On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:19:00AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 03-04-24 14:54:03, Kees Cook wrote:
> > With adding __counted_by(handle_bytes) to struct file_handle, we need
> > to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
> > accessing the flex array "f_handle".
> >
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 11:19:00AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 03-04-24 14:54:03, Kees Cook wrote:
> > With adding __counted_by(handle_bytes) to struct file_handle, we need
> > to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
> > accessing the flex array "f_handle".
> >
On Wed 03-04-24 14:54:03, Kees Cook wrote:
> With adding __counted_by(handle_bytes) to struct file_handle, we need
> to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
> accessing the flex array "f_handle".
>
> Fixes: 1b43c4629756 ("fs: Annotate struct file_handle with
On 03/04/24 15:54, Kees Cook wrote:
With adding __counted_by(handle_bytes) to struct file_handle, we need
to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
accessing the flex array "f_handle".
Yes, which (access to `f_handle`) happens here:
48 retval =
With adding __counted_by(handle_bytes) to struct file_handle, we need
to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
accessing the flex array "f_handle".
Fixes: 1b43c4629756 ("fs: Annotate struct file_handle with __counted_by() and
use struct_size()")
Signed-off-by: Kees
