On Fri, Jan 11 2008, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > So I looked at the code - it seems you build a full extent of the blocks
> > in the file, filling holes as you go along. I initally did that as well,
> > but that is to slow to be usable in real life.
> >
> > You also don't support sparse files,
please check the one that can be applied to x86.git -mm
YH
[PATCH] x86-64: disable the GART early v2
For K8 system: 4G RAM with memory hole remapping enabled, or more than 4G RAM
installed.
when try to use kexec second kernel, and the first doesn't include
gart_shutdown.
the second kernel
* Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I bisected my startup problem down to:
i fixed this in my tree yesterday but was held up by another problem
from uploading it. The patch below should apply to the tree you have.
Ingo
-->
Subject: x86: fix sched_clock()
From:
* Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not too pretty, but I found this made the "PANIC: early
> exception" messages become much more reliably useful: 1. print the
> vector number, 2. print the %cs value, 3. handle error-code-pushing vs
> non-pushing vectors.
thanks, applied.
Hi Rik
> @@ -1128,64 +1026,65 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
(snip)
> + /*
> + * For sorting active vs inactive pages, we'll use the 'anon'
> + * elements of the local list[] array and sort out the file vs
> + * anon pages below.
> + */
> while
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think you have it fundamentally backwards: the best for
> > > performance is WB + cflush. What would WC offer for performance
> > > that cflush cannot do?
> >
> > Cached requires the cache line to be read first before you can write
> > it.
>
I bisected my startup problem down to:
197e4989b0404996dfe3ab091c1398e4c2813d44 is first bad commit
commit 197e4989b0404996dfe3ab091c1398e4c2813d44
Author: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Jan 9 13:31:06 2008 +0100
x86: mark
* Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > but that's not too smart: why dont they use WB plus cflush
> > > > instead?
> > >
> > > Because they need to access it WC for performance.
> >
> > I think you have it fundamentally backwards: the best for
> > performance is WB + cflush. What
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c | 16 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
through these commits:
commit
Probably true that it's not worth the space. I couldn't figure a way to do
it that doesn't use at least 8 bytes per vector. Of course, the vectors
>= 32 are never interesting, so 256 bytes of dispatch table could cover it.
Anyway, I think it's fine just to have the patch on hand to enable for a
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:19:07 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see a PnP resume _consists_ of setting the resources so I can see the test
> implementation wise, but yes, conceptually it seems this test shouldn't be
> present. So just like the attached then?
>
> Pierre, what
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
> > that I'd like to apply later.
> >
>
> Sorry, no sound.
OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
Could you
Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2008 schrieb Joerg Platte:
> konqueror 987jplatte mem REG8,6 2590525
> 1336104 /var/tmp/kdecache-jplatte/ksycoca
> konqueror 987jplatte 12r REG8,6 2590525
> 1336104 /var/tmp/kdecache-jplatte/ksycoca
> konqueror 987jplatte
From: Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:10:57 -0800
> from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
> (aka "class-E") address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
> draft-fuller-240space-00.txt.
>
>
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not too pretty, but I found this made the "PANIC: early exception"
> messages become much more reliably useful: 1. print the vector number,
> 2. print the %cs value, 3. handle error-code-pushing vs non-pushing vectors.
For what do you need cs? It
This name is just passed to platform_device_alloc which has its parameter
declared const.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/base/platform.c |2 +-
include/linux/platform_device.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi Rik
> +static inline int is_file_lru(enum lru_list l)
> +{
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE != 2 || LRU_ACTIVE_FILE != 3);
> + return (l/2 == 1);
> +}
below patch is a bit cleanup proposal.
i think LRU_FILE is more clarify than "/2".
What do you think it?
Index:
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:22:48 +0200 (IST)
> In the (rare) event of simultaneous mutual wake up requests,
> do send the chip an explicit wake-up ack. This is required
> for Texas Instruments's BRF6350 chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <[EMAIL
On Jan 11, 2008 1:17 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 7:57 PM, Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:22:55 +0800
> > "Bryan Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > At page 4-3 of ADSP-BF54x Blackfin(R) Processor Peripheral Hardware
> >
From: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:41:22 +0800
> 1) In tty.c the BUG_ON at line 115 will never be called, because the the
> before list_del_init in this same function.
> 115 BUG_ON(!list_empty(>list));
> So move the list_del_init to rfcomm_dev_del
>
> 2)
On Jan 10, 2008 7:57 PM, Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:22:55 +0800
> "Bryan Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > At page 4-3 of ADSP-BF54x Blackfin(R) Processor Peripheral Hardware
> > Reference, there is a table which guide us the SDH controller does not
>
It's not too pretty, but I found this made the "PANIC: early exception"
messages become much more reliably useful: 1. print the vector number,
2. print the %cs value, 3. handle error-code-pushing vs non-pushing vectors.
Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2008 schrieb Fengguang Wu:
> Joerg, what's the output of `dumpe2fs /dev/sda7` and `lsof|grep /tmp`?
Fengang, here is the output (kernel 2.6.24-rc7 without your patches):
Filesystem volume name: TMP
Last mounted on:
Filesystem UUID:
Alexander wrote:
Hello!
The problem described at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351451 and
at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=655772 and supposedly fixed by the
patch http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/11/25/445094 is still
there. I have compiled
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:46:05 -0500
Pete Wyckoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there another async I/O mechanism? Userspace builds the CDBs,
> just needs some way to drop them in SCSI ML. BSG is almost perfect
> for this, but doesn't do iovec, leading to lots of memcpy.
syslets?
--
To
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:03:05AM +0100, Joerg Platte wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 schrieb Fengguang Wu:
> > > problem, because the iowait problem disappeared today after the regular
> > > Debian update. I'll try to install the old package versions to make it
> > > show up again. Maybe
On Jan 10, 2008 2:37 AM, Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/10/08, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm already cloning the branches; the problem is not getting conflicts etc.
> > when updating.
>
> Isn't git pull --force what you are looking for?
>
> Ciao,
> --
> Paolo
Jan Marek wrote:
Hello lkml,
I have problem with my computer: I have motherboard with AMD690G chipset
and nVidia VGA card. But I cannot set BIOS, to assign for VGA unique
IRQ. VGA card is sharing IRQ with two ohci_hcd (USB 1.1 controllers).
But when I want use for X proprietary nvidia driver, X
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 02:18 +0200, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
> First of all let me wish a happy new year.
> I come back from the vacations and i compiled the initio driver with
>
> #define DEBUG_INTERRUPT 1
> #define DEBUG_QUEUE 1
> #define DEBUG_STATE 1
> #define INT_DISC1
>
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
With Regards
Poonam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Aggrwal Poonam
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:23 PM
To:
Francois Romieu wrote:
Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[..]
No, we have not diagnosed the cause of the problem, beyond the swiotlb usage.
I'm adding the r8169 maintainer, linux-net and linux-kernel to CC, to pass on
your information, I hope you don't mind.
swiotlb
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
With Regards
Poonam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Aggrwal Poonam
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:23 PM
To:
Hi Rik
> +config NORECLAIM
> + bool "Track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)"
> + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && 64BIT
> + help
> + Supports tracking of non-reclaimable pages off the [in]active lists
> + to avoid excessive reclaim overhead on large memory
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:36:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > + if (valid_stack_ptr(tinfo, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
> > + while (valid_stack_ptr(tinfo, frame,
> > sizeof(*frame))) {
>
> Why?
>
> Why not
Please pull from:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.24.git
Which contains:
Carmelo Amoroso (1):
sh: Fix argument page dcache flushing regression.
Paul Mundt (1):
sh: Force __access_ok() to obey address space limit.
include/asm-sh/cacheflush.h |
A little feature addition to allow checkpatch.pl to check patches piped
into it, in addition to specific file arguments.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index:
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:59:52PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>
>>Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>>But actually checking the default implementation in linkage.h already
>>>implements size: [snip]
>>
>>>Are you sure it doesn't work? Your patch should be not needed. If it's
>>>still
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 21:24 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting the following Oops on boot with kernel 2.6.24-rc7-g88fb61e4.
> >
> > Starting udev: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
> > address 2d6d3a65
> > printing eip: c04e1af1
Hi Rik
> -static inline long mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim_inactive(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> - struct zone *zone, int priority)
> +static inline long mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> + struct zone *zone, int
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:42:40PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> How about throwing out hand-rolled debug printk wrappers for the
> brain-damage they are and using the ones the kernel provides
> instead?
Sounds great!
//Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:09:45AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:03:58PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> > -#define DEBUG(x,args...) printk(__FUNCTION__ ": " x,##args)
> > +#define DEBUG(x, args...) printk("%s: ", __func__, x, ##args)
>
> Can this really be expected to work
Change drivers/pci/proc.c to use the unlocked_ioctl handler instead of
the ioctl one.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
proc.c | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/proc.c b/drivers/pci/proc.c
index 716439e..8ac5880 100644
---
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/via_drv.c b/drivers/char/drm/via_drv.c
index 2d4957a..a8041c5 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/via_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/via_drv.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/savage_drv.c b/drivers/char/drm/savage_drv.c
index eee52aa..021de44 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/savage_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/savage_drv.c
@@ -50,7
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/sis_drv.c b/drivers/char/drm/sis_drv.c
index 7dacc64..1bbde29 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/sis_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/sis_drv.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/tdfx_drv.c b/drivers/char/drm/tdfx_drv.c
index 012ff2e..ec5a43e 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/tdfx_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/tdfx_drv.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/radeon_drv.c b/drivers/char/drm/radeon_drv.c
index 349ac3d..6d7588c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/radeon_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/radeon_drv.c
@@ -85,7
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/mga_drv.c b/drivers/char/drm/mga_drv.c
index 5572939..be31707 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/mga_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/mga_drv.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/r128_drv.c b/drivers/char/drm/r128_drv.c
index 6108e75..b2a16a7 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/r128_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/r128_drv.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/i830_dma.c b/drivers/char/drm/i830_dma.c
index 69a363e..2f82480 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/i830_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/i830_dma.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/i915_drv.c b/drivers/char/drm/i915_drv.c
index 85bcc27..70a882e 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/i915_drv.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
Register drm_ioctl as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/i810_dma.c b/drivers/char/drm/i810_dma.c
index eb381a7..e3adbf3 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/i810_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/i810_dma.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7
Just a couple of quick questions if anyone can shed light regarding
functions exported for modules relating to splice():
* Is there a particular reason why the useful helper __splice_from_pipe
is exported, but not the locking equivalent splice_from_pipe or its
equally useful helper
The ioctl handlers are called with the BKL held, where as unlocked_ioctl
handlers are not. The drm_ioctl function is registered as an ioctl
handler. But it does not need the BKL to be held. Changing drm_ioctl to
register as an unlocked_ioctl function.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <[EMAIL
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:03:58PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> -#define DEBUG(x,args...) printk(__FUNCTION__ ": " x,##args)
> +#define DEBUG(x, args...)printk("%s: ", __func__, x, ##args)
Can this really be expected to work when x contains conversions?
How about:
#define DEBUG(x,
On Jan 8, 2008 2:36 PM, Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2008 12:15 AM, Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 7, 2008 9:50 PM, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > > try to kexec 2.6.23 from RHEL 5.1,
this one is against to linus tree.
in case some one need to use kexec to new kernel from old kernel with
gart_shutdown.
YH
[PATCH] x86-64: disable the GART early
For K8 system: 4G RAM with memory hole remapping enabled, or more than 4G RAM
installed.
when try to use kexec second kernel, and
On 11-01-08 02:36, Zachary Amsden wrote:
FWIW, I fixed the problem locally by recompiling, changing port 80 to
port 84 in io.h; works great, and doesn't conflict with any occupied
ports.
Might not give you a "proper" delay though. 0xed should be a better choice...
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:44 +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote:
> David Dillow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At the moment, I'm not sure how to track this farther, or how to fix it
> > properly. Any advice would be appreciated.
>
> Just out of curiosity, could you try the appended cumulative
I'm no expert, but I happened to notice this go by.
> The first thing I notice about the path is that ioport_32.c and the unified
> ioport.c use __clear_bit,
> while ioport_64.c uses clear_bit.
That doesn't seem too critical.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned long
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:59:52PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > But actually checking the default implementation in linkage.h already
> > implements size: [snip]
>
> > Are you sure it doesn't work? Your patch should be not needed. If it's
> > still wrong then just ENDPROCs()
On Jan 11, 2008 2:39 AM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:48:43PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > The patches are done on my side, please help to check.
>
> Along with all of the other comments from people, I have a few.
>
> > This is the first one of the series about
On Jan 10, 2008 11:41 PM, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > The patches are done on my side, please help to check.
> >
> > This is the first one of the series about driver core changes.
> > If this one is accepted and there's no other
On Jan 10, 2008 9:23 PM, Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:48:43 +0800,
> Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please add a kerneldoc comment for each of the new interfaces.
Will do.
>
> > +int class_for_each_device(struct class *class, void *data,
> > +
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:13:51 -0800
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Winchester wrote:
> > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Kevin Winchester wrote:
> >>> My first time building and booting the mm branch of x86.git was pretty
> >>> successful. The only error I noticed was the
Trond Myklebust wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the following Oops on boot with kernel 2.6.24-rc7-g88fb61e4.
Starting udev: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
2d6d3a65
printing eip: c04e1af1 *pde =
Oops: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: evdev evbug
2008/1/11, Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The version doesn't work on a .24-rc kernel. Can you compile it
> with .23?
>
Thank you for your help, I built it.
Thanks,
Joonwoo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
Here's the hopefully-final version of the patch, which I have just
tested on Intel and AMD.
In my AMD test, I happened to discover that although MCEs were being
logged, the MCE counter at
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu(whatever)/thermal_throttle/count was not
being updated. I fixed this by
On Jan 10, 2008 8:34 PM, Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Young wrote:
> > This is the first one of the series about driver core changes.
>
> Please always provide kerneldoc comments when you add new API elements;
> here: exported functions.
>
> It's unfortunate that the driver
>> - if yes, does booting with "nmi_watchdog=2 idle=poll" give you a
>> working NMI watchdog? (working NMI watchdog means the NMI counts
>> increase for all cores in /proc/interrupts).
> booting with the above gives me an incrementing NMI counter in
> /proc/interrupts
Ingo,
Is there
Hi,
I'm getting the following Oops on boot with kernel 2.6.24-rc7-g88fb61e4.
Starting udev: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
2d6d3a65
printing eip: c04e1af1 *pde =
Oops: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: evdev evbug rtc_cmos pcspkr floppy rtc_core
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:13:51 -0800
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Winchester wrote:
> > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Kevin Winchester wrote:
> >>> My first time building and booting the mm branch of x86.git was pretty
> >>> successful. The only error I noticed was the
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:38 +0900, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> I should have checked code base, it's my fault.
> it's seems very similar, but I could not made build unfortunately.
> Can you introduce to me how to build it please?
>
> my build error is here:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/SRC/DRIVERS/iwlwifi $
2008/1/11, Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Joonwoo,
>
> We already did something similiar in our code base. Could you please
> take a look at this patch?
>
> http://intellinuxwireless.org/repos/?p=iwlwifi.git;a=commitdiff;h=57aa02255e9d7be5e2494683fc2793bd1d0707e2
>
> Thanks,
> -yi
Ooops :-)
I
On Thursday January 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is the seventh patchset to fix the use-after-free problem in lockd
This patch set looks good now. I'm happy to give it a
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Two remaining issues that I would like to see address, but don't
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 17:22 -0500, David P. Reed wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >
> > According to Phoenix Technologies book "System BIOS for IBM PCs,
> > Compatibles and EISA Computers, 2nd Edition", the I/O port list gives
> >
> > port 0080h R/W Extra page register (temporary storage)
> >
>
Andrea Righi wrote:
Allow to limit the bandwidth of I/O-intensive processes, like backup
tools running in background, large files copy, checksums on huge files,
etc.
This kind of processes can noticeably impact the system responsiveness
for some time and playing with tasks' priority is not
Hello Reinette,
2008/1/11, Chatre, Reinette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Could synchronize_irq() be moved into iwl_disable_interrupts() ? I am
At this time, iwl_disable_interrupts() can be called with irq
disabled, so for do that I think additional modification would be
needed.
> also wondering if
On 10-01-08 08:58, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Rene Herman wrote:
On 09-01-08 23:43, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Jaroslav -- in your role as ISA-PnP maintainer and Bjorn, in yours as
having been foollish enough to touch PnP recently:
as hibernation (swsusp) started to work with my
From: "Chris Friesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:24:19 -0600
> I've got an issue that's popped up with a deployed system running
> 2.6.10.
...
> So...anyone have any ideas/suggestions?
You have to be kidding, coming here for help with a nearly
4 year old kernel.
The
Hi,
The patch below is intended as a replacement for
gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch that deadlocked
suspend and hibernation on some systems. The present patch contains some
safeguards against deadlocks in the relevant cases and a mechanism to print
warnings if a
Kevin Winchester wrote:
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Kevin Winchester wrote:
My first time building and booting the mm branch of x86.git was pretty
successful. The only error I noticed was the following in my dmesg:
hwclock[622] general protection ip:804b226 sp:bff43e30 error:0
I'm not sure
Hi Joonwoo,
We already did something similiar in our code base. Could you please
take a look at this patch?
http://intellinuxwireless.org/repos/?p=iwlwifi.git;a=commitdiff;h=57aa02255e9d7be5e2494683fc2793bd1d0707e2
Thanks,
-yi
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:02 +0900, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> Eleminiate
Jens Axboe wrote:
Hi,
loop.c currently uses the page cache interface to do IO to file backed
devices. This works reasonably well for simple things, like mapping an
iso9660 file for direct mount and other read-only workloads. Writing is
somewhat problematic, as anyone who has really used this
Andi Kleen wrote:
> But actually checking the default implementation in linkage.h already
> implements size: [snip]
> Are you sure it doesn't work? Your patch should be not needed. If it's
> still wrong then just ENDPROCs() need to be added.
The ENDPROCs() were not used everywhere. Some code
From: Anton Salikhmetov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The patch contains changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory
mapped files:
1) adding a new flag triggering update of the inode data;
2) implementing a helper function for checking that flag and updating ctime and
mtime;
3) updating
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:41:58 +0800
"peerchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH]quirks: set 'En' bit of MSI Mapping for devices on HT-based
> nvidia platform
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Currid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Peer Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You didn't provide a reason
From: Anton Salikhmetov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The patch contains changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory
mapped files:
1) adding a new flag triggering update of the inode data;
2) implementing a helper function for checking that flag and updating ctime and
mtime;
3) updating
From: Anton Salikhmetov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I would like to propose my second solution for the bug #2645 from the
kernel bug tracker:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
You may find the relevant background information as well as an extensive
discussion of my previous solution using
From: Anton Salikhmetov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The patch contains substantial code cleanup of the sys_msync() function:
1) consolidated error check for function parameters;
2) using the PAGE_ALIGN() macro instead of "manual" alignment;
3) improved readability of the loop traversing the process
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:55:13 +0100
Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the previous empty email...
>
> Supriya noted in his testing that sometimes buffers removed by
> __remove_assoc_queue() don't have b_assoc_mapping set (and thus IO error
> won't be properly
Allow to limit the bandwidth of I/O-intensive processes, like backup
tools running in background, large files copy, checksums on huge files,
etc.
This kind of processes can noticeably impact the system responsiveness
for some time and playing with tasks' priority is not always an
acceptable
On Jan 9, 2008 6:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you apply the patch below + the debug patch which prints the timer
> stats on softlockup and provide the output of this.
Applied to today's git and running for 21 hours - no recurrence yet
even with 1.2 wakeups per second.
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Index: linux-compile-i386.git/Makefile
> ===
> --- linux-compile-i386.git.orig/Makefile 2008-01-09 14:09:36.0
> -0500
> +++ linux-compile-i386.git/Makefile 2008-01-09 14:10:07.0 -0500
>
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 00:40 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 12:08 AM, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The git logs also show that arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c hasn't been
> > modified since it was pull in on Oct. 11 ..
>
> Daniel,
> are we looking at the same
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:21:50AM +0100, Torben Viets wrote:
>
> Why I can't see both in /proc/crypto and of course not use in int
> cryptsetup, till I make a /etc/init.d/udev restart ist ths a kernel bug,
> or a ubuntu bug?
The algorithm xts(aes) is an instantiation of the xts template. As
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Kevin Winchester wrote:
>> My first time building and booting the mm branch of x86.git was pretty
>> successful. The only error I noticed was the following in my dmesg:
>>
>> hwclock[622] general protection ip:804b226 sp:bff43e30 error:0
>>
>> I'm not sure exactly how to
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 00:40 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 12:08 AM, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The git logs also show that arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c hasn't been
> > modified since it was pull in on Oct. 11 ..
>
> Daniel,
> are we looking at the same
On Thursday 10 January 2008 09:01, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Jan Marek wrote:
>
> > Hello lkml,
> >
> > I have problem with my computer: I have motherboard with AMD690G chipset
> > and nVidia VGA card. But I cannot set BIOS, to assign for VGA unique
> > IRQ. VGA
On Jan 11, 2008 12:08 AM, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The git logs also show that arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c hasn't been
> modified since it was pull in on Oct. 11 ..
Daniel,
are we looking at the same tree?
fpu_trig.c has been modified (and cleaned up) by Ingo 35 hours ago:
1 - 100 of 1050 matches
Mail list logo
