This is a reminder that the Tel Aviv Linux Club (
http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/telux/ ) will hear Elizabeth Sterling talk about
Setting up and Managing an Apache server on Sunday 25-February-2007 (Today).
The presentation will take place at 18:30, in Shenkar 222 (Physics and
Astronomy building) in
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 19:17 +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 16:27, Zvi Har'El wrote:
I use the extension User Agent Switcher
(http://chrispederick.com/work/useragentswitcher/) to access their site :'(
That never worked for me on the Isracard site (and as a result
Thanks, so here's a little something I wrapped arount that (the script
assumes sendsms.pl is in your path and that you have setup its
configuration file):
#!/bin/bash
: ${DIALOG=dialog}
get_phones()
{
exec 31
value=$(${DIALOG} --title Send SMS --clear --ok-label continue \
--form
On Monday, 26.2, the Haifa Linux Club, will gather to hear Rami Rosen
speaks about
Open Solaris
abstract:
Sun had released Open Solaris about a year and a half ago ,under CDDL
license; It is probably going to be changed soon to GPLv3 (See:
There was a question about business perspective of MySQL vs. PostgreSQL...
As far as I can tell , MySQL is not free for commercial distribution. It's
only free if you use it yourself or as part of some Open Source
distribution.
Correct me if I'm wrong (am I reading MySQL license wrong?)
-Alex
On Sunday 25 February 2007 16:09, Alex Dover wrote:
There was a question about business perspective of MySQL vs. PostgreSQL...
As far as I can tell , MySQL is not free for commercial distribution. It's
only free if you use it yourself or as part of some Open Source
distribution.
Correct me if
On Friday 23 February 2007 02:11, Amos Shapira wrote:
Assuming the above (i.e. files are mostly not written concurrently by
multiple processes), maybe you can try to track write(2) system calls.
Mulli's old syscalltack (http://syscalltrack.sourceforge.net/) should have
been able to do this for
Quoting Tzahi Fadida, from the post of Sun, 25 Feb:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 16:09, Alex Dover wrote:
There was a question about business perspective of MySQL vs. PostgreSQL...
As far as I can tell , MySQL is not free for commercial distribution. It's
only free if you use it yourself or
Quoting Peter, from the post of Sat, 24 Feb:
I am not a xenophobe I am a rudephobe. There are 2 to 4 rudes and 50
you were not talking about rude people, you were talking about how you
fear for the safety of your cellphone and wallet every time you have to
talk to an Israeli on the street.
Hello,
Can anyone recommend israel-available credit card service with
firefox-compliant web interface?
--
Arieh
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Tzahi Fadida, from the post of Sun, 25 Feb:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 16:09, Alex Dover wrote:
There was a question about business perspective of MySQL vs. PostgreSQL...
As far as I can tell , MySQL is not free for commercial distribution.
On Sunday, 25 בFebruary 2007 16:39, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 16:09, Alex Dover wrote:
As far as I can tell , MySQL is not free for commercial distribution.
Correct me if I'm wrong (am I reading MySQL license wrong?)
And, PostgreSQL is free in that regard since it has a
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Peter, from the post of Sat, 24 Feb:
I am not a xenophobe I am a rudephobe. There are 2 to 4 rudes and 50
you were not talking about rude people, you were talking about how you
fear for the safety of your cellphone and wallet every time you
El dom, 25-02-2007 a las 11:40 +0200, Gilboa Davara escribió:
FYI, IE4sLinux has a beta version that supports IE7. (I've played with
it a bit - and it seems to work just fine.)
Do you can write nativelly in Hebrew on it without pasting up from other
application?
Using ie6 under Wine I have
Quoting guy keren, from the post of Sun, 25 Feb:
Didn't MySQL used to be plublished under dual licenses? either GPL or
embedded?
it still is. however, the other license is commercial - i.e. you need to
pay $$$ for that.
Choo, You've been in this business a long time, I expect more of
Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting guy keren, from the post of Sun, 25 Feb:
Didn't MySQL used to be plublished under dual licenses? either GPL or
embedded?
it still is. however, the other license is commercial - i.e. you need to
pay $$$ for that.
Choo, You've been in this business a long time, I
A dual license means you can choose which license you want to use the
product under. If you choose GPL, it's GPL all the way, you can
redistribute it with source in any way you want along with any product
you want, propriatery or open. dynamicly linking with GPL libraries is
also fine,
One thing we need to remember GPL CAN BE COMMERCIAL!
People are confusing between commercial and propriatry.
In MySQL if your software is GPL you do not need to pay. (remember you may
sell GPL so GPL is also commercial).
If your software is under another FLOSS license you can still use MySQL
This is exactly the point I was making - you can't just use GPL in MySQL
case - there're additional restrictions (use in proprietary product).
Which makes it unusable for most proprietary commercial use and that's a
reason to use PostgreSQL instead,which doesn't have such restrictions due to
its'
On Monday, 26 בFebruary 2007 08:52, Alex Dover wrote:
If you read the MySQL licensing carefully, you'll see that the dual
licensing of MySQL is not valid if you distribute it with commercial
applications, even if you don't touch the original code.Look at this page:
Why don't you read the *whole* sentence you pointed to:
For OEMs, ISVs, and VARs who distribute MySQL with their products, and
do not license and distribute their source code under the GPL, MySQL
provides a flexible OEM Commercial License.
OK, I'll put it in bold so you can see it:
guy keren wrote:
A dual license means you can choose which license you want to use the
product under. If you choose GPL, it's GPL all the way, you can
redistribute it with source in any way you want along with any product
you want, propriatery or open. dynamicly linking with GPL libraries is
No, this is a reason to write Free Software :-)
You should use the product which is best for your application.
Since I am not an expert in Databases, I prefer not to comment about using
either of these products.
I do think that using open source is better for both the customer and the
vendor,
On 2/26/07, Oron Peled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, 26 בFebruary 2007 08:52, Alex Dover wrote:
If you read the MySQL licensing carefully, you'll see that the dual
licensing of MySQL is not valid if you distribute it with commercial
applications, even if you don't touch the original
On 2/26/07, Alex Dover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you read the *whole* sentence you pointed to:
For OEMs, ISVs, and VARs who distribute MySQL with their products,
and
do not license and distribute their source code under the GPL, MySQL
provides a flexible OEM Commercial
On Monday, 26 בFebruary 2007 09:18, Alex Dover wrote:
This is exactly the point I was making - you can't just use GPL in MySQL
case - there're additional restrictions (use in proprietary product).
Nothing is additional. No GPL software can be proprietary. Period.
Which makes it unusable for
Alex Dover wrote:
If you read the MySQL licensing carefully, you'll see that the dual
licensing of MySQL is not valid if you distribute it with commercial
applications, even if you don't touch the original code.Look at this
page:
http://www.mysql.com/company/legal/licensing/index.html
27 matches
Mail list logo
