OK, I understand. Thanks. I'm not going to change the current
configuration right away, but I took this issue into account.
Currently it's technically too complicated and time consuming to run 2
separate BIND servers on the same machine, and I only have one IP
address. But if there will be an
, March 12, 2007 7:37 PM
To: Ariel Biener
Cc: linux-il
Subject: Re: Configuring BIND - DNS server
OK, I understand. Thanks. I'm not going to change the current
configuration right away, but I took this issue into account.
Currently it's technically too complicated and time consuming to run
On Sunday 11 March 2007 12:13, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
Of course I want to learn, but I don't understand what's wrong with
the current configuration. And also, many technical people forget
that hardware costs money. 2 servers would cost me double; 3 servers
would cost me 3 times etc. I'm not
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Ariel Biener wrote:
And of course no one said that you need to buy more hardware, just
run two BIND servers on the same machine, each bound to its own
IP address...
I think that it is impolite to translate like that for geeks. They
always know what is meant and only ask
On 3/8/07, Ariel Biener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The right (well, I am not Paul Vixie but, this is the general consensus) is to
split the DNS setup into the following:
1. Authoritative, a set of name servers that only respond to queries of data
sets that are local to them. Used for you and
On Saturday 10 March 2007 15:50, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I don't see any reason to split. I only have one server machine, and
I'm using the same DNS server for both purposes. It works. Of
course, if you want you can use my DNS server as your own resolver,
but I don't care. By the way,
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 04:52 +0200, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
Hi people,
I'm running a DNS server using BIND ... I want to know how do I configure
BIND to try
F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET first, or is that done automatically?
By the way, maybe using my ISP (Netvision)'s DNS servers is better? I
don't
On 3/8/07, Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are you using a name server for ?
* If you are using a name server to provide DNS services to your own
local network, then you better reference the main root servers.
No.
* If you are using a name server to cache DNS queries for local
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I'm running a DNS server using BIND, and I downloaded the list of the
root servers from [http://www.internic.net/zones/named.root]. I found
out that there is one root server, F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET, which is
located in Tel-Aviv [http://www.root-servers.org/]. Actually, there
On Thursday 08 March 2007 14:27, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
On 3/8/07, Oded Arbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are you using a name server for ?
* If you are using a name server to provide DNS services to your own
local network, then you better reference the main root servers.
No.
* If you
10 matches
Mail list logo
