEC 2006 http://guadec.org/GUADEC2006. Slides that were presented: http://etudiant.epita.fr/~lureau_m/GUADEC06-Audio-BOF/ It seems that