PS: does anyone know where I can 'GPL' an decent OSC server
implementation in C++?
The LibLo implementation is GPL, very easy to use, and available in many
distros including Ubuntu.
http://liblo.sourceforge.net/
I'm using it for a project and it seems very good.
I think having an
On 28 Feb 2007, at 17:29, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
PS: does anyone know where I can 'GPL' an decent OSC server
implementation in C++?
The LibLo implementation is GPL, very easy to use, and available in
many distros including Ubuntu.
http://liblo.sourceforge.net/
I'm using it for a
Stephen Sinclair wrote:
I think having an OSC-controlled audio back-end is a Good Thing.
Agree++
Best,
dp
tisdag 27 februari 2007 22:13 skrev Dominique Michel:
Another problem with Qt/KDE is dcop. It work well inside KDE but produce
more warning or error messages in the logs as useful effects on another
wm's as kde. Again, it is not what I call professional.
That might be the case but it is on
Loki Davison wrote:
On 2/27/07, Pieter Palmers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loki Davison wrote:
On 2/27/07, Pieter Palmers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonard Ritter wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better
Dominique Michel wrote:
Le Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:41:08 +0100,
Another problem with Qt/KDE is dcop. It work well inside KDE but produce more
warning or error messages in the logs as useful effects on another wm's as kde.
Again, it is not what I call professional.
(please don't consider this as
Le Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:19:19 +,
Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Dominique Michel wrote:
Le Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:41:08 +0100,
Leonard Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to
Le Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:37:37 +0100,
Dominique Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Le Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:19:19 +,
Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Dominique Michel wrote:
Le Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:41:08 +0100,
Leonard Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Thu,
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:14 +0100, Pieter Palmers wrote:
I personally have an issue with this professional requirement,
especially if it is about these 'details'.
on a sidenote, when approaching the what is professional discussion, i
like to tell about the coincidence that in german, another
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:45:18PM +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Monday 26 Feb 2007 23:40, Leonard Ritter wrote:
radial is for weirdos with the motor skills of a clockmaker.
Correct! But where have all the radial supporters gone? There were
enough to sustain quite a flamewar about this a
En/na Chris Cannam ha escrit:
I've been considering making a small library of Qt4 widgets based on the
ones in the current SVN of Sonic Visualiser -- dial (based on the
RG/qsynth one), thumbwheel, panner, fader (based on Hydrogen).
They aren't particularly beautiful or consistent to look at
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:09:18AM +0100, Leonard Ritter wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 11:12 +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
well. when in finetuning mode, the slider obstructs other gui elements.
I'm hoping to some day, maybe later this year, find a way to make
fansliders translucent ...
besides
On 3/1/07, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:09:18AM +0100, Leonard Ritter wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 11:12 +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
well. when in finetuning mode, the slider obstructs other gui elements.
I'm hoping to some day, maybe later this
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 11:12 +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
and i'm happy with putting this stuff into phat / pyphat if you are.
give it some more time. when i made my first synth layouts with it, i'll
contribute.
Though i'm more keen to get everyone to use
fansliders for everything because i
Loki Davison wrote:
On 2/27/07, Pieter Palmers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonard Ritter wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better documentation and support. Not that GTK is terrible, it's just
not as
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 11:01 +0100, Pieter Palmers wrote:
The renders panels from stylesheets is what I am referring to. Phat
is
has very nice widgets, but AFAIK it stops before the container
level.
That's where the widget 'system' comes in: a system that manages
widgets
such that you
On Monday 26 Feb 2007 23:40, Leonard Ritter wrote:
radial is for weirdos with the motor skills of a clockmaker.
Correct! But where have all the radial supporters gone? There were
enough to sustain quite a flamewar about this a couple of years back.
I prefer linear in both axes (right or up
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 15:45 +, Chris Cannam wrote:
[...] But what they do do is work consistently: click and drag to
adjust, without any inadvertant jumps on plain clicks; double-click to
open a text field edit window provided by the widget;
You could have a single text-field for the
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:45:18PM +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Monday 26 Feb 2007 23:40, Leonard Ritter wrote:
radial is for weirdos with the motor skills of a clockmaker.
Correct! But where have all the radial supporters gone? There were
enough to sustain quite a flamewar about this a
Chris Cannam wrote:
On Monday 26 Feb 2007 23:40, Leonard Ritter wrote:
radial is for weirdos with the motor skills of a clockmaker.
Correct! But where have all the radial supporters gone? There were
enough to sustain quite a flamewar about this a couple of years back.
I prefer
On Tuesday 27 Feb 2007 17:22, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Looked at Ardour 2 recently?
Yes. I like the new fader/meter.
Chris
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:45:18PM +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Monday 26 Feb 2007 23:40, Leonard Ritter wrote:
radial is for weirdos with the motor skills of a clockmaker.
Correct! But where have all the radial supporters gone? There were
Le Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:41:08 +0100,
Leonard Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better documentation and support. Not that GTK is terrible, it's just
not as polished or
Dominique Michel wrote:
Le Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:41:08 +0100,
Leonard Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better documentation and support. Not that GTK is terrible, it's just
not
On 2/27/07, Pieter Palmers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loki Davison wrote:
On 2/27/07, Pieter Palmers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonard Ritter wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better documentation and
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better documentation and support. Not that GTK is terrible, it's just
not as polished or professional.
the enemy of the good is the better.
i, for one, used the past 3 days to
Leonard Ritter wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better documentation and support. Not that GTK is terrible, it's just
not as polished or professional.
the enemy of the good is the better.
i, for one, used
here is a demo showing the three widgets DecoBox, Knob and LCD, with
different settings applied.
http://www.paniq.org/images/audiogui5.png
Absolutely beautiful, thanks for making this!
I got the code from
http://svn.zeitherrschaft.org/aldrin/trunk
and got some errors (pasted in at the
Hi
Very nice!!
Is the 'WTF' the volume control :
Cheers
Bob
On 26/02/07, Leonard Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better documentation and support. Not that GTK is
måndag 26 februari 2007 14:20 skrev Frank Smith:
Hi
Very nice!!
Dito
Is the 'WTF' the volume control :
Must be Whats The Fuzz. Can't imagine what else :-D
--
- Bengan
- KTHNOC - No1 Internet Offspring |
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 13:32 +, James McDermott wrote:
and got some errors (pasted in at the end), but the GUI mostly
appeared. This is just a bug report, I don't need to see a fix.
yes, i suppose this is version collision. i need those commands tho. i
use cairo 1.3.14 and python-cairo 1.2.0
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 16:24 +0100, Bengt Gördén wrote:
måndag 26 februari 2007 14:20 skrev Frank Smith:
Hi
Very nice!!
Dito
thank you!
Is the 'WTF' the volume control :
Must be Whats The Fuzz. Can't imagine what else :-D
It's the War on Terror Filter of course!
--
Leonard
On 2/26/07, Leonard Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 13:32 +, James McDermott wrote:
and got some errors (pasted in at the end), but the GUI mostly
appeared. This is just a bug report, I don't need to see a fix.
yes, i suppose this is version collision. i need those
On Monday 26 Feb 2007 12:41, Leonard Ritter wrote:
(i dare you to start an audio ui design war with me).
Radial or linear mouse control for the dials?
Chris
ducks and runs for cover
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 21:35 +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Monday 26 Feb 2007 12:41, Leonard Ritter wrote:
(i dare you to start an audio ui design war with me).
Radial or linear mouse control for the dials?
check it out. it's y-linear. radial is for weirdos with the motor skills
of a
On 2/27/07, Leonard Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 21:35 +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Monday 26 Feb 2007 12:41, Leonard Ritter wrote:
(i dare you to start an audio ui design war with me).
Radial or linear mouse control for the dials?
check it out. it's y-linear.
On 2/27/07, Pieter Palmers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonard Ritter wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 06:42 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I can say that the QT package is much easier to use and has
better documentation and support. Not that GTK is terrible, it's just
not as polished or professional.
37 matches
Mail list logo
