Sometimes, the users may require a quirk to be provided from ACPI subsystem
core to prevent a GPE from flooding. Normally, if a GPE cannot be
dispatched, ACPICA core automatically prevents the GPE from firing. But
there are cases the GPE is dispatched by _Lxx/_Exx provided via AML table,
and OSPM
Sometimes, the users may require a quirk to be provided from ACPI subsystem
core to prevent a GPE from flooding. Normally, if a GPE cannot be
dispatched, ACPICA core automatically prevents the GPE from firing. But
there are cases the GPE is dispatched by _Lxx/_Exx provided via AML table,
and OSPM
"Serge E. Hallyn" writes:
> Root in a user ns cannot be trusted to write a traditional
> security.capability xattr. If it were allowed to do so, then any
> unprivileged user on the host could map his own uid to root in a
> namespace, write the xattr, and execute the file with
"Serge E. Hallyn" writes:
> Root in a user ns cannot be trusted to write a traditional
> security.capability xattr. If it were allowed to do so, then any
> unprivileged user on the host could map his own uid to root in a
> namespace, write the xattr, and execute the file with privilege on the
>
When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
stub. In such case, vma is unused and a compiler raises a warning:
arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c: In function ‘mark_screen_rdonly’:
arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c:180:26: warning: unused variable ‘vma’
[-Wunused-variable]
struct
When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
stub. In such case, vma is unused and a compiler raises a warning:
arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c: In function ‘mark_screen_rdonly’:
arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c:180:26: warning: unused variable ‘vma’
[-Wunused-variable]
struct
Hi all,
Changes since 20161207:
The powerpc allyesconfig build seems to be fixed again.
The sunxi tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The tip tree lost its perf build failure.
The pinctrl tree lost its build failure.
I dropped 2 patches from the akpm tree that no longer apply
Hi all,
Changes since 20161207:
The powerpc allyesconfig build seems to be fixed again.
The sunxi tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The tip tree lost its perf build failure.
The pinctrl tree lost its build failure.
I dropped 2 patches from the akpm tree that no longer apply
This patch introduces virtio-crypto driver for Linux Kernel.
The virtio crypto device is a virtual cryptography device
as well as a kind of virtual hardware accelerator for
virtual machines. The encryption anddecryption requests
are placed in the data queue and are ultimately handled by
This patch introduces virtio-crypto driver for Linux Kernel.
The virtio crypto device is a virtual cryptography device
as well as a kind of virtual hardware accelerator for
virtual machines. The encryption anddecryption requests
are placed in the data queue and are ultimately handled by
>> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h:44:44:
error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_data'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).proc_id)
^
Let's include cpudata.h in topology_64.h.
>> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h:44:44:
error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_data'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).proc_id)
^
Let's include cpudata.h in topology_64.h.
Hi Luis,
[auto build test WARNING on wsa/i2c/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20161207]
[cannot apply to v4.9-rc8]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Luis-Oliveira/i2c
Hi Luis,
[auto build test WARNING on wsa/i2c/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20161207]
[cannot apply to v4.9-rc8]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Luis-Oliveira/i2c
v6:
- add patch 1/2 to make sparc architecture happy. [Sam]
- close created sessions previousely when rekeying.
- convert the priority of virtio crypto algs from 4001 to 501
which is enough.
v5:
- add comments for algs_lock and table_lock. [Stefan]
- use kzfree instead of kfree for key
v6:
- add patch 1/2 to make sparc architecture happy. [Sam]
- close created sessions previousely when rekeying.
- convert the priority of virtio crypto algs from 4001 to 501
which is enough.
v5:
- add comments for algs_lock and table_lock. [Stefan]
- use kzfree instead of kfree for key
Ian Kent writes:
> On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 10:30 +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ian Kent writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 05:13 +, Al Viro wrote:
>> > > FWIW, I've folded that pile into vfs.git#work.autofs.
>> > >
>> > > Problems:
>> >
>> >
Ian Kent writes:
> On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 10:30 +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ian Kent writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 05:13 +, Al Viro wrote:
>> > > FWIW, I've folded that pile into vfs.git#work.autofs.
>> > >
>> > > Problems:
>> >
>> > snip ...
>> >
>> > > * the last one
Hi all,
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:30:57 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 12/07/16 15:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:42:32 -0800 Randy Dunlap
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I started seeing this yesterday (2016-1206).
> >> This is on
Hi all,
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:30:57 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 12/07/16 15:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:42:32 -0800 Randy Dunlap
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I started seeing this yesterday (2016-1206).
> >> This is on x86_64.
> >>
> >> Anybody know about it?
> >>
First, make the asm-prototypes.h presence optional. The next patch will
make it unneeded for modversion support.
Use the -D__GENKSYMS__ like we do for .c files but to expand the
EXPORT_SYMBOL macro using the preprocessor instead of a sed script.
The preprocessor output parsing is then limited to
First, make the asm-prototypes.h presence optional. The next patch will
make it unneeded for modversion support.
Use the -D__GENKSYMS__ like we do for .c files but to expand the
EXPORT_SYMBOL macro using the preprocessor instead of a sed script.
The preprocessor output parsing is then limited to
Rather than having an asm-prototypes.h file where C prototypes for exported
asm symbols are centralized, let's have some macros that can be used
directly in the code where those symbols are exported for genksyms
consumption. Either the prototype is provided directly if no include
files has it, or
Rather than having an asm-prototypes.h file where C prototypes for exported
asm symbols are centralized, let's have some macros that can be used
directly in the code where those symbols are exported for genksyms
consumption. Either the prototype is provided directly if no include
files has it, or
This is a partial repost of the patches I sent last week, without the
ARM part this time, in the hope that this can be considered for the next
merge window so that architecture specific changes can start using it
afterwards.
include/asm-generic/export.h | 24
This is a partial repost of the patches I sent last week, without the
ARM part this time, in the hope that this can be considered for the next
merge window so that architecture specific changes can start using it
afterwards.
include/asm-generic/export.h | 24
Issue caught with static analysis tool:
"Dangerous usage of 'name' (strncpy doesn't always 0-terminate it)"
Use strlcpy _includes_ the NUL terminator, and strlcat() which ensures
that it won't overflow the buffer.
Reported-by: Maninder Singh
Signed-off-by: Vaneet
Issue caught with static analysis tool:
"Dangerous usage of 'name' (strncpy doesn't always 0-terminate it)"
Use strlcpy _includes_ the NUL terminator, and strlcat() which ensures
that it won't overflow the buffer.
Reported-by: Maninder Singh
Signed-off-by: Vaneet Narang
CC: Russell King
---
On 12/07/2016 05:59 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Le 07/12/2016 à 17:32, Marek Vasut a écrit :
>> On 12/07/2016 05:29 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>>> Le 07/12/2016 à 17:20, Marek Vasut a écrit :
On 12/06/2016 05:52 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> This patch provides an alternative mean to
On 12/07/2016 05:59 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Le 07/12/2016 à 17:32, Marek Vasut a écrit :
>> On 12/07/2016 05:29 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>>> Le 07/12/2016 à 17:20, Marek Vasut a écrit :
On 12/06/2016 05:52 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> This patch provides an alternative mean to
Dear Shuah,
> I noticed that in many places sysfs_attr_init() is called before populating
> the fields such as name etc. However, I don't think the order matters.
>
> sysfs_attr_init() doesn't depend on name or any other fields being set:
>
> #define sysfs_attr_init(attr)
Dear Shuah,
> I noticed that in many places sysfs_attr_init() is called before populating
> the fields such as name etc. However, I don't think the order matters.
>
> sysfs_attr_init() doesn't depend on name or any other fields being set:
>
> #define sysfs_attr_init(attr)
Hi Andrew,
While rebasing the post -next part of your tree today, I dropped these
patches:
drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier.h: fix build with old gcc
drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-mio.c: fix build for older gcc
Some commits in other trees that modified these files have been dropped
and
Hi Andrew,
While rebasing the post -next part of your tree today, I dropped these
patches:
drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier.h: fix build with old gcc
drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-mio.c: fix build for older gcc
Some commits in other trees that modified these files have been dropped
and
On 07-12-16, 22:23, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> I think that the dev_pm_opp_put(opp) should be called after if statement
> If dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil() return error, I think the calling of
> dev_pm_opp_put(opp) is not necessary.
During development I had following check in dev_pm_opp_put():
On 07-12-16, 22:23, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> I think that the dev_pm_opp_put(opp) should be called after if statement
> If dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil() return error, I think the calling of
> dev_pm_opp_put(opp) is not necessary.
During development I had following check in dev_pm_opp_put():
Also add nodes and properties for thermal management support.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao
---
Depend on patch "[v3] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS1012A SoC".
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9462399/
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi | 76
Also add nodes and properties for thermal management support.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao
---
Depend on patch "[v3] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS1012A SoC".
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9462399/
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi | 76 ++
1 file
On 12/07/2016 06:23 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> A struct ida ends up costing > 16 KB of runtime memory, which is quite
> a lot for something which on my laptop as of this writing has handed
> out 27 ids in its lifetime. So use the simpler and lighter-weight
> struct tida.
I'm worried that your
On 12/07/2016 06:23 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> A struct ida ends up costing > 16 KB of runtime memory, which is quite
> a lot for something which on my laptop as of this writing has handed
> out 27 ids in its lifetime. So use the simpler and lighter-weight
> struct tida.
I'm worried that your
Jia He writes:
> Fixes: a4b349540a ("powerpc/mm: Cleanup LPCR defines")
> Signed-off-by: Jia He
I sent another one
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161208034213.21700-1-aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
to fix the same issue. I didn't notice this on the list.
Jia He writes:
> Fixes: a4b349540a ("powerpc/mm: Cleanup LPCR defines")
> Signed-off-by: Jia He
I sent another one
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161208034213.21700-1-aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
to fix the same issue. I didn't notice this on the list.
> ---
>
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 10:30 +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 05:13 +, Al Viro wrote:
> > > FWIW, I've folded that pile into vfs.git#work.autofs.
> > >
> > > Problems:
> >
> > snip ...
> >
> > > * the last one
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 10:30 +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 05:13 +, Al Viro wrote:
> > > FWIW, I've folded that pile into vfs.git#work.autofs.
> > >
> > > Problems:
> >
> > snip ...
> >
> > > * the last one (propagation-related) is too
Fixes: a4b349540a ("powerpc/mm: Cleanup LPCR defines")
Signed-off-by: Jia He
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 9e1499f..93ec25e 100644
Fixes: a4b349540a ("powerpc/mm: Cleanup LPCR defines")
Signed-off-by: Jia He
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 9e1499f..93ec25e 100644
---
zhongjiang writes:
> From: zhong jiang
>
> A soft lookup will occur when I run trinity in syscall kexec_load.
> the corresponding stack information is as follows.
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman"
>
> [ 237.235937] BUG: soft
zhongjiang writes:
> From: zhong jiang
>
> A soft lookup will occur when I run trinity in syscall kexec_load.
> the corresponding stack information is as follows.
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman"
>
> [ 237.235937] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 22s! [trinity-c6:13859]
> [ 237.242699]
Hi Timur,
On 8 December 2016 at 01:25, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote:
>>
>> a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to here, I have fix the
>> problem in my repo, it would happen in next patchset
>>
>>
Hi Timur,
On 8 December 2016 at 01:25, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote:
>>
>> a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to here, I have fix the
>> problem in my repo, it would happen in next patchset
>>
>>
On 12/7/2016 4:44 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros writes:
Roger Quadros writes:
> DCFG.DEVSPD == 0x3 is not valid and we need to set
> DCFG.DEVSPD to 0x1 for full speed mode.
seems like it has been made invalid somewhere
On 12/7/2016 4:44 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros writes:
Roger Quadros writes:
> DCFG.DEVSPD == 0x3 is not valid and we need to set
> DCFG.DEVSPD to 0x1 for full speed mode.
seems like it has been made invalid somewhere between 1.73a and
2.60a.
f2fs_sync_file() remount_ro
- f2fs_readonly
- destroy_flush_cmd_control
- f2fs_issue_flush
- no fcc pointer!
So, this patch doesn't free fcc in this case, but just stop its kernel thread
which sends flush commands.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
f2fs_sync_file() remount_ro
- f2fs_readonly
- destroy_flush_cmd_control
- f2fs_issue_flush
- no fcc pointer!
So, this patch doesn't free fcc in this case, but just stop its kernel thread
which sends flush commands.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
Le 12/02/16 à 01:42, Valentin Rothberg a écrit :
> Correct the bcm47xx watchdog option. The convention of bcm watchdogs is
> the _WDT suffix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg
Also applied; thanks!
--
Florian
Le 12/02/16 à 01:42, Valentin Rothberg a écrit :
> Correct the bcm47xx watchdog option. The convention of bcm watchdogs is
> the _WDT suffix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg
Also applied; thanks!
--
Florian
Le 12/02/16 à 01:24, Valentin Rothberg a écrit :
> s/CONFIG_CONFIG_BCM47XX_NVRAM/CONFIG_BCM47XX_NVRAM/
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg
Applied thanks!
--
Florian
Le 12/02/16 à 01:24, Valentin Rothberg a écrit :
> s/CONFIG_CONFIG_BCM47XX_NVRAM/CONFIG_BCM47XX_NVRAM/
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg
Applied thanks!
--
Florian
Hi Nobuo.iwata,
I noticed that in many places sysfs_attr_init() is called
before populating the fields such as name etc. However, I
don't think the order matters.
sysfs_attr_init() doesn't depend on name or any other fields
being set:
#define sysfs_attr_init(attr) \
do
Hi Nobuo.iwata,
I noticed that in many places sysfs_attr_init() is called
before populating the fields such as name etc. However, I
don't think the order matters.
sysfs_attr_init() doesn't depend on name or any other fields
being set:
#define sysfs_attr_init(attr) \
do
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> devm_memremap_pages() records mapped ranges in pgmap_radix with a entry
> per section's worth of memory (128MB). The key for each of those entries is
> a section number.
>
> This leads to false positives when
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> devm_memremap_pages() records mapped ranges in pgmap_radix with a entry
> per section's worth of memory (128MB). The key for each of those entries is
> a section number.
>
> This leads to false positives when devm_memremap_pages() is passed a
From: zhong jiang
A soft lookup will occur when I run trinity in syscall kexec_load.
the corresponding stack information is as follows.
[ 237.235937] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 22s! [trinity-c6:13859]
[ 237.242699] Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung
From: zhong jiang
A soft lookup will occur when I run trinity in syscall kexec_load.
the corresponding stack information is as follows.
[ 237.235937] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 22s! [trinity-c6:13859]
[ 237.242699] Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
[ 237.248573] CPU:
On 12/08/2016 02:26 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2016-12-07 16:59, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> On 2016-12-07 16:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 12/08/2016 01:27 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
The DRM subsystem specifies the pixel clock polarity from a
controllers perspective:
On 12/08/2016 02:26 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2016-12-07 16:59, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> On 2016-12-07 16:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 12/08/2016 01:27 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
The DRM subsystem specifies the pixel clock polarity from a
controllers perspective:
On 12/07/16 15:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:42:32 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> I started seeing this yesterday (2016-1206).
>> This is on x86_64.
>>
>> Anybody know about it?
>>
>> kallsyms failure: relative symbol value
On 12/07/16 15:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:42:32 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> I started seeing this yesterday (2016-1206).
>> This is on x86_64.
>>
>> Anybody know about it?
>>
>> kallsyms failure: relative symbol value 0x8100 out of range in
By now, linux is mostly endian-clean. Enabling endian-ness
checks for everyone produces about 200 new sparse warnings for me -
less than 10% over the 2000 sparse warnings already there.
Not a big deal, OTOH enabling this helps people notice
they are introducing new bugs.
So let's just drop
By now, linux is mostly endian-clean. Enabling endian-ness
checks for everyone produces about 200 new sparse warnings for me -
less than 10% over the 2000 sparse warnings already there.
Not a big deal, OTOH enabling this helps people notice
they are introducing new bugs.
So let's just drop
Dear Shuah,
I'm afraid there's one thing I have concerned.
I think it's better to move sysfs_attr_init() before
status->attr.attr.name = status->name;
Best Regards,
nobuo.iwata
//
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-usb-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-usb-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Dear Shuah,
I'm afraid there's one thing I have concerned.
I think it's better to move sysfs_attr_init() before
status->attr.attr.name = status->name;
Best Regards,
nobuo.iwata
//
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-usb-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-usb-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
2016. 12. 8. 02:18 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I use Patchwork for handling incoming patches. Put its address here so
> submitters could know what is in the queue.
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
2016. 12. 8. 02:18 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I use Patchwork for handling incoming patches. Put its address here so
> submitters could know what is in the queue.
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS
On 2016/12/8 9:50, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> zhongjiang writes:
>
>> From: zhong jiang
>>
>> A soft lookup will occur when I run trinity in syscall kexec_load.
>> the corresponding stack information is as follows.
> Overall that looks reasonable.
On 2016/12/8 9:50, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> zhongjiang writes:
>
>> From: zhong jiang
>>
>> A soft lookup will occur when I run trinity in syscall kexec_load.
>> the corresponding stack information is as follows.
> Overall that looks reasonable. Why only every 256 page and not call
>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery
Acked-by: Joel Stanley
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery
Acked-by: Joel Stanley
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> The System Control Unit IP block in the Aspeed SoCs is typically where
> the pinmux configuration is found, but not always. A number of pins
> depend on state in one of LPC Host Control (LHC) or SoC Display
> Controller
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> The System Control Unit IP block in the Aspeed SoCs is typically where
> the pinmux configuration is found, but not always. A number of pins
> depend on state in one of LPC Host Control (LHC) or SoC Display
> Controller (GFX) IP blocks, so
It is fragile that some definitions acquired via transitive
dependencies, as shown in below:
atomic_*()
ENOMEM/EN* ()
EXPORT_SYMBOL ()
device_initcall ()
preempt_* ()
Include them to prevent possible issues.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland
Signed-off-by:
It is fragile that some definitions acquired via transitive
dependencies, as shown in below:
atomic_*()
ENOMEM/EN* ()
EXPORT_SYMBOL ()
device_initcall ()
preempt_* ()
Include them to prevent possible issues.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang
---
2016-12-07 14:13 GMT+08:00 Baoyou Xie :
> The ARMv8 2967 family (296718, 296716 etc) uses different value
> for controlling the power domain on/off registers, Choose the
> value depending on the compatible.
>
> Multiple domains are prepared for the family, this patch
2016-12-07 14:13 GMT+08:00 Baoyou Xie :
> The ARMv8 2967 family (296718, 296716 etc) uses different value
> for controlling the power domain on/off registers, Choose the
> value depending on the compatible.
>
> Multiple domains are prepared for the family, this patch prepares
> the common
Hi Nick,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:02:49AM +, Nick Dyer wrote:
> +static void rmi_f34v7_parse_img_header_10_bl_container(struct f34_data *f34,
> +const u8 *image)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u8 num_of_containers;
> + unsigned int addr;
Hi Nick,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:02:49AM +, Nick Dyer wrote:
> +static void rmi_f34v7_parse_img_header_10_bl_container(struct f34_data *f34,
> +const u8 *image)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u8 num_of_containers;
> + unsigned int addr;
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> The LPC bus pinmux configuration on fifth generation Aspeed SoCs depends
> on bits in both the System Control Unit and the LPC Host Controller.
>
> The Aspeed LPC Host Controller is described as a child node of the
> LPC
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> The LPC bus pinmux configuration on fifth generation Aspeed SoCs depends
> on bits in both the System Control Unit and the LPC Host Controller.
>
> The Aspeed LPC Host Controller is described as a child node of the
> LPC host-range syscon
Hi Sam,
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:12:52AM +, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> > I don't think the root cause of those warnings are introduced by
> > virtio-crypto
> driver.
> >
> > What's your opinion? Sam and David?
>
> Root
Hi Sam,
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:12:52AM +, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> > I don't think the root cause of those warnings are introduced by
> > virtio-crypto
> driver.
> >
> > What's your opinion? Sam and David?
>
> Root
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-lpc.txt | 111
> +
> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-lpc.txt | 111
> +
> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Corentin Labbe
wrote:
> The documentation of axp20x_device_remove() have a typo and use
> axp20x_device_probe() as name.
> This patch fix this typo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Corentin Labbe
wrote:
> The documentation of axp20x_device_remove() have a typo and use
> axp20x_device_probe() as name.
> This patch fix this typo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:01:49AM +, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> >
> > Would you please review and/or ack the virtio_crypto_algs.c?
> > It is the realization of specified algs based on Linux Crypto Framework.
>
> I have no
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:01:49AM +, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> >
> > Would you please review and/or ack the virtio_crypto_algs.c?
> > It is the realization of specified algs based on Linux Crypto Framework.
>
> I have no
Hi Rob
> > From: Kuninori Morimoto
> >
> > OF graph indicates each devices connection. But it doesn't support type
> > of each port. For example HDMI case, it has video port and sound port
> > in one device node.
> > In this case, current driver can't handle
Hi Rob
> > From: Kuninori Morimoto
> >
> > OF graph indicates each devices connection. But it doesn't support type
> > of each port. For example HDMI case, it has video port and sound port
> > in one device node.
> > In this case, current driver can't handle each port correctly.
> > This patch
zhongjiang writes:
> From: zhong jiang
>
> A soft lookup will occur when I run trinity in syscall kexec_load.
> the corresponding stack information is as follows.
Overall that looks reasonable. Why only every 256 page and not call
cond_resched
zhongjiang writes:
> From: zhong jiang
>
> A soft lookup will occur when I run trinity in syscall kexec_load.
> the corresponding stack information is as follows.
Overall that looks reasonable. Why only every 256 page and not call
cond_resched unconditionally?
The function cond_resched won't
101 - 200 of 1558 matches
Mail list logo