Re: Cloud Backup

2013-05-16 Thread Dotan Cohen
Nadav, Amazon has a special service made just for this: http://aws.amazon.com/glacier/pricing/ The trick with Glacier is that the data is stored _offline_. That means two things: 1) It is actually more failure-redundant than EBS, S3, or rsync.net 2) You get your data about an hour _after_ you

Re: Cloud Backup

2013-05-16 Thread Steve Litt
On Thu, 16 May 2013 07:50:36 +0300 Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il wrote: On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, Nadav Har'El wrote about Cloud Backup: Hi, I'm looking for a cloud backup solution for Linux, where I'll be able to use rsync, sftp (and similar utilities) to a remote server to back up by

Re: Cloud Backup

2013-05-16 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Thu, May 16, 2013, Dotan Cohen wrote about Re: Cloud Backup: Nadav, Amazon has a special service made just for this: http://aws.amazon.com/glacier/pricing/ Well, Glacier indeed appears to be great service, but it's not very convenient to back up a Linux machine with it. I was looking for

Re: Cloud Backup

2013-05-16 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Thu, May 16, 2013, Steve Litt wrote about Re: Cloud Backup: If anyone was following this thread, I'll give you the latest news. rsync.net just announced (see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5638295) that during May, they sell 50 GB of quota for $60 a year. I switched to this