On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:56 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Intel 3D graphics sucks, both in terms of performance and both in
terms of drivers. I have here i845 chipset and it's 3D has lots of
problems (I did some tests with the X11 OpenGL screensavers, many of
them only show in the upper half of
Hi all.
Is nVidia is still considered to be the best Linux/X11 supported card with 3D
acceleration for under 50$? I need to replace my broken old AGP connected
card.
Thanks,
Chen.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be joining that question. The Intel 3D drivers
(http://intellinuxgraphics.org/) look promising but I couldn't find any
standalone AGP cards with the Intel chipset (only laptops and on-board
graphics).
Chen Levy wrote:
Hi all.
Is nVidia is still considered to be the best Linux/X11
Ok, I'll answer to you both:
Intel 3D graphics sucks, both in terms of performance and both in
terms of drivers. I have here i845 chipset and it's 3D has lots of
problems (I did some tests with the X11 OpenGL screensavers, many of
them only show in the upper half of the screen, no matter how
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:16 +0200, Chen Levy wrote:
Hi all.
Is nVidia is still considered to be the best Linux/X11 supported card with 3D
acceleration for under 50$? I need to replace my broken old AGP connected
card.
Thanks,
Chen.
If you're willing to use closed source, binary
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:56:42PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
NVidia on the other hand has very good and stable 3D under XFree/Xorg,
although the drivers are closed source if you care about this issue.
I have NVidia based cards running on several Linux servers and they
all work fine. Both the
El dom, 12-11-2006 a las 15:17 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson escribió:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:56:42PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
NVidia on the other hand has very good and stable 3D under XFree/Xorg,
although the drivers are closed source if you care about this issue.
I have NVidia
