Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-30 Thread Amos Shapira
Thanks everyone. On 30 Jan 2016 12:43 a.m., "Yuval Adam" wrote: > > > On 01/29/2016 11:52 AM, Amos Shapira wrote: > > > > Does anyone here have experience with public IPv6 in the cloud > > (AWS/DigitalOcean/Google, in decreasing order of preference)? > > > > Yes, I run my

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-29 Thread Yuval Adam
On 01/29/2016 11:52 AM, Amos Shapira wrote: > > Does anyone here have experience with public IPv6 in the cloud > (AWS/DigitalOcean/Google, in decreasing order of preference)? > Yes, I run my personal server on Digital Ocean + native IPv6 and it works great. Unfortunately, IPv6 support on AWS

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-29 Thread Amos Shapira
Does anyone here have experience with public IPv6 in the cloud (AWS/DigitalOcean/Google, in decreasing order of preference)? On 29 Jan 2016 6:19 a.m., "E.S. Rosenberg" wrote: 2016-01-28 20:37 GMT+02:00 Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin < beni.cherniav...@gmail.com>: > Due to

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-29 Thread Geoff Shang
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Amos Shapira wrote: Does anyone here have experience with public IPv6 in the cloud (AWS/DigitalOcean/Google, in decreasing order of preference)? Regarding AWS, the word seems to be that the only way you can make an EC2 instance available via IPv6 is to put a loadbalancer

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
It is of course highly recommended to figure out a way to use the firewall in the router in IPv6 mode too Changing your setup to local fws only makes you both more vulnerable to attack and the total setup much harder to manage In a worst (or best depends on how you look at it) case

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2016-01-28 20:37 GMT+02:00 Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin : > Due to bezeq's modem's wifi unreliability, I'm mostly connecting to my > own wifi router anyway. > I'd have switched to it completely and use a firewall there, except > it's old and doesn't support IPv6 at all, and

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 Thread Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
Due to bezeq's modem's wifi unreliability, I'm mostly connecting to my own wifi router anyway. I'd have switched to it completely and use a firewall there, except it's old and doesn't support IPv6 at all, and I haven't gotten around to buy a new one and/or install *WRT. I'm also a general

More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 Thread Omer Zak
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 15:55 +0200, Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin wrote: > Brain dump & tips on starting with IPv6 [I imagine Shachar knows all > this but for others, including future me ;-]: A nice brain dump! To complement the brain dump, I'd like to see advice, from anyone who has experience with

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-28 Thread Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
2016-01-12 19:18 GMT+02:00 Shachar Shemesh : > > Down sides: > You are still going to be using NAT. Since the IPv6 support in Israel is > virtually non-existent, which means you will be using your IPv4 address quite > a lot. You only get one of those. Do you mean still

Re: IPv6 tunnels [was: Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael]

2016-01-28 Thread Shachar Shemesh
On 26/01/2016 17:04, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:57:01PM +0200, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > >> Hi all. Do we have one or two?? Want to get rid of NAT (partially). > > Off-topic, but I saw the following error today in my mail log: > > dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host

IPv6 tunnels [was: Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael]

2016-01-26 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:57:01PM +0200, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > Hi all. > Do we have one or two?? > Want to get rid of NAT (partially). Off-topic, but I saw the following error today in my mail log: dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host aspmx.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4013:c01::1a] said: 550-5.7.1

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-14 Thread Evgeniy Ginzburg
Thank you for another valuable piece of information. BR, Evgeniy. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:52 PM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > Triple C may also support IPv6, when they started I used them, my > experience with them was very positive. > Very knowledgeable support people

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-13 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
Triple C may also support IPv6, when they started I used them, my experience with them was very positive. Very knowledgeable support people etc. The only reason I'm not with them still is that the other people who use the link demanded Rimon for their filtering prowess. HTH, Eliyahu - אליהו

ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-12 Thread Evgeniy Ginzburg
Hi all. Do we have one or two?? Want to get rid of NAT (partially). BR, Evgeniy. -- So long, and thanks for all the fish. ___ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-12 Thread Yuval Adam
018 Xphone AFAIK they are the only ISP that supports native ipv6 on non-commercial uplinks On 01/12/2016 03:57 PM, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > Hi all. > Do we have one or two?? > Want to get rid of NAT (partially). > > BR, Evgeniy. > > -- > So long, and thanks for all the fish. > > >

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-12 Thread Evgeniy Ginzburg
Thank you. Will try. On Jan 12, 2016 15:59, "Yuval Adam" wrote: > 018 Xphone > AFAIK they are the only ISP that supports native ipv6 on non-commercial > uplinks > > > On 01/12/2016 03:57 PM, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > > Hi all. > > Do we have one or two?? > > Want to get rid of

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-12 Thread Shachar Shemesh
On 12/01/16 18:05, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > > Thank you. Will try. > I did try. On the plus side: They give you a real address. In fact, they give you 2^64 real addresses. Bear in mind, however, that they do not give you a fixed address. You will get a different address range every time you