Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:32:28 +0100
> Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>RTA_* attributes aren't used for routing rules anymore inside
>>the kernel.
>
>
> But we need to keep them in iproute2 for back compatibility?
Not really for compatibility, its the
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:32:28 +0100
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > Hm, why no RTA_FWMASK in HEAD rtnetlink.h
> >
> >
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Hm, why no RTA_FWMASK in HEAD rtnetlink.h
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=include/linux/rtnetlink.h;h=4a629ea70cc4ca60a6f486f8653974af68dbe8cd;hb=HEAD
>
> and 2.6.19
>
>
On Wednesday 14 of March 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > This patch
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html
> >
> > didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems.
>
> As mentioned in the changelog, its in 2.6.19.
Hm, why no
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> This patch
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html
>
> didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems.
As mentioned in the changelog, its in 2.6.19.
> The question is - are patches adding some functionality that's not in
> upstream
On Tuesday 13 of March 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This is an experimental to the iproute2 command set.
>
> The version number includes the kernel version to denote what features are
> supported. The same source should build on older systems, but obviously the
> newer kernel features won't be
On Wednesday 14 of March 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Of course I mean:
> This patch
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html
>
adds functionality that...
> didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems.
--
Arkadiusz MiĆkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm /
On Tuesday 13 of March 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
This is an experimental to the iproute2 command set.
The version number includes the kernel version to denote what features are
supported. The same source should build on older systems, but obviously the
newer kernel features won't be
On Wednesday 14 of March 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Of course I mean:
This patch
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html
adds functionality that...
didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems.
--
Arkadiusz MiĆkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm /
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
This patch
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html
didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems.
As mentioned in the changelog, its in 2.6.19.
The question is - are patches adding some functionality that's not in
upstream
kernel
On Wednesday 14 of March 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
This patch
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html
didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems.
As mentioned in the changelog, its in 2.6.19.
Hm, why no RTA_FWMASK in HEAD
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Hm, why no RTA_FWMASK in HEAD rtnetlink.h
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=include/linux/rtnetlink.h;h=4a629ea70cc4ca60a6f486f8653974af68dbe8cd;hb=HEAD
and 2.6.19
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:32:28 +0100
Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Hm, why no RTA_FWMASK in HEAD rtnetlink.h
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:32:28 +0100
Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RTA_* attributes aren't used for routing rules anymore inside
the kernel.
But we need to keep them in iproute2 for back compatibility?
Not really for compatibility, its the numerical
This is an experimental to the iproute2 command set.
The version number includes the kernel version to denote what features are
supported. The same source should build on older systems, but obviously the
newer kernel features won't be available. As much as possible, this package
tries to be
This is an experimental to the iproute2 command set.
The version number includes the kernel version to denote what features are
supported. The same source should build on older systems, but obviously the
newer kernel features won't be available. As much as possible, this package
tries to be
16 matches
Mail list logo