Marc-Olivier Barre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LAA
Isn't an RSS feed more suitable for this?
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
sip:b0ef@ e e
jid:b0ef@
On 3/6/07, Esben Stien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc-Olivier Barre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LAA
Isn't an RSS feed more suitable for this?
This looks like a good old why not have forums question ;-)
Can you post an answer to an RSS feed ? nope. With LAA, one can reply
to LAU or LAD to add
On 3/5/07, Ivica Ico Bukvic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Two more question have been raised in another thread :
Wouldn't it be easier then to subscribe the consortium list address to
LAA?
Agreed, it would be very easy... Ico, comments are welcome.
Sorry, I missed this one. Would this
Hi,
Two more question have been raised in another thread :
Wouldn't it be easier then to subscribe the consortium list address to
LAA?
Agreed, it would be very easy... Ico, comments are welcome.
And by the way, it's been considered good practice to cross-post
announcements to LAA, LAU, and
-Original Message-
From: Marc-Olivier Barre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:11 AM
To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List; A list for linux audio users
Cc: Ivica Ico Bukvic
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] List migration to linuxaudio.org :
remaining
Hi everyone,
As I said yesterday when I said the migration to linuxaudio.org was
postponed till 1st April, there are still a few issues asking for
comments.
It has been suggested by a few people(Ivica Ico Bukvic, Jan Weil) that
the email addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] was kind of
redundant. The
Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:
Hi everyone,
As I said yesterday when I said the migration to linuxaudio.org was
postponed till 1st April, there are still a few issues asking for
comments.
It has been suggested by a few people(Ivica Ico Bukvic, Jan Weil) that
the email addresses [EMAIL
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailing-list), etc. (but that's not catchy enough)
or lad,
On 3/1/07, Robin Gareus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, right...
a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailing-list), etc. (but that's not catchy enough)
Agreed
I'd
On 3/1/07, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:
On 3/1/07, Robin Gareus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, right...
a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailing-list), etc. (but that's
On 3/1/07, Marc-Olivier Barre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(at least for
dictionary based random spam if such a thing exists, and I have no
doubt it does).
I can verify that it certainly does exist. But the lists are
subscribers only right?
Lee
On 3/1/07, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/1/07, Marc-Olivier Barre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(at least for
dictionary based random spam if such a thing exists, and I have no
doubt it does).
I can verify that it certainly does exist. But the lists are
subscribers only right?
13 matches
Mail list logo
