gt;sb_fname, XFSLABEL_MAX);
+ strscpy_pad(label, sbp->sb_fname);
spin_unlock(>m_sb_lock);
if (copy_to_user(user_label, label, sizeof(label)))
---
base-commit: c85af715cac0a951eea97393378e84bb49384734
change-id: 20240405-strncpy-xfs-split1-a2c408b934c6
Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt
t += prefix_len + namelen + 1;
---
base-commit: c85af715cac0a951eea97393378e84bb49384734
change-id: 20240405-strncpy-xattr-split2-0a3aff0c6a20
Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt
On 4/5/24 12:07, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 10:08:00AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 3/26/24 03:51, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
Hi,
This patch series teaches KUnit to handle kthread faults as errors, and
it brings a few related fixes and improvements.
Shuah, everything should be
usercopy: Kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to SLUB object 'kmalloc-16'
(offset 8, size 9)!
We tried to copy 9 bytes into the f_handle[] array.
But from my reading of the reproducer, f_handle.handle_bytes was set to 1.
Aneesh, any thoughts on this?
This was previously reported:
On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 10:40:30 -0700 syzbot
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit:c0b832517f62 Add linux-next specific files for 20240402
> git tree: linux-next
> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13a5c3b118
> kernel
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 10:08:00AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 3/26/24 03:51, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series teaches KUnit to handle kthread faults as errors, and
> > it brings a few related fixes and improvements.
> >
> > Shuah, everything should be OK now, could you
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit:c0b832517f62 Add linux-next specific files for 20240402
git tree: linux-next
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13a5c3b118
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=afcaf46d374cec8c
On 3/26/24 03:51, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
Hi,
This patch series teaches KUnit to handle kthread faults as errors, and
it brings a few related fixes and improvements.
Shuah, everything should be OK now, could you please merge this series?
Please cc linux-kselftest and kunit mailing lists. You
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:21:57PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 04-04-24 14:12:15, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Since __counted_by(handle_bytes) was added to struct file_handle, we need
> > to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
> > accessing the flex array "f_handle".
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 18:56 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > "checkpatch.pl --strict" complains "CHECK: Alignment should match open
> > parenthesis". I'll queue the patch, but how about teaching checkpatch.pl to
> > ignore __struct_group()?
>
> I think this would do it:
>
> diff --git
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:19:00AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 03-04-24 14:54:03, Kees Cook wrote:
> > With adding __counted_by(handle_bytes) to struct file_handle, we need
> > to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
> > accessing the flex array "f_handle".
> >
On Thu 04-04-24 14:12:15, Kees Cook wrote:
> Since __counted_by(handle_bytes) was added to struct file_handle, we need
> to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
> accessing the flex array "f_handle". For robustness also check for a
> negative value for handle_bytes,
On 04/04/2024 21:41, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 2/12/24 18:26, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 12/02/2024 14:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Add support for Sony Xperia 1 V, a.k.a PDX234. This device is a part
of the SoMC SM8550 Yodo platform.
[...]
+/* TODO: Only one SID of PMR735D seems accessible? */
13 matches
Mail list logo
