Bradly Spengler continues to violate the GPL, it's fine now tho: he's
creating his own reality and everyone is accepting it:
https://mobile.twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1349086946560253952
He "corrects" people saying "grsec isn't gpl anymore", informing them
he's simply "running a
First off, its no longer even accurate
Wrong. Grsecurity is violating the Linux Copyright by preventing
redistribution, by adding additional terms between it and distributees.
It does not matter if Linus, the weak faggot, is "never going to
include" it.
Grsecurity is violating the GCC
Linus etc do not give a FUCK that Grsecurity is BLATANTLY violating the
GPL. So why do you fucking retards complain about this?
DURR BECUAUSE WE DON'T HAVE 2 DO ANYTHING, CAN JUST COMMISERATE
(
Linus etc do not give a FUCK that Grsecurity is BLATANTLY violating the
GPL. So why do you fucking retards complain about this?
DURR BECUAUSE WE DON'T HAVE 2 DO ANYTHING, CAN JUST COMMISERATE
(
Linus etc do not give a FUCK that Grsecurity is BLATANTLY violating the
GPL. So why do you fucking retards complain about this?
DURR BECUAUSE WE DON'T HAVE 2 DO ANYTHING, CAN JUST COMMISERATE
Is Trump dead? He never made it to the Capitol, was he killed?
There's radio silence now.
As a linux Kernel dev how does this make you feel?
Silence is consent.
Are there FOSS developers making decent money via Patreon, GoFundMe,
whatever?
Yes, Grsecurity is making good money.
They simply added a no-redistribution agreement to their patch of the
Linux Kernel.
(
Silence is consent.
Are there FOSS developers making decent money via Patreon, GoFundMe,
whatever?
Yes, Grsecurity is making good money.
They simply added a no-redistribution agreement to their patch of the
Linux Kernel.
(
Should each Linux copyright owner of whom's copyright is being
violated (By GrSecurity) bring a "small claims copyright" case every
time GrSecurity sends a new infringing patch to a customer?
(GRSecurity blatantly violates the clause in the Linux kernel and
GCC copyright licenses
Should each Linux copyright owner of whom's copyright is being
violated (By GrSecurity) bring a "small claims copyright" case every
time GrSecurity sends a new infringing patch to a customer?
(GRSecurity blatantly violates the clause in the Linux kernel and
GCC copyright licenses
I am happy. Cirno defeated the frog.
Thought you might be interested:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv3a2tzUTn4
GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the GCC
copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access
Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works of the kernel and
(in the
You have it all wrong. The black in blacklist refers to women,
as in the yin and the yang. The white refers to men: a constructive
force. (While the women are destructive in society: always pitting
the whitelist (men) against each-other, because said list didn't
obey the blacklist (where women
Dear LKML, RMS, ESR: Due to the recent "unrest", some who are ignorant
of history, or simply young, are alarmed by happenstances: "Why won't
anyone do anything, why won't anyone fight on our side?"
In response to the chan post >>>/pol/264739416 an answer was provided:
YHWH allows men to marry
Dear RMS, a commentator is now accusing me of being the executioner of
"foss" :
oh it's you, the schizo who killed foss by trying to defend it and
thinks he's a lawyer
Later the commentator clarifies :
You went on a mailing list for some foss project with the intention of
exposing a patent
15 matches
Mail list logo
