Hi Martin,
Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c
between commit:
2b5b96473efc ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix FC-NVMe LUN discovery")
from Linus' tree and commit:
33b28357dd00 ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix Async GPN_FT for FCP and FC-NVMe scan")
Hi Martin,
Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c
between commit:
2b5b96473efc ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix FC-NVMe LUN discovery")
from Linus' tree and commit:
33b28357dd00 ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix Async GPN_FT for FCP and FC-NVMe scan")
On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:15:16AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
There is a patch dependency .
Below patch not merged yet. We submitted for upstream review.
[PATCH V2] ASoC: dwc: I2S Controller instance param added
You need to mention
On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:15:16AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
There is a patch dependency .
Below patch not merged yet. We submitted for upstream review.
[PATCH V2] ASoC: dwc: I2S Controller instance param added
You need to mention
There are some global registers in Spreadtrum sc27xx PMICs, which will
be accessed by other drivers. So this patch adds one syscon cell to
help to access the PMIC's global registers.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang
---
drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c |3 +++
1 file changed,
There are some global registers in Spreadtrum sc27xx PMICs, which will
be accessed by other drivers. So this patch adds one syscon cell to
help to access the PMIC's global registers.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang
---
drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff
Hi Miquel,
Thanks for reviewing the patch series.
Please see my comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Miquel Raynal [mailto:miquel.ray...@bootlin.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 2:38 AM
> To: nagasureshkumarre...@gmail.com
> Cc: boris.brezil...@bootlin.com; rich...@nod.at;
Hi Miquel,
Thanks for reviewing the patch series.
Please see my comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Miquel Raynal [mailto:miquel.ray...@bootlin.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 2:38 AM
> To: nagasureshkumarre...@gmail.com
> Cc: boris.brezil...@bootlin.com; rich...@nod.at;
Hi, Kumar
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 11:30 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-03-18, 18:21, Shunyong Yang wrote:
> >
> > When multiple cpus are related in one cpufreq policy, the first
> > online cpu
> > will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. In a CPPC
> > case,
> > let's take two
Hi, Kumar
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 11:30 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-03-18, 18:21, Shunyong Yang wrote:
> >
> > When multiple cpus are related in one cpufreq policy, the first
> > online cpu
> > will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. In a CPPC
> > case,
> > let's take two
When debugging recent kernels, people will see '(ptrval)' but there
isn't much information as to what that means. Briefly describe why it's
there.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley
---
Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
When debugging recent kernels, people will see '(ptrval)' but there
isn't much information as to what that means. Briefly describe why it's
there.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley
---
Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Friday 16 March 2018 01:27 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 March 2018 at 05:20, Harish Jenny K N wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 15 March 2018 05:59 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 15 March 2018 at 11:26, Andy Shevchenko
>>> wrote:
On
On Friday 16 March 2018 01:27 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 March 2018 at 05:20, Harish Jenny K N wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 15 March 2018 05:59 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 15 March 2018 at 11:26, Andy Shevchenko
>>> wrote:
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 11:12 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:55:35PM +0100, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
> The bitfield dma_inuse is allocated of size dma_requests bits, thus a
> valid bit address is from 0 to (dma_requests - 1).
> When find_first_zero_bit() fails, it returns dma_requests as invalid
> address.
> Using such address
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:55:35PM +0100, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
> The bitfield dma_inuse is allocated of size dma_requests bits, thus a
> valid bit address is from 0 to (dma_requests - 1).
> When find_first_zero_bit() fails, it returns dma_requests as invalid
> address.
> Using such address
On 3/21/18 10:12 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 3/21/18 7:02 PM, Steve French wrote:
>> Found a patch which solves the dependency issue. In my testing (on
>> 4.9, with Windows 2016, and also to Samba) as Pavel suggested this
>> appears to fix the problem, but I will let Srivatsa confirm that it
On 3/21/18 10:12 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 3/21/18 7:02 PM, Steve French wrote:
>> Found a patch which solves the dependency issue. In my testing (on
>> 4.9, with Windows 2016, and also to Samba) as Pavel suggested this
>> appears to fix the problem, but I will let Srivatsa confirm that it
On 3/21/18 7:02 PM, Steve French wrote:
> Found a patch which solves the dependency issue. In my testing (on
> 4.9, with Windows 2016, and also to Samba) as Pavel suggested this
> appears to fix the problem, but I will let Srivatsa confirm that it
> also fixes it for him. The two attached
On 3/21/18 7:02 PM, Steve French wrote:
> Found a patch which solves the dependency issue. In my testing (on
> 4.9, with Windows 2016, and also to Samba) as Pavel suggested this
> appears to fix the problem, but I will let Srivatsa confirm that it
> also fixes it for him. The two attached
On Wednesday 21 Mar 2018 at 15:54:58 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 21-Mar 14:26, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 Mar 2018 at 12:39:21 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > On 20-Mar 09:43, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > > > From: Quentin Perret
[...]
> > So
On Wednesday 21 Mar 2018 at 15:54:58 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 21-Mar 14:26, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 Mar 2018 at 12:39:21 (+), Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > On 20-Mar 09:43, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > > > From: Quentin Perret
[...]
> > So actually, what I can do
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:15:14PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 20.03.2018 17:34, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:15:16PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> On 20.03.2018 03:18, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 02:06:01PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:15:14PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 20.03.2018 17:34, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:15:16PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> On 20.03.2018 03:18, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 02:06:01PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On
Hi Ji Zhang,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:06:00AM +0800, Ji Zhang wrote:
> When we dump the backtrace of some specific task, there is a potential race
> condition due to the task may be running on other cores if SMP enabled.
> That is because for current implementation, if the task is not the
Hi Ji Zhang,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:06:00AM +0800, Ji Zhang wrote:
> When we dump the backtrace of some specific task, there is a potential race
> condition due to the task may be running on other cores if SMP enabled.
> That is because for current implementation, if the task is not the
When using vfio to pass through a PCIe device (e.g. a GPU card) that
has a huge BAR (e.g. 16GB), a lot of cycles are wasted on memory
pinning because PFNs of PCI BAR are not backed by struct page, and
the corresponding VMA has flag VM_PFNMAP.
With this change, when pinning a region which is a raw
When using vfio to pass through a PCIe device (e.g. a GPU card) that
has a huge BAR (e.g. 16GB), a lot of cycles are wasted on memory
pinning because PFNs of PCI BAR are not backed by struct page, and
the corresponding VMA has flag VM_PFNMAP.
With this change, when pinning a region which is a raw
Per the ACPI specification the only functional purpose for a DIMM
Control Region to be mapped into the system physical address space, from
an OSPM perspective, is to support block-apertures. However, there are
some BIOSen that publish DIMM Control Region SPA entries for pre-boot
environment
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 06:50:54PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>
> >> > +static int afu_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct fpga_afu_region region;
> >> > + struct platform_device
Per the ACPI specification the only functional purpose for a DIMM
Control Region to be mapped into the system physical address space, from
an OSPM perspective, is to support block-apertures. However, there are
some BIOSen that publish DIMM Control Region SPA entries for pre-boot
environment
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 06:50:54PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>
> >> > +static int afu_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct fpga_afu_region region;
> >> > + struct platform_device *pdev =
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 06:54:58PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>
> Hi Hao,
>
> > +static int
> > +build_info_create_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + enum fpga_id_type type, const char *name,
> > +
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 06:54:58PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>
> Hi Hao,
>
> > +static int
> > +build_info_create_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + enum fpga_id_type type, const char *name,
> > +
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 13:37 +0900, y.k.oh wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2018 10:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:17:05AM +0900, YOUNGKEUN OH wrote:
> > > Cleanup checkpatch error:
> > > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by:
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 13:37 +0900, y.k.oh wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2018 10:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:17:05AM +0900, YOUNGKEUN OH wrote:
> > > Cleanup checkpatch error:
> > > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:04:44PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patches 1 and 2 are related to the Razer Blade Stealth that has some dead zone
> near the edges of the touchpad.
> Patches 3 was previously sent and reviewed by Dmitry and he suggested patch 4
> at the time.
> Patches
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:04:44PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patches 1 and 2 are related to the Razer Blade Stealth that has some dead zone
> near the edges of the touchpad.
> Patches 3 was previously sent and reviewed by Dmitry and he suggested patch 4
> at the time.
> Patches
On 03/14/2018 10:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:17:05AM +0900, YOUNGKEUN OH wrote:
>> Cleanup checkpatch error:
>> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YOUNGKEUN OH
>> ---
>>
On 03/14/2018 10:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:17:05AM +0900, YOUNGKEUN OH wrote:
>> Cleanup checkpatch error:
>> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YOUNGKEUN OH
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 16
On (03/21/18 15:49), Nick Terrell wrote:
> depends on CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZSTD, which isn't defined until this patch is in
Yikes! How come I missed that... :)
> [0]
> lkml.kernel.org/r/9c9416b2dff19f05fb4c35879aaa83d11ff72c92.1521626182.git.geliangt...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nick Terrell
On (03/21/18 15:49), Nick Terrell wrote:
> depends on CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZSTD, which isn't defined until this patch is in
Yikes! How come I missed that... :)
> [0]
> lkml.kernel.org/r/9c9416b2dff19f05fb4c35879aaa83d11ff72c92.1521626182.git.geliangt...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nick Terrell ?
CC: Vaneet Narang.
On (03/21/18 10:10), Maninder Singh wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/lz4/lz4_compress.c b/lib/lz4/lz4_compress.c
> index cc7b6d4..185c358 100644
> --- a/lib/lz4/lz4_compress.c
> +++ b/lib/lz4/lz4_compress.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ static FORCE_INLINE int LZ4_compress_generic(
>
CC: Vaneet Narang.
On (03/21/18 10:10), Maninder Singh wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/lz4/lz4_compress.c b/lib/lz4/lz4_compress.c
> index cc7b6d4..185c358 100644
> --- a/lib/lz4/lz4_compress.c
> +++ b/lib/lz4/lz4_compress.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ static FORCE_INLINE int LZ4_compress_generic(
>
Hi Randy,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
I will address below mentioned comments in next version of patch.
Thanks,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli.
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:rdun...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:27 AM
> To:
Hi Randy,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
I will address below mentioned comments in next version of patch.
Thanks,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli.
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:rdun...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:27 AM
> To:
On 03/20/2018 07:33 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
This commit adds a power_supply class instance to represent a
PD source's voltage and current properties. This provides an
interface for reading these properties from user-space or other
drivers.
For PPS enabled Sources, this also provides write
On 03/20/2018 07:33 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
This commit adds a power_supply class instance to represent a
PD source's voltage and current properties. This provides an
interface for reading these properties from user-space or other
drivers.
For PPS enabled Sources, this also provides write
On 03/20/2018 07:33 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
This commit adds the 'usb_type' property to represent USB supplies
which can report a number of different types based on a connection
event.
Examples of this already exist in drivers whereby the existing 'type'
property is updated, based on an event,
On 03/20/2018 07:33 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
This commit adds the 'usb_type' property to represent USB supplies
which can report a number of different types based on a connection
event.
Examples of this already exist in drivers whereby the existing 'type'
property is updated, based on an event,
On 03/20/2018 07:33 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
This commit adds code to handle requesting of PPS APDOs. Switching
between standard PDOs and APDOs, and re-requesting an APDO to
modify operating voltage/current will be triggered by an
external call into TCPM.
Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson
On 03/20/2018 07:33 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
This commit adds code to handle requesting of PPS APDOs. Switching
between standard PDOs and APDOs, and re-requesting an APDO to
modify operating voltage/current will be triggered by an
external call into TCPM.
Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson
Acked-by:
On 03/20/2018 07:33 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
This commit adds sink side support for Get_Status, Status,
Get_PPS_Status and PPS_Status handling. As there's the
potential for a partner to respond with Not_Supported,
handling of this message is also added. Sending of
Not_Supported is added to handle
On 03/20/2018 07:33 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
This commit adds sink side support for Get_Status, Status,
Get_PPS_Status and PPS_Status handling. As there's the
potential for a partner to respond with Not_Supported,
handling of this message is also added. Sending of
Not_Supported is added to handle
A watchdog timer exception also occurs if the selected time base bit
transitions from 0 to 1 due
to an mtspr that writes a 1 to the bit when its previous value was 0.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Wei
---
drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
A watchdog timer exception also occurs if the selected time base bit
transitions from 0 to 1 due
to an mtspr that writes a 1 to the bit when its previous value was 0.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Wei
---
drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git
The current kexec_file ignores kexec_buf.top_down value when call
arch_kexec_walk_mem() to allocate memory for loading kernel/initrd
stuffs. This is not supposed to be what kexec_buf.top_down is used
for.
In patch 0001, introduce a new function walk_system_ram_res_rev()
which is a variant of
From: AKASHI Takahiro
This function, being a variant of walk_system_ram_res() introduced in
commit 8c86e70acead ("resource: provide new functions to walk through
resources"), walks through a list of all the resources of System RAM
in reversed order, i.e., from higher
The current kexec_file ignores kexec_buf.top_down value when call
arch_kexec_walk_mem() to allocate memory for loading kernel/initrd
stuffs. This is not supposed to be what kexec_buf.top_down is used
for.
In patch 0001, introduce a new function walk_system_ram_res_rev()
which is a variant of
From: AKASHI Takahiro
This function, being a variant of walk_system_ram_res() introduced in
commit 8c86e70acead ("resource: provide new functions to walk through
resources"), walks through a list of all the resources of System RAM
in reversed order, i.e., from higher to lower.
It will be used
For kexec_file loading, if kexec_buf.top_down is 'true', the memory which
is used to load kernel/initrd/purgatory is supposed to be allocated from
top to down. This is also consistent with the old kexec loading interface.
However, the current arch_kexec_walk_mem() doesn't do like this. It ignores
For kexec_file loading, if kexec_buf.top_down is 'true', the memory which
is used to load kernel/initrd/purgatory is supposed to be allocated from
top to down. This is also consistent with the old kexec loading interface.
However, the current arch_kexec_walk_mem() doesn't do like this. It ignores
When we dump the backtrace of some specific task, there is a potential race
condition due to the task may be running on other cores if SMP enabled.
That is because for current implementation, if the task is not the current
task, we will get the registers used for unwind from cpu_context saved in
When we dump the backtrace of some specific task, there is a potential race
condition due to the task may be running on other cores if SMP enabled.
That is because for current implementation, if the task is not the current
task, we will get the registers used for unwind from cpu_context saved in
On 21-03-18, 18:21, Shunyong Yang wrote:
> When multiple cpus are related in one cpufreq policy, the first online cpu
> will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. In a CPPC case,
> let's take two related cpus, cpu0 and cpu1 as an example.
>
> After system start, cpu0 is the first
On 21-03-18, 18:21, Shunyong Yang wrote:
> When multiple cpus are related in one cpufreq policy, the first online cpu
> will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. In a CPPC case,
> let's take two related cpus, cpu0 and cpu1 as an example.
>
> After system start, cpu0 is the first
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年03月20日 12:26, Jonathan Helman wrote:
> > > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2018年03月20日 06:14, Jonathan Helman wrote:
> > > > Export the number of
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年03月20日 12:26, Jonathan Helman wrote:
> > > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2018年03月20日 06:14, Jonathan Helman wrote:
> > > > Export the number of successful and failed hugetlb
When we dump the backtrace of some specific task, there is a potential race
condition due to the task may be running on other cores if SMP enabled.
That is because for current implementation, if the task is not the current
task, we will get the registers used for unwind from cpu_context saved in
When we dump the backtrace of some specific task, there is a potential race
condition due to the task may be running on other cores if SMP enabled.
That is because for current implementation, if the task is not the current
task, we will get the registers used for unwind from cpu_context saved in
For generic pins, parameter "arg" is 0 or 1.
For special pins, bias-disable is set by R0R1,
so we need transmited "00" to set bias-disable
When we set "bias-disable" as high-z property,
the parameter should be "MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00".
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao
---
For generic pins, parameter "arg" is 0 or 1.
For special pins, bias-disable is set by R0R1,
so we need transmited "00" to set bias-disable
When we set "bias-disable" as high-z property,
the parameter should be "MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_00".
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao
---
The commit includes mt2712 pinctrl driver.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao
---
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig |7 +
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Makefile |1 +
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt2712.c | 634 +
The commit includes mt2712 pinctrl driver.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao
---
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig |7 +
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Makefile |1 +
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt2712.c | 634 +
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-mt2712.h
This series includes five patches:
1.Add mt2712 pintcrl head file.
2.Add mt2712 pinctrl device node.
3.Add mt2712 pinctrl driver.
4.Support bias-disable of generic and special pins simultaneously.
5.fix check warnings.
Changes in patch v4:
1)fix check warnings for mt2712.
2)add fix check warnings
This series includes five patches:
1.Add mt2712 pintcrl head file.
2.Add mt2712 pinctrl device node.
3.Add mt2712 pinctrl driver.
4.Support bias-disable of generic and special pins simultaneously.
5.fix check warnings.
Changes in patch v4:
1)fix check warnings for mt2712.
2)add fix check warnings
This patch adds pintcrl device node for mt2712.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
This patch adds pintcrl device node for mt2712.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
index
This patch adds pinctrl file for mt2712.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712-pinfunc.h | 1123 +
1 file changed, 1123 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
This patch adds pinctrl file for mt2712.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712-pinfunc.h | 1123 +
1 file changed, 1123 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712-pinfunc.h
diff --git
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 06:29:41PM -0700, Nick Terrell wrote:
> This patch set adds support for a ZSTD-compressed kernel and ramdisk
> images in the kernel boot process. It only integrates the support with
> x86, though the first patch is generic to all architectures.
I'm running this patch set
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 06:29:41PM -0700, Nick Terrell wrote:
> This patch set adds support for a ZSTD-compressed kernel and ramdisk
> images in the kernel boot process. It only integrates the support with
> x86, though the first patch is generic to all architectures.
I'm running this patch set
On (03/21/18 19:56), Nick Terrell wrote:
[..]
> This seems like a reasonable extension to the algorithm, and it looks like
> LZ4_DYN is about a 5% improvement to compression ratio on your benchmark.
> The biggest question I have is if it is worthwhile to maintain a separate
> incompatible variant
On (03/21/18 19:56), Nick Terrell wrote:
[..]
> This seems like a reasonable extension to the algorithm, and it looks like
> LZ4_DYN is about a 5% improvement to compression ratio on your benchmark.
> The biggest question I have is if it is worthwhile to maintain a separate
> incompatible variant
On 3/21/2018 11:15 PM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
The error return code is not being assigned to ret from the call
to clk_prepare_enable and consequently the current check on ret
picks up the previous error return. Fix this by adding in the
missing
On 3/21/2018 11:15 PM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
The error return code is not being assigned to ret from the call
to clk_prepare_enable and consequently the current check on ret
picks up the previous error return. Fix this by adding in the
missing assignment to ret.
Detected by
On (03/22/18 11:14), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> Looking at
>
> printk()->call_console_drivers()->serial8250_console_putchar()->wait_for_xmitr()
>
> ... wait_for_xmitr() can spin for over 1 second waiting for the UART_MSR_CTS
> bit.
[..]
> a 1+ second long busy loop in the console driver
On (03/22/18 11:14), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> Looking at
>
> printk()->call_console_drivers()->serial8250_console_putchar()->wait_for_xmitr()
>
> ... wait_for_xmitr() can spin for over 1 second waiting for the UART_MSR_CTS
> bit.
[..]
> a 1+ second long busy loop in the console driver
Thanks very much for you hint!
On 03/21/2018 05:57 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Cao jin wrote:
>> On 03/17/2018 06:01 PM, Cao jin wrote:
>>> I find two small questions which confuse me a little.
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> # Check signature at end of setup
>>>cmpl
Thanks very much for you hint!
On 03/21/2018 05:57 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Cao jin wrote:
>> On 03/17/2018 06:01 PM, Cao jin wrote:
>>> I find two small questions which confuse me a little.
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> # Check signature at end of setup
>>>cmpl
On 2018/3/22 10:08, Yunlong Song wrote:
> Since f2fs_inode_info is allocated with flag GFP_F2FS_ZERO, so we do not
> need to initialize zero value for its member any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
Thanks,
On 2018/3/22 10:08, Yunlong Song wrote:
> Since f2fs_inode_info is allocated with flag GFP_F2FS_ZERO, so we do not
> need to initialize zero value for its member any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu
Thanks,
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Maxime Ripard
>
> The A33 has a MIPI-DSI block, along with its D-PHY. Let's add it in order
> to use it in the relevant boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Maxime Ripard
>
> The A33 has a MIPI-DSI block, along with its D-PHY. Let's add it in order
> to use it in the relevant boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi | 44
Hi Pavel,
On 21 March 2018 at 22:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2018-03-21 19:30:16, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> We can register one notifier through register_reboot_notifier() function to
>> prepare to power off the system, then we can remove the
>> 'pm_power_off_prepare'
>> hook in
Hi Pavel,
On 21 March 2018 at 22:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2018-03-21 19:30:16, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> We can register one notifier through register_reboot_notifier() function to
>> prepare to power off the system, then we can remove the
>> 'pm_power_off_prepare'
>> hook in following
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
between commit:
fa3dd623e559 ("drm/i915/gvt: keep oa config in shadow ctx")
from Linus' tree and commit:
b20c0d5ce104 ("drm/i915/gvt: Update PDPs after a vGPU mm object is
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
between commit:
fa3dd623e559 ("drm/i915/gvt: keep oa config in shadow ctx")
from Linus' tree and commit:
b20c0d5ce104 ("drm/i915/gvt: Update PDPs after a vGPU mm object is
usbipd includes exported devices in response to exportable device list.
Exclude exported devices from exportable device list to avoid:
- import requests for devices that are exported only to fail the request.
- revealing devices that are imported by a client to another client.
Signed-off-by:
usbipd includes exported devices in response to exportable device list.
Exclude exported devices from exportable device list to avoid:
- import requests for devices that are exported only to fail the request.
- revealing devices that are imported by a client to another client.
Signed-off-by:
1 - 100 of 1866 matches
Mail list logo