On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 08:18:01PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/14, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 06:55:55PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > We want to check the "flags" argument at the start, we do not want to
> > > delay the "case 0:" check until we have
On 02/14, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 06:55:55PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > We want to check the "flags" argument at the start, we do not want to
> > delay the "case 0:" check until we have f.file (so that we can check
> > f.file->f_flags).
>
> Fair point. I was
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:18:01PM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:59:37PM -0800, coverity-bot wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by
> > Coverity from a scan of next-20240213 as part of the linux-next scan
> >
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 06:55:55PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hi Tycho,
>
> let me repeat just in case, I am fine either way, whatever you and
> Christian prefer. In particular, I agree in advance if you decide
> to not change the current code, it is correct even if it can fool
> the tools.
>
Hi Tycho,
let me repeat just in case, I am fine either way, whatever you and
Christian prefer. In particular, I agree in advance if you decide
to not change the current code, it is correct even if it can fool
the tools.
That said,
On 02/14, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > On 02/13, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > >
> > > I think this is a false positive, we have:
> >
> > Agreed,
> >
> > > That said, a default case wouldn't hurt, and we should fix the first
> > >
On 02/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 02/13, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >
> > I think this is a false positive, we have:
>
> Agreed,
>
> > That said, a default case wouldn't hurt, and we should fix the first
> > comment anyways, since now we have extensions.
> >
> > I'm happy to send a patch or maybe
On 02/13, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> I think this is a false positive, we have:
Agreed,
> That said, a default case wouldn't hurt, and we should fix the first
> comment anyways, since now we have extensions.
>
> I'm happy to send a patch or maybe it's better for Christian to fix it
> in-tree.
I
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:59:37PM -0800, coverity-bot wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by
> Coverity from a scan of next-20240213 as part of the linux-next scan project:
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan
>
> You're
Hello!
This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by
Coverity from a scan of next-20240213 as part of the linux-next scan project:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan
You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified
lines of
10 matches
Mail list logo
