Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Thu, 08 Sep:
On 9/8/05, Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The short answer:
Just in case someone can answer a quick yes or no:
BSD 4.2's filesystem used to move blocks around as files
grew in order to keep them together, does ext2 (or any
Hi all,
I was wondering why don't I need to defragment my disk,
Everyone says it is not necessary,
Does anyone know the reason ?
10x,
Moshe.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message
Moshe Akirav wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering why don't I need to defragment my disk,
Everyone says it is not necessary,
Does anyone know the reason ?
There is no reason. Fragmentation can and will occur. It's true that due
to file system design (I'm specifically relating to ext3/2 here)
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Moshe Akirav wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering why don't I need to defragment my disk,
Everyone says it is not necessary,
Does anyone know the reason ?
There is no reason. Fragmentation can and will occur. It's true that
due to file system design (I'm specifically
Moshe Akirav wrote:
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Moshe Akirav wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering why don't I need to defragment my disk,
Everyone says it is not necessary,
Does anyone know the reason ?
There is no reason. Fragmentation can and will occur. It's true that
due to file system design
On 9/8/05, Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The short answer:
Just in case someone can answer a quick yes or no:
BSD 4.2's filesystem used to move blocks around as files
grew in order to keep them together, does ext2 (or any
other Linux filesystem, to that matter) also use such
