Damn you people are stiff Humor is a good thing, even for a geek :)
Lighten up, smell the bits...
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 10:47 +0200, Jacob Broido wrote:
noobs should die.
*Sigh*
- Gilboa
noobs should die.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
While referring a new Linux user to the Linux-il mailing list, I found
this text on the page:
No newbie questions (use gnubies-il instead).
Can the lists be merged? This list is low enough traffic
Last time I've checked the developer seems preoccupied with his 'paying job'
and the project seems to be stuck.
On Feb 3, 2008 5:26 AM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008 9:01 PM, Tom Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hear ZFS is available on Linux. Anyone has any
I agree with Hetz, it really depends on the use scenario of the FS.
On a side note, if its a viable platform(solaris), I'd consider seriously
ZFS. ZFS IMHO is one of the best FS's today.
I can say from a personal experience that ZFS works well with large
volumes(10TB+) (both size wise and inode
script(1)
On Nov 21, 2007 3:46 PM, Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a program (I knew it once) that saves to a log file
every command written on a terminal, as well as its results. I need it
so that when I'm instructing a class, I can then give them a log of
or use screen(1) logging.
On Nov 21, 2007 3:58 PM, Jacob Broido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
script(1)
On Nov 21, 2007 3:46 PM, Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a program (I knew it once) that saves to a log file
every command written on a terminal
Hi,
The reason ESX demands scsi disks is because it uses SCSI reservation
commands for locking. It happens in numerous scenarios . i.e When the
vmdk is resized.
You can however do one of the following:
1) Use NFS as storage for vmdk's
2) Use iSCSI as storage for vmdk's.
On 9/8/07, Hetz Ben
Hi,
CPU's: I assume you're refering to VT-x(Intel) and Pacifica(AMD) cpu
extentions. Well, you can find a list of CPU models supporting these
extentions here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/IntelVT and AMD: Athlon
64 F* , All current Opterons
Having said that, using hardware aided vm
I second that one, TRAC!
This suite is just brilliant: wiki,svn,project management, bugtask
management, extendable and pluggable, not bloated..
Go with TRAC and you'll never look back.
On 1/24/07, Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TRAC, only trac.
It integrates
Hi,
The reason you experience slowdown in Vmware 6 (beta) as compared to Vmware
5.x is because as it names suggest - a beta.
VMware 6 has extra debuggingtracing capabilities and features included
into it, and these cannot be disabled in beta release.
Actually the software tells you this when
affected by this - most cpu's
today (desktop,mobile) have frequency scaling.
Note, this issue is not limited to VMware only, AFAIK Microsoft
VirtualPC/Server is also affected by this.
On 1/20/07, Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob Broido wrote:
Are you using Vmware on Intel based laptop
Check out TRAC:
http://trac.edgewall.org/
Will do you good.
kudos to MarGarina for bringing this software to my attention.
On 11/1/06, Eran Tromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can someone recommend some nice, lightweight project management software
for Linux? All such software I found so far
It doesnt support Gantt charts,(they should :) )
On 11/1/06, Eran Tromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacob,
On 2006-11-01 20:40, Jacob Broido wrote:
Check out TRAC:
http://trac.edgewall.org/
Thanks, but does it have Gantt charts?
If it does, they sure fail mention it on the website
Hey,Inorder to answer you, I need some more inputs from you.1) Which product of Vmware are you talking about? Is it ESX ? or Workstation,GSX,Server?2) You've mentioned 1GB-2GB... Do you want to extend existing VM of 1GB to span accross 2GB ?
Is it acceptable for you to perform an offline
1)Shutdown the vm2) vmware-vdiskmanager -x new size file.vmdk3) boot the VM4) Resize the partition filesystems using standard linux tools... (parted,etc...)Voila.
On 10/26/06, Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Ben-Nes wrote: Hello, I need to move Debian from a Vmware with 1GB space
1)Shutdown the vm
2) vmware-vdiskmanager -x new size file.vmdk
3) boot the VM
4) Resize the partition filesystems using standard linux tools...
(parted,etc...)
Voila.
On 10/26/06, Jacob Broido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Inorder to answer you, I need some more inputs from you.
1) Which
that if a new LUN is added to the network, the linux kernel
will NOT notice it. i don't know if it matters to you, but just FYI.--guyOn Thu, 2006-10-12 at 11:46 +0200, Jacob Broido wrote: Hey, as mentioned by Amos, there is a tool called lshal, which works in
2.6.x , not sure about 2.4.x - (Any comments
Hey,
I've been looking for some time for a way to list all scsi,sata,ide devices that are currently 'seen' by the linux host.
The tool should do the following:
1) Find all HBAs in the host.
2)Query each HBA (should be HBA agnostic)
3) Query each device returned by HBA query, and extract the
Some additions...
In kernels 2.6.x with sysfs, a quite simple tool can be written to extract the info mentioned below.
So for 2.6.x I am covered.
The question remains for 2.4.x kernels.
On 10/12/06, Jacob Broido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I've been looking for some time for a way to list
Thanks, was familiar with it.
But still, it doesnt display disk size, which I guess I will extract with blockdev --size dev
On 10/12/06, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/10/06, Jacob Broido
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tool should do the following:
1) Find all HBAs in the host.
2
--size blockdev. blockdev == blockdev returned by lshal.
2.4.x indeed seems like a problem at the moment.
On 10/12/06, Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob Broido [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey, I've been looking for some time for a way to list all scsi,sata,ide devices
Hi,If anything, I suggest you use the Linksys with 32MB ram , for exact version check the following link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRT54GKeep in mind that these router are not x86, so you will have to check asterisk(or any other software you need) compiles/runs properly there.
If you choose to
Hey,I agree that RAID 1 seems to be best solution for current scenario.With Raid 1 you recieve a really good data protection with very little performance impact(more about this below).On the other hand, RAID 5 is quite expensive and will result in performance penalty both on the CPU and IO.
To
Try
www.slashdot.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Meir Kriheli
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:29 AM
To: Amichai Rotman; Linux-IL
Subject: Re: WAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 19:19,
24 matches
Mail list logo
