On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed for,
well, embedding.
Correct. As plain text has no concept of a paragraph, using \n, \n\n,
\r\n, \r\n\r\n, or any other convention for a paragraph is
On 06/25/2012 01:42 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed for,
well, embedding.
Correct.
Good. But
As plain text has no concept of a paragraph,
Well, that really
Schachar, I before addressing the issue at hand, I would like to state
an observation. When I reply to your mail, all text is of the same
quote level. That is, there is a single gt at the beginning of each
line, whether it is a line that you wrote or a line that I wrote.
Obviously, I am replying
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:42:20 +0300
From: Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
[...] plain text has no concept of a paragraph [...]
That's not true. The UBA explicitly defines a paragraph as chunk of
text delimited by paragraph separator characters:
Paragraphs
On 06/25/2012 06:21 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Schachar, I before addressing the issue at hand, I would like to state
an observation. When I reply to your mail, all text is of the same
quote level. That is, there is a single gt at the beginning of each
line, whether it is a line that you wrote or
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:19:01 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
\r\n, \r\n\r\n, or any other convention for a paragraph is arbitrary.
Technically true, but both irrelevant and misleading. Misleading because
the choice of \n or \r\n was arbitrary,
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:21:25 +0300
From: Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
So we have established that sections of text separated by newlines are
paragraphs. Let us return to the issue. In a plain text file, as
defined above, there does exist a method by which
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:02:48 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Therefore there is no
need for HTML to send RTL emails, nor is there technical need for the
email client to guess.
Except there so no standard, de-facto or otherwise (as far as
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:06:14 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
What the standard[1] suggests, but does not
require, is the use of the first strong directional character in the
paragraph.
You are wrong, it does require that. See below.
the
On 06/25/2012 08:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:02:48 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Therefore there is no
need for HTML to send RTL emails, nor is there technical need for the
email client to guess.
Except there so no
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:00:07 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
CC: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
On 06/25/2012 08:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:02:48 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Therefore there is no
Hi
Does anybody know/use any good, open source software for hosting a gallery
on a web server?
Ideally it should be:
- indexed
- searchable
- easy to browse/navigate
- have author pages
- links to the same artwork in several sizes
- and of course have different functionality for
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Mordechai Behar
mordecha.be...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Hi
Does anybody know/use any good, open source software for hosting a gallery
on a web server?
Ideally it should be:
- indexed
- searchable
- easy to browse/navigate
- have author pages
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Shachar Shemesh wrote about Re: Linux HTML mail agent
with RTL and LTR paragraph explicit support:
I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed
for, well, embedding. What the standard[1] suggests, but does not
require, is the use of the first
On 06/25/2012 09:56 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Outlook employs a higher level protocol. It is all paragraphs are LTR,
unless the user presses CTRL+RIGHT SHIFT, in which case all paragraphs
are RTL. It is a valid, standard conforming protocol
Again, I think such an interpretation is against the
On 06/25/2012 11:22 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Shachar Shemesh wrote about Re: Linux HTML mail agent
with RTL and LTR paragraph explicit support:
I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed
for, well, embedding. What the standard[1] suggests, but
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:22:03 +0300
From: Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Shachar Shemesh wrote about Re: Linux HTML mail agent
with RTL and LTR paragraph explicit support:
I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed
for, well,
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:12:01 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
CC: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
On 06/25/2012 09:56 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Outlook employs a higher level protocol. It is all paragraphs are LTR,
unless the user presses CTRL+RIGHT SHIFT, in which case all
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:28:33 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
no standard really specified what in a text file is a
paragraph.
And lucky for you that they don't. Even with the simple case of a plain
text file, a paragraph is defined
19 matches
Mail list logo
