Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] PKS write protected page tables

2024-03-15 Thread Boris Lukashev
IIRC shoot-downs are one of the reasons for using per-cpu PGDs, which can in-turn enable/underpin other hardening functions... presuming the churn of recent years has softened attitudes toward such core MM changes. https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=15=29661 -Boris On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] PKS write protected page tables

2024-03-14 Thread Ira Weiny
Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > On Thu, 2024-03-14 at 09:27 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 04:59:08PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > > > This is a second RFC for the PKS write protected tables concept. > > > I'm sharing to > > > show the progress to interested people. I'd also

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] PKS write protected page tables

2024-03-14 Thread Edgecombe, Rick P
On Thu, 2024-03-14 at 09:27 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 04:59:08PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > > This is a second RFC for the PKS write protected tables concept. > > I'm sharing to > > show the progress to interested people. I'd also appreciate any > > comments, > >

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] PKS write protected page tables

2024-03-14 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 04:59:08PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > This is a second RFC for the PKS write protected tables concept. I'm sharing > to > show the progress to interested people. I'd also appreciate any comments, > especially on the direct map page table protection solution (patch 17).