On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:22:08PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
[ on linux-ha,
a lot of stuff about why I think we don't even want that feature,
or at least not how it is implemented ]
This post is related, but about the implementation bugs in the current
implementation as I spotted them.
Hello.My system os is Centos 6.4 X64,when I install corosync and pacemaker
using this command(as offical document guide):
yum -y install corosync* pacemaker*
but I can't find crm command. why?
help me!
Tks!Best regards!
the following is some information
[root@slave log]# uname -a
Linux slave
On 2013-05-12T12:33:05, zhangyan cnr...@163.com wrote:
Hello.My system os is Centos 6.4 X64,when I install corosync and pacemaker
using this command(as offical document guide):
yum -y install corosync* pacemaker*
but I can't find crm command. why?
RHT has decided to not ship the crm
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:30:00PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-12T12:33:05, zhangyan cnr...@163.com wrote:
Hello.My system os is Centos 6.4 X64,when I install corosync and pacemaker
using this command(as offical document guide):
yum -y install corosync* pacemaker*
This is about pull request
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/222
Merge redhat lvm.sh feature set into heartbeat LVM agent
Apologies to the CC for list duplicates. Cc list was made by looking at
the comments in the pull request, and some previous off-list thread.
Even though
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Cc: David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com, Fabio M. Di Nitto
fdini...@redhat.com, Andrew Beekhof
and...@beekhof.net, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com, Lon Hohberger
l...@redhat.com,
Hi all,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:22:08PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
This is about pull request
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/222
Merge redhat lvm.sh feature set into heartbeat LVM agent
Apologies to the CC for list duplicates. Cc list was made by looking at
the
On 2013-05-14T09:54:55, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's what it comes down to. You aren't guaranteed exclusive
activation just because pacemaker is in control. There are scenarios
with SAN disks where the node starts up and can potentially attempt to
activate a volume before
On 2013-05-14T15:59:05, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Appart from a larger restructuring of the code,
For which I'd still like to hear a good explanation. Mind, this
is not to say that this or that version is better, but that such
a huge change calls for a serious effort on
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 04:06:09PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-14T09:54:55, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's what it comes down to. You aren't guaranteed exclusive
activation just because pacemaker is in control. There are scenarios
with SAN disks where the
- Original Message -
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com
Cc: Fabio M. Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com, General Linux-HA mailing
list linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org,
Jonathan Brassow jbras...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 9:50:43 AM
11 matches
Mail list logo
