Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Sun, 08 Feb:
Personally, I have no objection to putting the matter up for a vote again.
open, anonymous poll on some website? works for me. let's count the
methods to consider, and vote on each. I say multiple choice, because
some people are
Ira Abramov wrote:
Have Ely enforce it by:
* reply-to
* tag the subject
* use the mutt-supported headers
* hack the list server to allow any of the above as a personal setting
for each subscriber (why is it not a built-in feature?!)
* let each reader pick his way.
I'm not sure what those
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Wed, 11 Feb:
I'm not sure what those mutt supported headers are.
In mutt, I mapped r to reply, and L for reply to list.
the L option overrides reply-to, btw, which is cool.
Behavior is set by the muttrc and certain headers
more here:
On Sunday 08 February 2009 17:21:53 Moshe Gorohovsky wrote:
Hi All,
How do I identify linux-il messages?
Use the List-Id: header:
{{{
List-Id: The linux Israeli users list linux-il.cs.huji.ac.il
List-Post: mailto:linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
}}}
Some mail user agents (such as KDE's KMail)
Moshe Gorohovsky wrote:
Hi All,
How do I identify linux-il messages?
That depends on why you want to identify them. If it's because you want
them to go to a different folder, then you will need to disable an
option on the mailing list server. The option is called nodups. If you
disable
Hi,
Herouth Maoz wrote:
That's not a message from linux-il. That's a message to which linux-il
was CCed. The powers in charge of this mailing list encourage people to
use Reply-to-all when answering messages to the list. As a result, you
get a direct message from the person who is writing (if
Herouth Maoz wrote:
I consider it to be very annoying, but I have no say in the matter...
No, that's not true.
The last time the matter was seriously discussed (i.e. - before this
time) the matter was put to a vote, and this (the current settings) came
out as the preferred solution by the
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 05:55:09PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
The last time the matter was seriously discussed (i.e. - before this
time) the matter was put to a vote, and this (the current settings) came
out as the preferred solution by the list members.
How long ago was that? After all
