On 09/05/2021 20:51, Omer Zak wrote:
After sending the E-mail message reproduced below, I checked the
mailing list archives and did not find there Diego's E-mail.
So he apparently limited his E-mail message's distribution to his
victim and to the mailing list's
After sending the E-mail message reproduced below, I checked the
mailing list archives and did not find there Diego's E-mail.
So he apparently limited his E-mail message's distribution to his
victim and to the mailing list's administrators.
So my memory failed me in this case.
However, I believe
As far as I remember, Diego did send the request to the list. So Ori
Idan could not really ignore Diego's E-mail. Doing so could have been
interpreted as admission of guilt (in the Court of Public Opinion).
I agree that failing to prove a point is different from proving the
opposite point.
I'm not sure my opinion is worth more than anyone else, except I
_am_ one of the admins.
Diego: +1 for not sending your mail to the list. -1 for not CCing
the actual admins, and another one for talking for the community.
Ori: -1 for making this part of the thread
.
>> > There is no verdict in that case, not even a complaint (Checked on
>> > Nevo now). Just a rumor and someone wealthy enough to post it on
>> > Ynet.
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Forwarded message -
>> > From: Ori Idan
>>
t; There is no verdict in that case, not even a complaint (Checked on
> > Nevo now). Just a rumor and someone wealthy enough to post it on
> > Ynet.
> >
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > From: Ori Idan
> > Date: Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:49 PM
ri Idan
> Date: Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Weird 'free' output
> To: Diego Iastrubni
> Cc: IGLU Mailing list
>
>
> Sorry, I am not a convicted criminal.
> If you believe what is written in Yediot, that is your problem.
>
> --
&
, 2021 at 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Weird 'free' output
To: Diego Iastrubni
Cc: IGLU Mailing list
Sorry, I am not a convicted criminal.
If you believe what is written in Yediot, that is your problem.
--
Ori Idan CEO Helicon Books
http://www.heliconbooks.com
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:21 PM Diego
Sorry, I am not a convicted criminal.
If you believe what is written in Yediot, that is your problem.
--
Ori Idan CEO Helicon Books
http://www.heliconbooks.com
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:21 PM Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> Ori,
>
> You are not welcome here. Please unsubscribe.
>
> Admins -
Note that Linux tries to use available memory for cache, that is why free
memory seems small.
--
Ori Idan CEO Helicon Books
http://www.heliconbooks.com
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:48 PM linux.il wrote:
> Omer, thank you!
> Is it related to the "Inactive" count from /proc/meminfo?
> I used to
Omer, thank you!
Is it related to the "Inactive" count from /proc/meminfo?
I used to think that available=free+cache+buffers...
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 1:19 PM Omer Zak wrote:
> From man free:
>
> available
> Estimation of how much memory is available for starting
> new
>From man free:
available
Estimation of how much memory is available for starting
new applications, without swapping. Unlike the data provided by
the cache or free fields, this field takes into account
page cache and also that not all reclaimable memory slabs will
"Available" output seems weird, or I'm missing something?
Any ideas?
TIA, Vitaly
free -m
totalusedfree shared buff/cache
available
Mem: 31654 29883 937 1 832
27675
Swap: 0 0 0
13 matches
Mail list logo
