I am now holding a PCI card by Aztech, with Lucent chips. How am I supposed to
know whether it is a winmodem or not (except the obvious - put it in a
computer)?
I went to the Aztech site, and they don't say anything from which one may
understand it is a winmodem, but what does that mean?
Richard Fiedler wrote:
I heard what all of you were saying about security and installed OpenSSL,
OpenSSH, and the OpenSSH Server.
I see now a sshd listening on port 22.
How do I get this all to work now? Is there no configuration? I wish to
connect with my Macintosh Powerbook G3. How do
Ira Abramov wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Richard Fiedler wrote:
I heard what all of you were saying about security and installed OpenSSL,
OpenSSH, and the OpenSSH Server.
SSL for the webserver?
No. OpenSSH doesn't contain any cryptographic algorythms. Instead, it gets them
from the
You need to compile the program with debug info. I think the option is "-g".
You also probably don't want to use optimizations on debug code.
Shachar
Mike Almogy wrote:
Hi list.
I installed ddd v3.2 and ddd v3.1 and in both of them i can not see the
source code of my
You forgot to mention Thur, the programmers' god (may his machine never run
out of semi infinite tape).
Shachar
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Ira Abramov wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Yossi Cohen wrote:
Hi!
I wanted to know whowhat is the IGLU cabal, and what
Who cares?
OO is a programming design method, which attempts to make the process of
writing software and maintaing it easier than it's predecessor (structured
programming? Procedural programming? whatever). These are goals, and the
principles behind OO, in my humble opinion, are just means to an
Does that include the part where the DHCP license expired in the middle?
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
back to topic: anyone has any written down minutes from the meeting this
friday?
Moshe Bar promised to put his StarOffice presentation on
nslookup:
aristo.savan.com
Server: ns.gtek.co.il
Address: 62.0.59.6
Name:aristo.savan.com
Address: 192.117.120.137
rina.savan.com
Server: ns.gtek.co.il
Address: 62.0.59.6
*** ns.gtek.co.il can't find rina.savan.com: Non-existent domain
192.117.120.137
Server: ns.gtek.co.il
It's so nice to see everyone on topic, relevant, and helpful.
You could have, at least, change the subject.
P.S.
Please note that I have not changed the subject, posted on topic (in fact, I have
created a new topic altogether), and
that I am including the full quote of the original, irrelevant
The widget works like this:
Left mouse click - scroll down
Right mouse click - scroll up
Middle mouse drag - follow mouse up down.
Subba Rao wrote:
My xterm is version 4.0.1b(104). I have the scrollbar showing up on the left side
of my window. I am not able to interactively use the mouse to
At the risk of being sucked into this flame war, I'll put in my two cents.
I do not hold with "davka" people. I don't think eating only non-kosher food
is a healthy thing for your soul. I also happen to think that when a large
group containing also people that cannot eat non-kosher is assembled,
Gavrie Philipson wrote:
If you have a large number of clients to configure, setting up a
transparent proxy is the way to go. This way, nothing has to be
configured on the clients at all. I use such a proxy at our company, and
use it to filter banner ads too BTW.
Docs to configure Squid
"Marc A. Volovic" wrote:
2. Linux has some support for Compaq array controllers. I do not know
their worth.
As Compaq actively pushes Linux based solutions, and they continually
claim that Linux runs flawlessly on all their systems, I believe that
there is pretty good support.
I have seen
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Ah... but this page specifically (item #7) instruct the seekers of
transparent proxies to turn on the *kernel* IPchains firewalling/NAT
code on and use it's transparent proxy option. What this option does is
rewriting packets going through the machine (the
Gavrie Philipson wrote:
Whatever you call it, it's not something specific to Linux. I have no
experience with Checkpoint firewalls (IIRC, that's what Shachar
mentioned), but surely they can redirect a packet from one port to
another one?
Gavrie.
--
Gavrie Philipson
Netmor Applied
Gavrie Philipson wrote:
GWhatever you call it, it's not something specific to Linux. I have no
experience with Checkpoint firewalls (IIRC, that's what Shachar
mentioned), but surely they can redirect a packet from one port to
another one?
Gavrie.
--
Gavrie Philipson
Netmor Applied
While in now way solving the actual problem, installing and configuring xntp
will solve the disturbing symptoms (I hope).
Shachar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The system clock on my Digital Venturis FX running RedHat 6.2 drifts
forward at nearly one day per day. The hardware
Hi Guy and everyone,
guy keren wrote:
maybe you should start thinking then ;) . if a "regular router" = cisco -
then, yes, it can do that, and much more (depending on the version of its
IOS).
Maybe, but not as explained in your email.
this will done done with no address translation on
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
And once again I must say: "Don't think so 3rd layer, JeanLuke".
I am not, number 1.
I was about to explain how to build a 2d level (OSI) bridiging proxy but
someone already did:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/magpie/EtherDivert.html
No extra hop, no need for another
guy keren wrote:
_if_ at all one needs NAT for that... or NAT in _any_ classical sense of
the word (according to your broad definitions, any using of a proxy server
is actually an introduction of NAT, since not the original machine's
addres is being shown in the FROM address of the packet
One addition to Gilad's explanation:
Under the Linmodem site you can find, listed as WinModem, the IBM MWave series of
cards. I happen to know this card (my company used to beta-test this card - before
your time Gilad). This card has all the processing power on card to do all its
tasks (that is
Actually, if you read the GPL, you will find it is perfectly legal for
them to sell this product and not offer anyone the option to download for
free. All the GPL requires them to do is to make the sources available to
anyone who has legally obtained the binaries from them.
Assuming that all the
Your problem is that the linux machine is trying to perform a reverse lookup on the
windows machine, and it takes it about a minute to give up.
If you are connected to the Internet, the DNS is found immediatly, and the machine
gives up immediatly.
In order to solve the proble, either install a
I am not caliming to be all knowledgable in masquarading, but from what I
understand, what you are asking is impossible.
The problem lies in the fact that bandwidth shaping has everything to do
with source and destination IP's. With your case, however, the returing
traffic doesn't know the
It seems like relay.huji.ac.il is the primary DNS for 114.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA,
meaning it should be the one pointing to the DNS for 206.114.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
Since it obviously doesn't, noone else will.
You need to arrange with whoever is managing relay.huji.ac.il to have it
recognize your
You can use "nc" to create the connection, and redirect input and output
to a named pipe (RTFM mknod). Then instruct Minicom to use the named pipe
for communications.
I am not sure this will work, as Minicom is likely to try and setty the
serial port for various parameters. Worth a try, however.
As far as my understanding of the matter reaches, NFS mounting the remote
directory will simply provide you a pseudo local file with major/minor numbers
corresponding to the LOCAL serial port.
Besides - the man didn't say he could do anything with the remote machine,
just telnet.
Danny - it
Try to find out if your server has a configured and working DNS (nslookup from your
machine, and lookup anything).
If it has, find out whether the machines you are trying to connect FROM has reverse
lookup (nslookup again, this time type in the ip you are connecting from, and see if
you are
Danny Paikov wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Danny - it goes without saying that you either own both machines in question,
or have explicit permission from the owner of the machine to which the modem
is connected to do what you are asking here. I want it made clear that I,
personally
My guess is that the problem has to do with the automatic signature that the
mailing list server adds to any message posted here. That definitly breaks
the message authenticy, and probably the MIME format in some way.
I don't think there is a solution to this problem.
Shachar
Noam
The solution is quite simple: Have the Java client do a (blocking) read (of say, one
byte) on the socket after sending
the header. Have the server sent a single "sync" byte to the client immediately
after opening the log file. And all
works just fine.
Bear in mind that this solution has the
Did you check for polterguise activity? Did you have anyone in your family
who died, and who loved the switch from Daylight saving to standard?
The only problem is, if that is indeed the problem, I don't know any good
excorsists. Anyone?
Shachar
- Original Message
The way I see it, there can be no hardware related problems to cause this
problem (and this problem only). The time is kept totally independant of the
RTC, and it also seems that the RTC has a drift, but does not have this
problem.
Being as it is that I remeber some complaints about clock
Short explanation regarding the use of wildcards in Unix commands:
Unlike what you may or may not know from Dos, the one responsible for the
wildcard expansion is not the command itself - you will not find in grep
instructions regarding what to do with filenames having asterixes. Instead, it
is
Yes, I have this one terrible drawback - I tend to tell people who seek help where
they can get help, instead of actually doing all their work for them (thus
increasing the chances they will require help again).
I hold it as a poll to the community whether specifying exact command lines is
If you give the name of the domain you are talking about, we may be able
to query it and understand what you want to do, and what is the current
situation.
Shachar
hagit wrote:
HelloI just modified my domain name to my html server.My site has the
name of my Mail server but I
guy keren wrote:
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, tizmo wrote:
hi, i am using slack7.1 and i think i got a problem...
why look for a problem when you've got none?
i use 'top' and i see that the Swap is not used..
i see these lines:
Mem: 127884K av, 32156K used, 95728K free, 10556K
Let the flame war begin!
Naor Weissman wrote:
What you are basically saying is - USE DEBIAN !!!
Regards,
Naor Weissman
RnD department
BroadServe Israel
+97254553183
http://www.broadserve.com
-Original Message-
From: Yosi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ?? 03 ???
For some strange reason, everytime I respond to a thread, I get all
further communication on that thread twice.
People, please, don't blindly "reply to all" messages. It stands to
reason that, if someone posted to this mailing list, this someone is
also subscribed to it. It is therefor enough to
ok, so why Tux?
Chen Shapira wrote:
Most of the pages you now quote have the same text, except
http://www.penguinpower.com/PenguinPower/whyapenguin
Which has a more meaningful explanation. According to this
explanation, when
Linus wanted a mascot for Linux (if I remember correctly,
The ADSL Howto contained an error regarding the PAP/CHAP usage. As far as I
recall, it advocated using Chap, while Nezeq needs Pap.
You need to copy some line from the Chap configuration to the Pap
configuration.
Please note that I have never done this myself, so I cannot give out the
full
you forgot: and through a reputable distribution channel.
I think, however, that the original post was not trying to protect against
viruses for Linux, but rather protect, using Linux, from viruses for
WinTel.
Shachar
Moshe Zadka wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Mike Almogy
Hi,
It was posted here, so the best thing I can offer you is to search through
the archives.
There was one error that was corrected a little later on. You need to use
PAP instead of CHAP.
Shachar
- Original Message -
From: "Hetz Ben Hamo" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
You need a mail server that will be willing to address your domain. Either
find one, or get seduced into the following great deal.
The deal is a wonderful thing, offering an "Almost root" access to a Linux
computer colocated at BezeqIntl, in Petah Tikwa. It belongs to a group of
people, of whom
Actually, most people have answered this already. I think the best thing is
to understand what a firewall is, assess your needs, and then decide.
First - a firewall is only a tool to enforce your access control. The better
the firewall, you should have a better resolution at defining what it is
Michael wrote:
Hi All
Can an open source, free programs in one way or another get to the level of
option that FW-1 have ?
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Regarding the commercial products available - I know FW-1, and it has very
high capabilities (it has a finer enforcment capabilities than simply
This brings us back to the other flame war. The one about whether the
mailing list should automatically add the "reply-to:" field to the list.
I feel a bit guilty about this. It all started by me asking why I should
get every mail twice (people hitting "reply-to all"). The result were, on
one
Ahem Ahem
Actually, I did not ask for the "Reply-To:" field. I asked that people doing
the actual reply not reply to both me and the list.
This is a technicality. I was not aware of the very good reasons mentioned
in Gilad's mail, and so I did have a change of heart on that matter.
Nadav -
Actually, I counted myself, Gilad and Aviram against, Nadav and you in
favour.
You can say that 60% of the votes were in favour of removing.
Shachar
Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
Hey,
what do you mean "by popular demand" I saw exatly two postings in favour
and against it !. This
This is a wild guess here.
I am assuming that you are doing transparent proxying using an ipchains rule. If
this is the case, it could be that the ipchains rule does not apply to the machine
itself.
If this is the problem, it may be unsolvable, as you need to distinguish local
attempts to
It is.
Read http://www.halisp.net/halisp/reply-to-harmful.html for complete
details.
Shachar
Genady Osnis wrote:
/is it the header that made messages appier twice on the list ?
If it is then I'm against it.
---
Genady Osnis E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Test the headers of the mails you receive from the list (the second copy you
get from me). See which email they were delivered to.
It may be that you are unsubscribing the wrong email address.
Shachar
"Nimrod S. Carmi" wrote:
Hey everyone,
Sorry to say that in here, but I
As far as I remeber, the recommended NTP setup is to have one machine sync with
several servers on the internet, and have all other machines on the local network
sync with that machine. This does have some redundancy problems (i.e. - little
redundancy), but as NTP learns the drift and adjusts
The gist of your problem is that the registrar resolves your host during
registration. This means that dynamic names won't work.
What you need, then, is some service that would mirror your domain, and
would supply the front end you need.
You can try soa.grantiecanyon.com, if they are still up,
Ok, I'll add my 4 cents.
That's two for the fragmantation mechanism, and two for the all hosts
on the network question. I'm afraid nothing of what I say will actually
answer the original question.
First - fraging:
When a router receives a packet which is too big to transfer to the next
hop,
Can someone verify that the setup does, in fact, support the RFC?
I.e. - use hping or other packet crafting tool to generate a big (say,
4K) TCP packet with the don't fragment flag set, and see (with
tcpdump, or a real sniffer, such as ethereal) whether a fragment
needed ICMP is sent.
If it
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Can someone verify that the setup does, in fact, support the RFC?
I.e. - use hping or other packet crafting tool to generate a big
(say, 4K) TCP packet with the don't fragment flag set, and see
(with tcpdump, or a real sniffer, such as ethereal) whether
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Dani Arbel wrote:
Shachar,
There is no point trying to send a packet larger than your own intrface
MTU, with the dont fragment bit set. It shouldn't leave your machine in
the first place (because the packet must be fragmented).
Dani
Oh, so you spotted this fact
foreign DNS's keep his entry cached more than the said
expire (or is it refresh?) given 60 seconds, and when he updates my
DNS, they don't update off me.
I have seen several cases of such behaviour, and not only with DNS.
It seems that the various caches throughout the internet don't like
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001, Cedar Cox wrote about NMI?:
Mar 15 03:36:06 nanu kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but
trying to continue
Mar 15 03:36:06 nanu kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with
your RAM chips
As you can see, I got this in my syslog quite
Ehud Karni wrote
The 2nd way is using SSH tunneling. It is simpler and safer, but it
has one catch - the user must have an account (not all my mail clients
have UNIX accounts). Forward ports 110 and 25 and it'll work like magic
with any mail client. Nobody can steal your password (use key
That's not my experience.
My experience is that you need to manually add a Linux line to boot.ini
in order to get the extra option (which is, in my opinion) the most
convinient way.
To do that, install LILO on the partition boot record, and seek out a
util called bootparam.
I would like to
Cedar Cox wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eran Levy wrote:
No No. Im sorry. From my experience, knowledge and testings, I have got this:
When I have installed NT loader after installing Linux, Linux showed up in
the menu and I only had to choose it from the menu and press ENTER. Im not
telling
Nadav Har'El wrote:
Which means the jmp_buf type is an array. In C you can't normally assign
arrays like you did (because C thinks you're trying to assign pointers, rather
than the content of the array), so either do
Slight correction. I know I lost a bet over this, and I know many people
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001, Shaul Karl wrote about Re: (main_buf =
*main_buf_p) is not syntacticly like (i = *j) ?:
Thank you for the responses.
You're welcome. I bet you didn't expect so many correct responses. Well,
I take the credit for the first response (my response
Adi Stav wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:13:47AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
Thank you for the responses.
What I have done wrong is already pointed out.
If you are curious what I am trying to do:
1. I wanted to have jmp_buf* passed as a function parameter in order to avoid
a global variable.
Seems like this message is spam.
If you would post the FULL headers, maybe we can get more info.
In any case - spammers are known to do things to confuse who they are,
and who they send things to (and where from).
Shachar
Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
Hi All
from time to time I get
Writing (and reading) mail messages in Hebrew is one example that pops
to mind.
The composer may be another.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It did not take much time for Tzafrir to discover one of the main missing
features. This is due to strong opposition from the people responsible for
UI
Arie Vayner wrote:
Hi Guys,
As the one in charge of the technical ADSL issues in Netvision, I can answer
all the questions below...
We have encountered a problem with our RedBack machine, which was not
fragmenting packets with the DF bit set (as normal routers should do). It
WAS sending the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Writing (and reading) mail messages in Hebrew is one example that pops
to mind.
The composer may be another.
In the composer, you have a means to set the direction: add a 'dir=rtl '
attribute where appropriate. Mozilla does not provide a user
Avishay Aton wrote:
and finally secure remote ?! anyone sucsseded to connect with nat +
FWZ ?
Securemote has some option somewhere always encapsulate UDP packets.
You need to check that on when you connect from a non-routable network
(i.e. - behind a NAT).
Thanks
Avishay
Avishay Aton wrote:
my connection is with mtu=1452 and mtu=1452
no errors and packet drops with my ifconfig -i.
Avishay
Not good enough. You need to actually reduce the MTU on the machines on
the internal LAN, or apply an IP Tables rule that allows MSS rewriting.
I have absolutely zero
Try pinging that IP, and then doing arp -a. Compare the MAC address to
the other machines on your network.
If the arp table doesn't contain your IP, then this looks like a
masquareded source IP. If the arp table does have the IP, but the MAC
address is none of your machines, you can be pretty
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Hi,
When you read the following, bare in mind one thing: I am not a lawyer
and I don't even play one on TV. Having said that, I did investiage this
issue quite a lot for reasons very similar to yours.
I am not a lawyer either. Furthermore - noone in my family is a
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On 2001 November 28 ,Wednesday 11:59, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Again, I am no lawyer, but the official GNU/FSF standpoint as I
understand is that the fact that module links against a GPLed work
(the Linux kernel) means in is considered a derived work of the
Linux kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In a box with 2 CPUs, I am using RedHat kernel 2.4.7.
Qustions:
1) Is it possible to enable/disable, by software means, a specific CPU
(cpu 0 | cpu 1) ?
2) While both CPUs are enabled, can we enforce a program to run ONLY
on a specific CPU ?
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001, Ilya Konstantinov wrote about Re: OpenSourceSchools Journal
Online:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
IANAL, but I think that legally, when you buy some software (e.g.,
Microsoft Bob) you buy the privilige of installing
Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:10:17PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a box with 2 CPUs, I am using RedHat kernel 2.4.7.
1) Is it possible to enable/disable, by software means, a specific CPU
(cpu 0 | cpu 1) ?
2) While both CPUs
vi /etc/fstab
Unless you also want the the fstab format, and what the meaning of each
field is, in which case
man fstab
Shachar
root wrote:
Would you please help me to edit fstab? How I could edit /etc/fstab from the
console?
Thanks for your help
Salih Bicakci
Had the exact same problem with a friends' modem (ESS' modem - ES2898s
chipset - I opened the computer up and looked at the actual chip, as
well as looking up the Windows 2000 PnP ID).
After giving up for two or three times, trying to setserial it directly,
we managed to fing it in the
If you have your own domain, or otherwise, you can join fiasco
(http://www.fiasco.org.il). I have not written the most important page
on that site (the terms of joining), but very broadly, we are a group
who share the price of colocating a server between us. If you have your
own domain, this
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
What about Mozilla? The Besttm browser for Linux (and any
other OS as
well).
And heaviest (even comparing to IE). It has many problems, yet,
I'll also note that I don't think it is inherently heavier than IE. Only
problem is that you cannot unload IE, so you
Unless someone (the word Nadav seems to pop into my head, for no
apparent reason) you are trying to send mail to is running an RBL+
filter, which also filters out dial-up IPs, and bingo - you cannot send
them mail.
No, running your own mail server is not always a good idea. I have a
solution
Refael Ackermann wrote:
At 19:12 15/12/2001, you wrote:
Not as far as I know - I just tried to telnet to the Netvision mail
gw and
tried to send mail using a mail from address of an old netvision
account -
it reject my rcpt to command with a 'not relaying' error message. I'm
connection
Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
now - wouldn't it save me 25 min. of radiating my had with the cell
phone because i don't have phone the pc, and a bruto of 1 hour from my
time waiting on the phone, if they would only try to check my user on
the server FROM THE BEGINNING?
Support monkey has THE SCRIPT
Refael Ackermann wrote:
I'm using mailgw.netvision.net.il, and Eudora as client.
To be more specific about what I've figured as the needed header format:
The header must contain a valid netvision address anywhere (including
the To field).
Theoreticly searching the acount names DB shouldn't
Due to legacy reasons, I need a freshly installed RedHat 7.2 to honor
passwd entries that have crypt passwords (i.e. - their hash is 11
characters long). I had no problems with RedHat 7.1. I cannot tell for
sure whether I did anything different (anyone has any suggestions as for
a simple way
Only appeared once, at a line saying password sufficient
/lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok use_authtok md5 shadow
Tried removing the md5 keyword (oh, I wish I knew where the $(!%)#$
pam docs are), and didn't work.
Also tried removing the line altogether, but that didn't work either.
Do I need
guy keren wrote:
there is also a need to install security updates from time to time - i'm
not talking about zope (requires some previous experience with handling
zope, and right now, looks like only chen has that) or mysql (shlomi
configured it in a manner too peculear for me to follow).
.
Requires subscription (even if it's free, at the moment).
Adi Stav wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 01:26:52PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Difference between RedHat and Debian update systems are not really
technological. At least not the important details. I think redhat's
system is a bit better
In the interest of reducing the amount of rants/flames/tomato
throwing/A-bomb making/fish slapping, I will now officially state that I
have offered my help in maintaining the security of the server. I have
one welcome and four silent agreements (i.e. - people who were
notified but did not say
Personally, I use a mail client that has a wonderful innovative new
feature called threads. This allows me to detect on first or second
emails a thread that is not interesting to me, and skip all further
readins on it.
In this particular case, however, I skipped all technical stuff and went
Shlomi Fish wrote:
Now I think I'll try to put into Mandrake Cooker and see how long it will
take in comparison to Debian...
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Probably less. Debian are well known for their reluctance to add new
code, and their long acceptance cycle. I think it is regarded as a
It's not clear which part of the question is less likely.
If you install each and every new 2.4.x kernel, you will have:
A. It will be extremely unlikely that you will not have any failiures.
B. Your uptime will not go above ~month.
The 2.4.x series is not exactly the peek of stability, so far.
Off the top of my head, and I have not tried this out.
Try using the MS supplied Hebrew tools. I think they are the best way to
go about it. Very shortly, you load a codepage (962, I think), and a
special device driver.
Shachar
evyatar wrote:
I use dosemu-1.0.2 and I want to
Strange indeed. What does doing ifdown eth0 ; ifup eth0 do?
Shachar
Evgeny Popov wrote:
Strange thing - in my 2 rh72 systems changing ip address in
'/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0' followed by '/etc/init.d/network
restart' does not work. Rebooting does, but i am not
Ira Abramov wrote:
personally, my MTU is set at 1452, and also forced to re-fragment in the
iptables:
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu
no idea if it helps, but it doesn't hurt :)
Actually, this does not refragment, but rather changes the MSS
guy keren wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ira Abramov wrote:
3. it _could_ be that even without it, the mere fact that ira uses
're-fragmentation' (which, as i remember, was a requirement for any
masquerading linux machine, back in 2.2 kernels - have that changed)
would have caused any
I have seen different thinkpads react radically different to the idea of
an external PS/2 mouse.
With some, I had to manully disable the built-in thing (for lack of a
better word - mouse). There is sometimes a setting called Disable thing
if extrenal mouse is connected during boot. That's the
I'll add two thoughts of mine.
I use the exact cable Ira mentioned in his email (not same type, same
cable. The secret is out - I am Ira's flat-mate), and have not seen the
network outage described by Ira. I can think of three possible reasons:
1. I wasn't paying attention.
2. There
1 - 100 of 2149 matches
Mail list logo
