On Thu, Jun 30, 2005, Omer Zak wrote about MF vs. LAMP - orthogonal to closed
vs. Free (was: Re: Off topic - open vs. closed sources Re: compiling expect
sources or easy to use c++ engine?):
Nowadays, IBM is one of the biggest (if not the biggest) supporters of
Linux developments
Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
but its worth noting that if you will act as you act (espcially at your age) you will be treated as a less
then progessional person. more so, you give other open source
advocates like me bad reputation
Nzer,
I stayed out of the argument up till now, because I really
Nadav Har'El wrote:
Actually, sadly, he almost convinced me. Indeed, imagine a market where you
can sell your software to 100 installation, for a price of $100,000 each
(just making numbers up). That's all great, but how do you get more income
after that? Most companies like to get more money
--0-70147-1120040360=:76647
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear Oron,
While I do appriciate the buisness advice, I prefer to receive buisness advice
from paid consultants who know what I am doing. Giving me a advice without
knowing what i am
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 13:19, Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
While I do appriciate the buisness advice, ...
...we operate in financial segements with banks and mainframes.
As someone who used Rexx on a mainframe circa 1984 (CMS/3 IIRC)
I'll try to ignore your patronizing attitude and boasting about
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005, Oron Peled wrote about Re: Off topic - open vs. closed
sources Re: compiling expect sources or easy to use c++ engine?:
Good. Than the binary/source issue (as a protection measure) is moot.
...
Not like it? On the contrary, you describe an industry that use mostly
custom
On Wednesday, 29 בJune 2005 18:44, Nadav Har'El wrote:
In this situation, if his software was open source - even in the
sense that the source was available to the customer - the customer
could have hired someone to improve the software instead of buying a
new version - and that scares a
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 18:44 +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005, Oron Peled wrote about Re: Off topic - open vs. closed
sources Re: compiling expect sources or easy to use c++ engine?:
Good. Than the binary/source issue (as a protection measure) is moot.
...
Not like
Re: Off topic - open vs. closed
sources Re: compiling expect sources or easy to use c++ engine?:
Good. Than the binary/source issue (as a protection measure) is moot.
...
Not like it? On the contrary, you describe an industry that use mostly
custom made solution (no shrink wrap CompUSA type
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 19:17, Omer Zak wrote:
This looks to me like Oron is not recognizing the full value of his
services.
Bzzzt, Omer you mixed me up withNzer Zaidenberg to whom me (and
Nadav) replied in this thread.
Other than that, what you wrote seem very valid to me.
Bye,
--
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 18:44, Nadav Har'El wrote:
... if customers are allowed to pay only for the features and fixes
they really need. Instead, you want to sell new versions of the
entire software, for a lot of money.
True. FOSS allows customers to pay for what they really need instead
of
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 23:34 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 19:17, Omer Zak wrote:
This looks to me like Oron is not recognizing the full value of his
services.
Bzzzt, Omer you mixed me up with Nzer Zaidenberg to whom me (and
Nadav) replied in this thread.
I stand
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 13:14 -0700, Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
thanks for the support ;-) though it seems like i started a troll.
Now it does feel to me like a troll.
However, I have some left-over food for you trolls, welcome to it.
Yes I mennt that if you give the source you cannot charge when
13 matches
Mail list logo
