On 24/03/07, Tzahi Fadida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps there is a way to register a key to the list engine and you can sign
your email with the key. Then, the list engine will be sure to know it is
you. Everyone else and your not signed emails will have to pass the spam
filters.
It's
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007, Dotan Cohen wrote about Re: list police ate my message:
Ah, understood. I did know that it is so easy to forge From addresses.
I just did not think of it.
While it is true that spammers can, and very easily, forge From addresses
and choose one of a legitimate member
On Sunday 25 March 2007 12:08, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 24/03/07, Tzahi Fadida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps there is a way to register a key to the list engine and you can
sign your email with the key. Then, the list engine will be sure to know
it is you. Everyone else and your not signed
Maybe because the spam filter is doing such a good job?;)
But seriously, maybe it's a good idea to remove the spam filter for a while
and see how it affects the list.
Ely
On 3/25/07, Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007, Dotan Cohen wrote about Re: list police ate my
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:55:51PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 23/03/07, Moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday March 22 2007, Peter wrote:
Again the list police ate a message of mine. No, it did not use any
offensive language.
Found and forwarded (Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
On 24/03/07, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to whitelist addresses that have X posts? I'd
imagine any X larger than 10 should suffice.
I like this idea.
(silly test)
--
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il ||
Perhaps there is a way to register a key to the list engine and you can sign
your email with the key. Then, the list engine will be sure to know it is
you. Everyone else and your not signed emails will have to pass the spam
filters.
On Saturday 24 March 2007 22:15, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On
On Thursday March 22 2007, Peter wrote:
Again the list police ate a message of mine. No, it did not use any
offensive language.
Found and forwarded (Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]). It is the bayesian
filter that kicks in and marks it as spam. I am adding a procmail rule
locally to handle the
The copy seems to have been deleted also. The message that was eaten
(twice?) had Headers:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:52:43 +0200 (IST)
thanks,
Peter
On 23/03/07, Moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday March 22 2007, Peter wrote:
Again the list police ate a message of mine. No, it did not use any
offensive language.
Found and forwarded (Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]). It is the bayesian
filter that kicks in and marks it as spam. I
Again the list police ate a message of mine. No, it did not use any
offensive language.
Peter
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe
11 matches
Mail list logo
