From: Feng Sun
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:13:40 +0800
> +static inline bool netpoll_xmit_complete(int rc)
> +{
> + return dev_xmit_complete(rc);
> +}
There is no need for this useless indirection, just call dev_xmit_complete()
staright.
Also, even if it was suitable, never use the inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Brown
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 12:35 AM
> To: Ashish Kumar
> Cc: shawn...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> s...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; robh...@kernel.org;
> mark.rutl...@arm.com;
From: Xiaochun Lee
When enabled Firmware First mode in UEFI, we need to
set the cmci_disabled and ignore_ce in mca cfg
that users can check correct status from
"/sys/devices/system/machinecheck/machinecheckXXX/cmci_disabled"
Signed-off-by: Xiaochun Lee
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 2
After commit baeababb5b85d5c4e6c917efe2a1504179438d3b
("tun: return NET_XMIT_DROP for dropped packets"),
when tun_net_xmit drop packets, it will free skb and return NET_XMIT_DROP,
netpoll_send_skb_on_dev will run into following use after free cases:
1. retry netpoll_start_xmit with freed skb;
2.
On 25-08-19, 07:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The es2 Greybus host controller has long been stable, so move it out of
> drivers/staging/ to drivers/greybus/
>
> Cc: Johan Hovold
> Cc: Alex Elder
> Cc: greybus-...@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Greg
On 25-08-19, 07:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The Greybus core code has been stable for a long time, and has been
> shipping for many years in millions of phones. With the advent of a
> recent Google Summer of Code project, and a number of new devices in the
> works from various companies, it
On 25-08-19, 07:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Some function prototypes do not match the expected alignment formatting
> so fix that up so that checkpatch is happy.
>
> Cc: "Bryan O'Donoghue"
> Cc: Johan Hovold
> Cc: Alex Elder
> Cc: greybus-...@lists.linaro.org
> Cc:
On 25-08-19, 07:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Some function prototypes do not match the expected alignment formatting
> so fix that up so that checkpatch is happy.
>
> Cc: David Lin
> Cc: Johan Hovold
> Cc: Alex Elder
> Cc: greybus-...@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
>
On 25-08-19, 07:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Some function prototypes do not match the expected alignment formatting
> so fix that up so that checkpatch is happy.
>
> Cc: Johan Hovold
> Cc: Alex Elder
> Cc: greybus-...@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
> Signed-off-by: Greg
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I
901 - 910 of 910 matches
Mail list logo
