On 20.01.2021 17:09, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 17:07 +0100, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
>
>> Do you expect other users for these new config symbols?
>
> Probably not.
>
>> If not it seems
>> to me that the goal of enabling module constructors for UML could also
>> be achieved
On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 17:07 +0100, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> Do you expect other users for these new config symbols?
Probably not.
> If not it seems
> to me that the goal of enabling module constructors for UML could also
> be achieved without introducing new config symbols.
Yeah, true.
>
On 19.01.2021 12:18, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg
>
> On ARCH=um, loading a module doesn't result in its constructors
> getting called, which breaks module gcov since the debugfs files
> are never registered. On the other hand, in-kernel constructors
> have already been called by
From: Johannes Berg
On ARCH=um, loading a module doesn't result in its constructors
getting called, which breaks module gcov since the debugfs files
are never registered. On the other hand, in-kernel constructors
have already been called by the dynamic linker, so we can't call
them again.
Get
4 matches
Mail list logo