Re: [Linux-HA] Clone colocation missing? (was: Pacemaker 1.19 cannot manage more than 127 resources)

2013-09-14 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-09-13T17:48:40, Tom Parker tpar...@cbnco.com wrote: Hi Feri I agree that it should be necessary but for some reason it works well the way it is and everything starts in the correct order. Maybe someone on the dev list can explain a little bit better why this is working. It may

Re: [Linux-HA] Clone colocation missing? (was: Pacemaker 1.19 cannot manage more than 127 resources)

2013-09-13 Thread Tom Parker
Hi Feri I agree that it should be necessary but for some reason it works well the way it is and everything starts in the correct order. Maybe someone on the dev list can explain a little bit better why this is working. It may have something to do with the fact that it's a clone instead of a

Re: [Linux-HA] Clone colocation missing? (was: Pacemaker 1.19 cannot manage more than 127 resources)

2013-09-05 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Tom Parker tpar...@cbnco.com writes: I have attached my original crm config with 201 primitives to this e-mail. Hi, Sorry to sidetrack this thread, but I really wonder why you only have order constraints for your Xen resources, without any colocation constraints. After all, they can only